Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite lattice gauge data define an invariant probability

Statement

Assume ACω. Let V,E+,F be finite vertex, positively oriented edge, and face sets with endpoint maps s,t and based closed face words in the oriented edges, using the reverse-edge convention and traversal-ordered holonomy from the finite lattice definition above. Use its product smooth structures and empty-product convention. Let G be its compact finite-dimensional real Lie group, μG its normalized bi-invariant link probability, and Φp:G→R its continuous conjugation-invariant face actions. Then the vertex formulas (h⋅U)e=hs(e)Ueht(e)−1 define a smooth group action on GE+. Each face holonomy transforms by conjugation at its base vertex. Consequently the product link measure and the Boltzmann weight e−∑pΦp(Up) are gauge invariant, and the partition function satisfies 0<ZΛ<∞. Thus the normalized finite-lattice expectation is a well-defined gauge-invariant probability expectation. In L2 of that probability, the subspace of classes invariant under each vertex gauge transformation is closed. The infinitesimal Gauss generators defined by differentiating this smooth action are well-defined as directional derivatives on smooth functions.

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a finite oriented two-complex, a compact Lie group G, a normalized bi-invariant probability μG, and continuous class functions Φp.

[A1]

ACω is inherited through the supplied construction of g=TeG; the definition does not use arbitrary choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Finite non-Abelian lattice gauge data: one variable Ue∈G is assigned to each positively oriented edge, reverse edges carry Ue−1, vertices act by hs(e)Ueht(e)−1, and face holonomies are ordered products around closed edge words.

[F2]

Finite non-Abelian lattice gauge data: G is compact and μG is a normalized left- and right-invariant Borel probability; the face actions are continuous and conjugation invariant.

[F3]

The differential of a smooth map: the differential of a smooth map at a point sends tangent vectors at that point to tangent vectors at its image.

[F4]

A finite product of sigma-finite measure spaces carries the unique product measure on the product sigma-algebra, with the rectangle formula; a finite product of probability measures is again a probability measure. The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique

[F5]

A nonnegative measurable density defines a measure by integration, and a normalized finite density defines a probability measure. The measure with density f relative to μ Probability measures and probability spaces Measure space and integral

[F6]

The complex L2 class uses ∥[f]∥2=(∫∣f∣2 dPΛ)1/2 and the pairing ⟨[f],[g]⟩=∫fg‾ dPΛ; the cited result establishes representative-independence and norm properties. The complex L2 pairing on equivalence classes The complex L2 pairing is well-defined and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz

[F7]

The Lie group is second-countable, so its finite-product Borel sigma-algebra equals the product sigma-algebra; continuous face-holonomy, gauge-action, and density maps are measurable for these structures. Lie group Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces Borel sigma-algebra of a product of second-countable spaces

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenA1F1F3algebra

For h,k∈GV, applying k after h sends an edge e to ks(e)hs(e)Ueht(e)−1kt(e)−1=(kh)s(e)Ue(kh)t(e)−1; the identity tuple acts identically. Hence the formulas define a group action. The finite powers have the product smooth structures specified in the Definition, so each coordinate is a composition of smooth projections, multiplication, and inversion maps; the action map is smooth. By [F3], its differential sends the specified tangent vector at the identity of GV to a tangent vector at U; applying dfU therefore defines the stated directional derivative on every smooth f. The inherited axiom base is the stated ACω [A1].

2.1givenF1F2F4step 1.1algebra

Around a face word based at v0, the intermediate factors hvi−1hvi cancel, leaving Up(h⋅U)=hv0Up(U)hv0−1. Thus each Φp(Up) and the total action are unchanged. If E+=∅, the link space is the singleton empty tuple with unit point mass, and the action preserves this measure. Otherwise, for fixed h, the inverse image of a measurable rectangle ∏eAe under the link action is the rectangle ∏e(hs(e)−1Aeht(e)); bi-invariance preserves each factor measure. The product-measure rectangle formula and uniqueness therefore show that the finite link product measure is gauge invariant on the full product sigma-algebra.

3.1givenF2F4F5F7step 2.1algebra

For each face p and each g∈G, continuity of Φp gives an open neighborhood on which ∣Φp∣≤∣Φp(g)∣+1. Compactness of G gives a finite subcover, so each Φp is bounded; summing over the finite face set gives ∣SΛ(U)∣≤M for some finite M. By [F7], the action, SΛ, and its density are measurable; hence e−M≤e−SΛ(U)≤eM. Since the product link measure is a probability, e−M≤ZΛ≤eM; in particular 0<ZΛ<∞. The nonnegative density ZΛ−1e−SΛ therefore defines the normalized probability measure PΛ. Its invariance follows from the invariance of the product measure and of SΛ in step 2.1.

4.1F4F6step 3.1algebra∎

For each h∈GV, define Th[f]:=[U↦f(h−1⋅U)] on complex L2(PΛ), with norm ∥[f]∥2=(∫∣f∣2 dPΛ)1/2. Step 3.1 makes this well-defined and preserves the norm: invariance gives equality of integrals first for nonnegative simple functions and then, by the defining supremum for the nonnegative integral, for ∣f∣2. Thus each Th is a linear isometry. The invariant sector is exactly ⋂h∈GVker⁡(Th−I); each Th−I is continuous by the norm triangle inequality, so its kernel is closed, and an arbitrary intersection of closed sets is closed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources