Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-dimensional Lorentz normalization cocycles split

Statement

Let l be the six-dimensional real Lie algebra with basis J1,J2,J3,K1,K2,K3 and brackets [Ji,Jj]=ϵijkJk, [Ji,Kj]=ϵijkKk, and [Ki,Kj]=−ϵijkJk, where ϵijk is the alternating symbol with ϵ123=1. This fixes the convention for so(1,3). Let V be a finite-dimensional complex vector space and let ρ:l→End⁡C(V) be a real-linear representation, meaning ρ([X,Y])=[ρ(X),ρ(Y)]. If a real-linear map c:l→V satisfies the Lie-algebra 1-cocycle identity

c([X,Y])=ρ(X)c(Y)−ρ(Y)c(X)(X,Y∈l),

then there is v∈V such that c(X)=ρ(X)v for every X∈l. No infinite-dimensional module, gauge cohomology, or interacting-field conclusion is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the real Lie algebra brackets, finite-dimensional complex representation ρ, and cocycle c exactly as specified in the Statement.

[A1]

By the complexification lC we mean l⊗RC with the complex-bilinear extension of the stated bracket; ρ and c extend complex-linearly.

[F1]

Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold, The round metric on the sphere as an induced metric, Riemannian volume density: the round metric on S3⊂R4 is induced by the Euclidean metric, and its volume density in coordinates with metric matrix G is det⁡G ∣dx1dx2dx3∣.

[F3]

A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage: if T:U→V is a C1 diffeomorphism between open subsets of R3 and f:R3→R is compactly supported Riemann integrable with supp⁡f⊆V, then the zero extension of f(T(x))∣det⁡DT(x)∣ from U is compactly supported Riemann integrable and has integral ∫R3f.

[L1]

Throughout this proof, a continuous complex-valued Riemann integrand is integrated by integrating its real and imaginary parts separately; a continuous finite-dimensional complex vector-valued integrand (including a matrix-valued one) is integrated coordinatewise in any basis. Real Riemann-sum linearity makes these integrals complex-linear and basis-independent. For continuous h and nonnegative continuous w, the Riemann-sum triangle inequality gives ∣∫wh∣≤sup⁡∣h∣∫w; nonnegative real integrands have nonnegative integral. [F2, algebra]

Proof

technique · direct

Given: [A1], [L1], and the hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1givenA1algebra

In lC set Li=(Ji+iKi)/2 and Ri=(Ji−iKi)/2. Expanding the stated brackets gives [Li,Lj]=ϵijkLk, [Ri,Rj]=ϵijkRk, and [Li,Rj]=0. The real span k=span⁡R{Li,Ri} has compact Lie-algebra bracket: with σ1=(0110), σ2=(0−ii0), σ3=(100−1), the basis −iσi/2 of su(2) has the same ϵijk brackets. The two summands commute, and k⊗RC=lC because Ji=Li+Ri and Ki=(Li−Ri)/i.

1.2F2givenconstruct

Let G=SU(2)×SU(2), whose Lie algebra is k. The matrices (ab−b‾a‾) with ∣a∣2+∣b∣2=1 parametrize SU(2)={M∈M2(C):M∗M=I,det⁡M=1} by (Re⁡a,Im⁡a,Re⁡b,Im⁡b)∈S3⊂R4, so G is compact. To prove simple connectivity in the form needed here, take any piecewise-smooth based loop in S3. Uniform continuity gives a finite subdivision on which each subarc lies in an open hemisphere. If δ(t) is the short great-circle arc between its endpoints, then H(s,t)=((1−s)γ(t)+sδ(t))/∥(1−s)γ(t)+sδ(t)∥ is defined throughout that hemisphere, fixes the endpoints, and homotopes the subarc to δ. Each great-circle arc lies in the intersection of S3 with a proper two-dimensional linear subspace Pj⊂R4. A finite union of proper linear subspaces cannot cover R4: induct on their number; after choosing x outside P1,…,Pn−1, if x∉Pn we are done, and otherwise choose y∉Pn; the line x+ty meets each Pj in at most one parameter value, so a real t outside the finite forbidden set gives a point outside all Pj. Thus the resulting polygonal loop omits some q∈S3. Stereographic projection identifies S3∖{q} with R3; straight-line contraction there to the basepoint fixes the loop endpoints and is piecewise smooth. Hence every piecewise-smooth based loop contracts through piecewise-smooth based loops. Applying this factorwise proves the required property for G.

2.1givenA1step 1.1algebra

Complexify ρ and c and, on W=V⊕C, define ρ~(X)(v,z)=(ρ(X)v+zc(X),0) for X∈k. The representation identity for ρ and the cocycle identity for c give [ρ~(X),ρ~(Y)](v,z)=([ρ(X),ρ(Y)]v+z(ρ(X)c(Y)−ρ(Y)c(X)),0)=ρ~([X,Y])(v,z), so ρ~ is a finite-dimensional Lie-algebra representation.

3.1L1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Reparameterize each smooth path segment to [0,1]. For a piecewise-smooth path γ put a(t)=γ(t)−1γ˙(t)∈k and A(t)=ρ~(a(t)). Solve U′=UA, U(0)=I, separately on each segment and concatenate. On a segment with ∥A∥≤M, the Picard series has nth term ∫0≤t1≤⋯≤tn≤tA(t1)⋯A(tn) dt1⋯dtn, bounded by Mn/n!; it converges uniformly and termwise integration verifies the integral equation. If D is the difference of two solutions with D(0)=0, then ∥D(t)∥≤M∫0t∥D(r)∥dr; iterating gives ∥D(t)∥≤sup⁡∥D∥Mntn/n!→0, proving uniqueness. Solving V′=−AV, V(0)=I, by the same series gives (UV)′=0 and UV=I, so each transport matrix is invertible. Concatenating paths multiplies their transports in order, since on the second segment the solution with initial value U1 is U1 times the solution with initial value I. For a piecewise-smooth endpoint-fixed homotopy Γ(s,t), the series terms and their s-derivatives are uniformly bounded by Mn/n! and nLMn−1/n!, respectively, where L=sup⁡∥∂sA∥ and we enlarge M so M≥1. Both series converge uniformly; integrating the derivative series in s shows the limit U is differentiable in s. Put a=Γ−1∂tΓ and b=Γ−1∂sΓ. Direct differentiation yields ∂sa−∂tb=[a,b]. The matrix-valued form θ=g−1dg satisfies dθ=−θ∧θ, by differentiating g−1g=I; equivalently dθ+12[θ,θ]=0. Applying the representation from step 2.1 gives As−Bt=[A,B], where B=ρ~(b). For K=Us−UB, differentiation now gives Kt=KA+U(BA+As−AB−Bt)=KA, and K(s,0)=0 because the initial endpoint is fixed. The uniqueness just proved gives K=0; at the fixed terminal endpoint B(s,1)=0, so Us(s,1)=0. Thus transport is invariant under these homotopies. If γ1,γ2 run from e to the same g, the loop γ1 followed by the reverse of γ2 contracts by step 1.2, so its transport is I; the analogous loop using γ2 shows the two transports agree. Hence transport is path-independent. Locally near g0, choose paths from e to g0−1g varying smoothly with g in a coordinate ball; the same uniform-series bounds imply continuous dependence on g, so U is continuous. Finally, left-translating a path from e to h and concatenating it after a path from e to g gives U(gh)=U(g)U(h), since left translation preserves γ−1γ˙. Thus U is a continuous group representation.

4.1F1F2F3L1step 1.2step 3.1construct

The block form of ρ~ makes U(g)=(R(g)b(g)01), and its group law gives b(hg)=R(h)b(g)+b(h). Use the matrix parametrization of S3 from step 1.2. For an explicit normalized round-volume integral, let χ(t)=0 for t≤1/3 and χ(t)=e−1/(t−1/3) for t>1/3. For x=(x1,…,x4)∈S3, put D(x)=∑j=14(χ(xj)+χ(−xj)) and ψj,±(x)=χ(±xj)/D(x). Since some ∣xj∣≥1/2, D(x)>0; these eight smooth nonnegative functions sum to 1 and have supports compactly contained in Uj,±={±xj>1/4}. In the chart given by the other three coordinates y, the sphere is xj=±1−∣y∣2, the metric matrix is G=I+yyT/(1−∣y∣2), and therefore det⁡G=(1−∣y∣2)−1/2. By [L1], integrate each complex chart integrand and each finite-dimensional V-valued function coordinatewise in any basis. Define I(f)=∑j,±∫R3ψj,±(x(y))f(x(y))(1−∣y∣2)−1/2 dy, extending each integrand by zero outside its chart. Each real and imaginary part is continuous with compact support inside the chart, so [F1]–[F2] make each coordinate integral finite. The chart weights are nonnegative, and their partition-of-unity sum gives I(1); applying the triangle inequality to the complex Riemann sums and passing to their limits gives ∣I(h)∣≤sup⁡S3∣h∣ I(1). The number I(1) is finite and positive: at x=(1,0,0,0) one partition function is positive on a neighborhood, and on a small coordinate cube there the integrand has a positive lower bound. Thus ν(h):=I(h)/I(1) is complex-linear, normalized, positive on nonnegative real functions, and satisfies ∣ν(h)∣≤sup⁡S3∣h∣. Its chart definition is independent of a finite subordinate chart partition: insert the second partition into each summand; each product has compact support in the chart overlap, and the metric identity G(x)=DT(x)TG(Tx)DT(x) gives det⁡G(x)=∣det⁡DT(x)∣det⁡G(Tx). The real and imaginary chart integrands, extended by zero, are continuous and compactly supported in the overlap image, and the transition is a smooth diffeomorphism of open subsets of R3. Apply the Riemann formula [F3] to these parts separately to transfer each compactly supported integral; summing the finite terms gives equality. For q=(a,b)∈S3 and x=(c,d)∈C2≅R4, matrix left multiplication induces Lq(c,d)=(ac−bd‾,ad+bc‾). This map is real-linear and ∣ac−bd‾∣2+∣ad+bc‾∣2=(∣a∣2+∣b∣2)(∣c∣2+∣d∣2)=∣c∣2+∣d∣2, since the two cross terms cancel. Its inverse is left multiplication by the inverse matrix, so Lq is orthogonal and an isometry of the induced metric; using the transported charts and partition in the same identity gives ν(h∘Lq)=ν(h). Extend ν to continuous V-valued maps by the same coordinatewise rule and call this extension νV. Define the product functional on continuous F:G→V by μ(F)=νV(q↦νV(r↦F(q,r))). For continuity, fix q0∈S3 and ε>0. For each r∈S3, continuity of the finitely many coordinate functions of F at (q0,r) gives neighborhoods in both factors on which their values differ from F(q0,r) by less than ε/3. Compactness of the second S3 selects finitely many such neighborhoods; intersecting their first-factor neighborhoods gives U∋q0 with sup⁡r∣Fj(q,r)−Fj(q0,r)∣<2ε/3 for each coordinate j and q∈U. The scalar bound for ν therefore makes each coordinate of q↦νV(r↦F(q,r)) continuous. The product functional is linear, normalized, and left invariant by applying the factor identity twice. Since b is continuous on compact G and V is finite-dimensional, vˉ:=μ(b) exists coordinatewise. Left invariance and the cocycle formula give R(h)vˉ+b(h)=μ(g↦b(hg))=vˉ for every h∈G.

5.1A1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Differentiate the fixed-point identity of step 4.1 at h=exp⁡(tX) and t=0. The path equation defining U gives dRe(X)=ρ(X) and dbe(X)=c(X): these are the upper-left and upper-right blocks of ρ~(X) in step 2.1. Hence ρ(X)vˉ+c(X)=0 for X∈k. Set v=−vˉ. The identity c(X)=ρ(X)v extends complex-linearly from k to lC by step 1.1, and hence holds for every original X∈l.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources