How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kernels, cokernels, and finite extensions of coherent module sheaves
Statement
Let be a ringed space and use the coherence definition on the A page. The kernel and cokernel of any morphism between coherent -module sheaves are coherent. In every short exact sequence of -module sheaves, if any two of , , and are coherent, then the third is coherent.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A ringed space ; an -module morphism between coherent modules; and, for the extension assertion, a short exact sequence of -modules.
Coherent module sheaves on complex manifolds: a coherent module is locally of finite type, and the kernel of every morphism from a finite-rank free module sheaf into it is locally of finite type.
Kernel sheaves are objectwise, while cokernels and images are sheafified: kernels are objectwise; cokernel and image sheaves are the sheafifications of their sectionwise presheaves.
Exact sequences of sheaves: a short exact sequence has zero kernel at the left endpoint, image equal to kernel at the middle term, and zero cokernel at the right endpoint.
A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk: epimorphisms and exactness in the constructions below can be checked on stalks.
Proof
Let be coherent and fix . Local finite type gives, after choosing a neighborhood of , a finite-rank free module sheaf map that is surjective on every stalk. By [F1], its kernel is locally of finite type; after shrinking to , choose finitely many sections generating that kernel on and let be the corresponding map. The sequence is exact by [F2], [F3], and [F4]. Thus every coherent module has a local finite presentation.
Let be a morphism of coherent modules and set . Choose locally a finite-rank free epimorphism . The composite has a locally finite-type kernel by [F1]; its image under is exactly on each stalk, since is stalkwise surjective. Hence is locally of finite type by [F4]. For every finite-rank map , its composite with the inclusion has the same kernel; [F1] for makes that kernel locally of finite type. Thus is coherent.
Let . It is locally of finite type because it is a quotient of the locally finite-type module . To check its relation condition, fix a finite-rank map and a point . Since is a sheaf epimorphism, choose local lifts of the finitely many images of the standard basis near ; they define lifting . Also choose a local finite-rank epimorphism . Define by . By [F1], is locally of finite type. Projection of to the second factor has image exactly on every stalk: an element of maps to zero in , and any stalk element has , so a stalk preimage under completes it to an element of . The image of a locally finite-type module is locally finite type, so is locally of finite type. This holds for every , hence is coherent.
Consider a short exact sequence . If and are coherent, then is coherent by step 2.1. If and are coherent, then is coherent by step 2.2.
It remains to assume and coherent. Local finite generators of together with local lifts to of finite generators of generate , so is locally of finite type. For any finite-rank map , the kernel of is locally of finite type by [F1] for ; choose a local finite-rank epimorphism . Exactness gives a map with . By [F1] for , is locally of finite type. On each stalk, maps onto : inclusion follows from , and if , then , so for some and ; injectivity of gives . Therefore is locally of finite type. Since this holds for every , is coherent.
Proof sources
Remarks
The extension case uses the exact sequence
Here is the monomorphism and the epimorphism in the given sequence. The proof establishes finite generation of and then its relation condition directly; the diagram only records the maps and exactness convention.