Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rays, unit vectors and rank-one Hilbert projections

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice, which is the choice hypothesis of the rank-one calculus Rank-one operator calculus. Let H≠{0} be a complex Hilbert space and let Tu,vx=⟨x,v⟩u(x∈H) be the rank-one operator calculus of that item. Use the notation of State vectors, unit vectors, rays, normalization and phases of a Hilbert space for the unit sphere S(H), the nonzero vectors H×, the ray [ψ], the ray space R(H) and the normalization ν. Then:

(a) For every ψ∈H× the operator Tψ,ψ is a nonzero self-adjoint positive trace-class operator with ∥Tψ,ψ∥1=tr⁡(Tψ,ψ)=∥ψ∥2,Tψ,ψ=∥ψ∥2 Tν(ψ),ν(ψ),⟨Tψ,ψx,x⟩=∣⟨x,ψ⟩∣2(x∈H).

(b) For every u∈S(H) the operator Tu,u is the Hilbert orthogonal projection onto the one-dimensional linear subspace Cu; in particular Tu,u≠0, Tu,u2=Tu,u and Tu,u∗=Tu,u. Conversely, if M is a one-dimensional linear subspace of H and u∈S(H) satisfies M=Cu, then the Hilbert orthogonal projection PM onto M equals Tu,u. Thus the operators Tu,u with u∈S(H) are exactly the Hilbert orthogonal projections of H with one-dimensional range.

(c) For nonzero ψ,φ∈H×: Tψ,ψ=Tφ,φ⟺∥ψ∥=∥φ∥ and [ψ]=[φ]. In particular, for u,w∈S(H) one has Tu,u=Tw,w if and only if w=ζu for some ζ∈U(1).

(d) The map j:R(H)⟶S1(H),j([ψ]):=Tν(ψ),ν(ψ), is well defined and injective, and its image is exactly {Tu,u:u∈S(H)}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero complex Hilbert space H; nonzero vectors ψ,φ; unit vectors u,w; the rank-one operators Tu,v.

[F1]

Rank-one calculus (Rank-one operator calculus): Tu,v is bounded with ∥Tu,v∥=∥u∥ ∥v∥, the assignment is linear in the first and conjugate-linear in the second variable, Tu,v is trace class with ∥Tu,v∥1=∥u∥ ∥v∥ and tr⁡(Tu,v)=⟨u,v⟩, one has Tu,v∗=Tv,u, for bounded B one has BTu,v=TBu,v and Tu,vB=Tu,B∗v, for trace-class S one has STu,v=TSu,v and tr⁡(STx,y)=⟨Sx,y⟩, and (u,v)↦Tu,v is trace-norm continuous.

[F2]

The state-space vocabulary (State vectors, unit vectors, rays, normalization and phases of a Hilbert space): S(H) is the set of unit vectors, H× the set of nonzero vectors, [ψ]={zψ:z≠0}, R(H) the set of rays, ν(ψ)=∥ψ∥−1ψ, and U(1) the phase group.

[F3]

Normalization and phases (Normalization, ray equivalence and the phase orbits of the unit sphere): ν(ψ)∈[ψ]∩S(H); [ψ]=[φ] if and only if ν(φ)=ζν(ψ) for a unique ζ∈U(1); and for u,w∈S(H), [u]=[w] if and only if w=ζu with unique ζ∈U(1).

[F4]

Hilbert orthogonal projection (The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace): for a closed linear subspace M of H there is a unique map PM:H→H with PMx∈M and x−PMx∈M⊥ for every x; a map with these two properties is therefore PM.

[F5]

The line spanned by a unit vector is closed (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S, Normed subspace, A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed): Cu={zu:z∈C} is a linear subspace admitting the one-element basis (u), hence a finite-dimensional normed subspace of H and therefore closed in H.

[F6]

Norm, pairing and positivity (The induced length is a norm, Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length, Self-adjoint, positive, unitary and normal operators): ∥v∥≥0 with ∥v∥=0 exactly for v=0, ∥zv∥=∣z∣ ∥v∥; the pairing is linear in the first argument, conjugate-linear in the second and conjugate symmetric; and a bounded operator on any real or complex Hilbert space is positive when its quadratic form ⟨Tx,x⟩ is real and nonnegative for every x.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F6algebra

[(a) trace, positivity and scaling] By [F1], Tψ,ψ is trace class with ∥Tψ,ψ∥1=∥ψ∥2 and tr⁡(Tψ,ψ)=⟨ψ,ψ⟩=∥ψ∥2, and it satisfies Tψ,ψ∗=Tψ,ψ. For every x∈H, ⟨Tψ,ψx,x⟩=⟨⟨x,ψ⟩ψ,x⟩=∣⟨x,ψ⟩∣2≥0 by [F6], so Tψ,ψ is positive under the general bounded-operator definition in [F6]; also Tψ,ψψ=∥ψ∥2ψ≠0, so Tψ,ψ is nonzero. For z≠0 the conjugate-linearity of [F1] gives Tzψ,zψ=∣z∣2Tψ,ψ; substituting z=∥ψ∥−1 and using ν(ψ)=∥ψ∥−1ψ gives Tν(ψ),ν(ψ)=∥ψ∥−2Tψ,ψ, that is the displayed identity after multiplying by ∥ψ∥2.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1F4F5F6algebra

[(b) Tu,u is the projection onto Cu] Let u∈S(H). The line Cu is a closed linear subspace by [F5]. For every x one has Tu,ux=⟨x,u⟩u∈Cu, and ⟨x−Tu,ux,u⟩=⟨x,u⟩−⟨x,u⟩∥u∥2=0 by [F6], so x−Tu,ux∈(Cu)⊥; by the characterisation of [F4] applied to M=Cu, this says Tu,u=PCu, so Tu,u is a Hilbert orthogonal projection and in particular is nonzero with Tu,u2=Tu,u and Tu,u∗=Tu,u.

2.2givenstep 1.1F1F2F3F6algebra

[(c) equality of rank-one operators] Suppose first that Tψ,ψ=Tφ,φ with ψ,φ≠0. Evaluating both sides at ψ gives ∥ψ∥2ψ=⟨ψ,ψ⟩ψ=Tψ,ψψ=Tφ,φψ=⟨ψ,φ⟩φ by [F1] and [F6]; the left side is nonzero, so ⟨ψ,φ⟩≠0 and φ=zψ with z=∥ψ∥2/⟨ψ,φ⟩≠0. Hence φ and ψ lie in the same ray, so ∥φ∥=∣z∣ ∥ψ∥ by [F6]; moreover Tφ,φ=Tzψ,zψ=∣z∣2Tψ,ψ=Tψ,ψ by conjugate-linearity and the hypothesis, and since Tψ,ψ≠0 this forces ∣z∣2=1, hence ∥φ∥=∥ψ∥. Conversely, if ∥ψ∥=∥φ∥ and [ψ]=[φ], then φ=zψ for some z≠0, and taking norms gives ∣z∣=1; then Tφ,φ=Tzψ,zψ=∣z∣2Tψ,ψ=Tψ,ψ. For unit vectors this is the stated equivalence Tu,u=Tw,w  ⟺  w=ζu, ζ∈U(1), by [F3].

3.1givenstep 2.1F1F4F6algebra

[(b) the converse identification] Let M be a one-dimensional linear subspace and let u∈S(H) with M=Cu. For arbitrary x, the defining properties of PM in [F4] give PMx∈M=Cu, so PMx=αu for a unique scalar α, and x−PMx∈M⊥, so ⟨x−PMx,u⟩=0. Consequently α=α∥u∥2=⟨αu,u⟩=⟨PMx,u⟩=⟨x,u⟩, and therefore PMx=⟨x,u⟩u=Tu,ux for every x. Thus the Hilbert orthogonal projections with one-dimensional range are exactly the operators Tu,u, u∈S(H).

4.1givenstep 2.1step 3.1step 2.2F1F2F3algebra∎

[(d) the ray-to-state map] If [ψ]=[φ], then by [F3] the unit representatives satisfy ν(φ)=ζν(ψ) for some ζ∈U(1), whence Tν(φ),ν(φ)=Tζν(ψ),ζν(ψ)=∣ζ∣2Tν(ψ),ν(ψ)=Tν(ψ),ν(ψ) by the conjugate-linearity of [F1]; thus j is well defined. If Tν(ψ),ν(ψ)=Tν(φ),ν(φ), then step 2.2 applied to the unit vectors ν(ψ),ν(φ) gives ν(φ)=ζν(ψ) for some ζ∈U(1), so [φ]=[ψ] by [F3]; thus j is injective. Its image is {Tu,u:u∈S(H)} by definition of ν, and by steps 2.1 and 3.1 this set consists exactly of the one-dimensional Hilbert orthogonal projections of H. This completes (a)-(d).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources