Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded multivariable power series are holomorphic with unique derivative coefficients

Statement

Fix an integer m≥1, a∈Cm, positive real radii r=(r0,…,rm−1), and M≥0. For a multi-index α∈Nm, write ∣α∣=∑i<mαi, α!=∏i<mαi!, and wα=∏i<mwiαi. Suppose c:Nm→C satisfies ∣cα∣≤M∏i<mri−αi. Then the series g(z)=∑αcα(z−a)α converges absolutely and uniformly on every closed polydisc ∣zi−ai∣≤sri with 0<s<1. Its sum is holomorphic on Δr(a)={z:∣zi−ai∣<ri for all i<m}, in the sense of a total complex-linear differential.

Let ek denote the multi-index with 1 at coordinate k and 0 elsewhere. For every k<m and 0<θ<1, the reindexed first derivative coefficients dν=(νk+1)cν+ek satisfy

∣dν∣≤Mrk(1−θ)2∏i<m(θri)−νi.

Every iterated complex coordinate partial derivative exists and is holomorphic on Δr(a), and, with all coordinate differentiations interpreted as Wirtinger derivatives,

∂zγg(z)=∑ν∈Nm(ν+γ)!ν!cν+γ(z−a)ν,∂zγg(a)=γ!cγ.

Each derived series converges absolutely and uniformly on every smaller closed polydisc. If a second family c′ satisfies a bound of the same form on the same radii, with a possibly different constant, and has the same sum throughout Δr(a), then cα=cα′ for every α.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The integer m≥1, centre a, positive radii r, constant M≥0, and coefficient family c with the stated bound.

[F1]

Multi-indexed absolute sums are independent of enumeration and their box partial sums converge to that sum; absolutely convergent complex series can be rearranged and split (Multi-indexed power series in Cm and their absolute convergence, Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum).

[F2]

A summable family of uniform nonnegative bounds gives absolute uniform convergence by the M-test; a nonnegative series converges when its finite partial sums are bounded, and ∑j≥0sj=(1−s)−1 for 0<s<1 (Weierstrass M-test for complex-valued function series, A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum, For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges).

[F3]

Holomorphy means a complex-linear total differential with remainder o(∥h∥); the Wirtinger derivative is ∂zk=12(∂xk−i∂yk) (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of Cm, Wirtinger operators in Cm).

[F4]

The finite complex binomial formula expands (u+v)j with the nonnegative integer binomial coefficients; finite real sums obey additivity, scaling and monotonicity, complex arithmetic obeys the field laws, and ∣uv∣=∣u∣∣v∣, ∣u+v∣≤∣u∣+∣v∣ (The binomial theorem over the complex field, Laws of finite sums and finite products, C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2), Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

[F5]

Multi-index factorials, natural powers including w0=1, induction on natural numbers, polydiscs, and the Euclidean norm are as in Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N, Integer powers in the complex field, The principle of mathematical induction, Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in Cm, and Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary. In particular ∣hi∣≤∥h∥, and every factorial is nonzero.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F4F5

For 0<s<1 and ∣zi−ai∣≤sri, the coefficient bound gives ∣cα(z−a)α∣≤Ms∣α∣. The sum of these bounds over the box αi≤N is M∏i<m∑j=0Nsj≤M(1−s)−m. Every finite set of multi-indices lies in a box, so [F2] makes the bounds summable, and [F1] and the M-test give the asserted absolute uniform convergence. Each point of Δr(a) lies in such a closed polydisc, so g is defined throughout Δr(a).

1.2givenF4F5

Fix z with w=z−a and ∣wi∣≤sri, where 0<s<t<1. For h≠0 put η=max⁡i<m∣hi∣/ri and restrict to h small enough that T=(t−s)/η≥1. This is possible since η≤∥h∥/min⁡iri. Expand the polynomial ϕα(u)=∏i<m(wi+uhi)αi=∑jAα,juj by [F4]. Its first two coefficients are Aα,0=wα and Aα,1=∑k<m, αk>0αkwα−ekhk. The triangle inequality and the nonnegative binomial coefficients give ∑j∣Aα,j∣Tj≤∏i<m(∣wi∣+T∣hi∣)αi≤∏i<m(tri)αi. As T≥1, the remainder Rα=ϕα(1)−Aα,0−Aα,1 therefore satisfies ∣Rα∣≤T−2∏i<m(tri)αi.

2.1givenF2F4F5step 1.1

Fix k<m and 0<θ<1. Reindexing by α=ν+ek gives ∣dν∣≤(M/rk)(νk+1)∏i<mri−νi=(M/rk)(νk+1)θ∣ν∣∏i<m(θri)−νi. For a natural j, (j+1)θj=∑p+q=jθp+q≤(∑p=0jθp)2≤(1−θ)−2. Since θ∣ν∣≤θνk, this proves the claimed bound on dν. Step 1.1 applied to d on radii θr gives absolute uniform convergence of its series on every closed sr polydisc with s<θ. For each s<1 such a θ exists; thus the first derived series converges absolutely and uniformly on every smaller closed polydisc.

3.1F1F3F5step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2

Step 1.2 and the box estimate in step 1.1 imply ∑α∣cαRα∣≤Mη2/((t−s)2(1−t)m)≤M∥h∥2/((min⁡iri)2(t−s)2(1−t)m). Both z and z+h belong to the closed tr polydisc, and the first derived sums bk(z)=∑ν(νk+1)cν+ekwν converge absolutely by step 2.1. Thus [F1] permits splitting and reindexing to obtain g(z+h)−g(z)−∑k<mbk(z)hk=∑αcαRα. The map h↦∑kbk(z)hk is complex-linear, and the displayed bound is O(∥h∥2), hence o(∥h∥). By [F3], g has this total complex differential at z. Taking h=uek and h=iuek with real u→0 gives ∂xkg=bk and ∂ykg=ibk, so ∂zkg=bk. Every interior z admits such s,t, proving holomorphy and the first termwise derivative formula throughout Δr(a).

4.1F5step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

The arguments in steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 used only the stated coefficient bound, so they apply again to any derived coefficient family with a bound on positive radii. Fix a multi-index γ of order q=∣γ∣>0 and a real 0<τ<1. Put tj=1−j(1−τ)/q for 0≤j≤q, so 1=t0>t1>⋯>tq=τ>0. Apply step 2.1 successively with radii tj−1r and shrink factor tj/tj−1, and apply step 3.1 at each stage. The finitely many constants in the bounds remain finite. Induction on the number of differentiations gives the coefficient at ν after differentiating with multi-index δ as ((ν+δ)!/ν!)cν+δ: one further differentiation in coordinate k multiplies the coefficient at ν+ek by νk+1, changing the factorial denominator from (ν+ek)! to ν!. This formula is independent of the order of coordinate differentiations. The final series represents ∂zγg and is holomorphic on Δτr(a) by step 3.1. For any closed sr polydisc with s<1, choose s<τ<1; step 1.1 applied to the final coefficient bound gives absolute uniform convergence there. Since every interior point lies in some Δτr(a), all these identities and holomorphy hold throughout Δr(a). For q=0 they are step 1.1 and step 3.1.

5.1givenF3F5step 4.1∎

At z=a every monomial in the derived series of step 4.1 vanishes except ν=0, whose value is 1; thus ∂zγg(a)=γ!cγ. If c′ satisfies the stated bound and has the same sum, the argument just proved applies to c′ as well. The derivatives are those of the same function, so γ!cγ=γ!cγ′. Cancelling the nonzero factorial gives cγ=cγ′ for every γ, proving uniqueness.

Remarks

The statement follows the power-series and derivative-coefficient results in Lebl §1.2. The geometric estimate and the binomial total-differential remainder above supply a local proof directly for the stated coefficient hypothesis and the total-differentiability convention.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources