Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalization, ray equivalence and the phase orbits of the unit sphere

Statement

Let H≠{0} be a complex Hilbert space and use the notation of State vectors, unit vectors, rays, normalization and phases of a Hilbert space: the unit sphere S(H), the nonzero vectors H×, the ray [ψ], the ray space R(H), the normalization map ν, the phase group U(1) and the phase action. Then:

(a) For every ψ∈H× one has ν(ψ)∈[ψ]∩S(H) and ν(ν(ψ))=ν(ψ); and for every z∈C with z≠0, ν(zψ)=z∣z∣ ν(ψ). Moreover ν maps H× onto S(H).

(b) For ψ,φ∈H×: [ψ]=[φ] if and only if ν(φ)=ζν(ψ) for some phase factor ζ∈U(1); the phase factor is then unique.

(c) For every ψ∈S(H) the intersection of the ray of ψ with the unit sphere is exactly the phase orbit of ψ, [ψ]∩S(H)={ζψ:ζ∈U(1)}=U(1)ψ. Consequently the fibres of the map S(H)→R(H), ψ↦[ψ], are exactly the phase orbits, and this map induces a bijection from the set of phase orbits on S(H) onto R(H).

(d) For ψ,φ∈S(H): [ψ]=[φ] if and only if φ=ζψ for a unique ζ∈U(1); in that case ζ=⟨φ,ψ⟩ and ∣⟨φ,ψ⟩∣=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero complex Hilbert space H; nonzero vectors ψ,φ∈H×; a nonzero scalar z∈C; unit vectors u∈S(H) where stated.

[F1]

By State vectors, unit vectors, rays, normalization and phases of a Hilbert space: S(H)={ψ:∥ψ∥=1}, H×=H∖{0}, [ψ]={zψ:z≠0}, R(H)={[ψ]:ψ≠0}, ν(ψ)=∥ψ∥−1ψ, U(1)={ζ:∣ζ∣=1}, and the words ray-equivalent and phase-equivalent have the meanings fixed there.

[F2]

The inner-product norm satisfies ∥ψ∥≥0 with ∥ψ∥=0 exactly for ψ=0, and ∥zψ∥=∣z∣ ∥ψ∥ for every scalar z and vector ψ (The induced length is a norm); the inner product is linear in the first argument, conjugate-linear in the second and conjugate symmetric (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).

[F3]

For complex numbers, ∣z∣=0 exactly for z=0, and ∣zw∣=∣z∣ ∣w∣ (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

[F4]

If ζ∈U(1) and ψ∈S(H), then ∥ζψ∥=∣ζ∣ ∥ψ∥=1, so ζψ∈S(H); this is the phase action of [F1] and uses [F2].

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

[(a) normalization is well defined and lies in the ray] For ψ≠0 the vector ν(ψ)=∥ψ∥−1ψ is a nonzero complex multiple of ψ, hence lies in [ψ]; its norm is ∥ν(ψ)∥=∣∥ψ∥−1∣ ∥ψ∥=∥ψ∥−1∥ψ∥=1 by [F2] and [F3], so ν(ψ)∈S(H); and ν(ν(ψ))=ν(ψ) because ν(ψ) is a unit vector. For z≠0 the norm is ∥zψ∥=∣z∣ ∥ψ∥ by [F2], hence ν(zψ)=∣z∣−1∥ψ∥−1zψ=(z/∣z∣)∥ψ∥−1ψ=(z/∣z∣)ν(ψ), using z/∣z∣=∣z∣−1z for the unit complex number z/∣z∣. Finally ν is surjective because every u∈S(H) satisfies ν(u)=∥u∥−1u=u.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

[(c) the unit representatives of a ray form one phase orbit] Let u∈S(H). If v∈[u]∩S(H) then v=zu for some z≠0, and 1=∥v∥=∣z∣ ∥u∥=∣z∣ by [F2] and [F3]; hence z∈U(1) and v=zu∈U(1)u. Conversely if ζ∈U(1) then ζu lies in [u] by definition and in S(H) by [F4]. Thus [u]∩S(H)=U(1)u.

2.2givenstep 1.1F1F2F3algebra

[(b) ray equivalence is phase equivalence of normalizations] If [ψ]=[φ], then by definition φ=zψ with z≠0, so by step 1.1 ν(φ)=ν(zψ)=(z/∣z∣)ν(ψ) with z/∣z∣∈U(1); uniqueness of the phase factor holds because ν(ψ)≠0. Conversely, if ν(φ)=ζν(ψ) for some ζ∈U(1), then φ=∥φ∥ν(φ)=∥φ∥ζ∥ψ∥−1ψ is a nonzero complex multiple of ψ, so [φ]=[ψ].

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1F1algebra

[(c) the induced map on phase orbits is a bijection] By step 2.1 the fibre of ψ↦[ψ] over a ray R is {u∈S(H):[u]=R}=R∩S(H), which is a full phase orbit; and every phase orbit U(1)u is such a fibre because U(1)u⊆[u]. The map therefore descends to a well-defined injective map from the set of phase orbits onto R(H), and it is surjective because every ray contains the unit vector ν(ψ) for any of its representatives ψ by step 1.1.

4.1givenstep 2.2F1F2F3algebra∎

[(d) phase uniqueness for unit representatives] Let ψ,φ∈S(H) with [ψ]=[φ]. Then φ=zψ for some z≠0, so 1=∥φ∥=∣z∣ ∥ψ∥=∣z∣ by [F2] and [F3]; writing ζ:=z∈U(1) gives φ=ζψ, and if ζ′∈U(1) also satisfies φ=ζ′ψ, then (ζ−ζ′)ψ=0 with ψ≠0, which forces ζ=ζ′ by [F2] and [F3]. Moreover ⟨φ,ψ⟩=⟨ζψ,ψ⟩=ζ⟨ψ,ψ⟩=ζ∥ψ∥2=ζ by linearity in the first argument, so ∣⟨φ,ψ⟩∣=1. The converse implication is the definition of ray equivalence.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources