Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact holomorphic hyperplane sequences for negative twists

Statement

For r≥1, let H={[Z0:⋯:Zr]∈Pr(C):Z0=0} and let i:H↪Pr(C) be inclusion. For every integer m, the homogeneous coordinate Z0 defines an exact sequence of holomorphic sheaves 0⟶OPr(m−1)→ ⋅Z0 OPr(m)⟶i∗OH(m)⟶0. Here i∗OH(m) assigns to an open set U the holomorphic sections of OH(m) on U∩H. Twisting the sequence with m=0 by OPr(−1) gives, in particular, 0⟶OPr(−2)⟶OPr(−1)⟶i∗OH(−1)⟶0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard projective charts, the coordinate hyperplane H, and the transition-defined twisting line bundles.

[F1]

On the affine chart Zj≠0, the projective coordinates are the holomorphic ratios Zi/Zj; on a chart with j≠0, the hyperplane H is the local coordinate divisor Z0/Zj=0. Complex projective space and its holomorphic charts

[F2]

The bundles OPr(m) are locally free line bundles with transition functions (Zi/Zj)m, and their restrictions to H have the corresponding twisting transitions. Projective twisting line bundles by coordinate transitions

Proof

Given: The projective charts and transition rules in [F1]–[F2].

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

On a chart Zj≠0 with j≠0, put w=Z0/Zj. In local frames of O(m−1) and O(m), multiplication by Z0 is multiplication by w up to the invertible frame factor. The holomorphic local ring has no zero divisors, so this map is injective on stalks. The quotient map is restriction to w=0. If a holomorphic germ f(u,w) restricts to zero there, then f(u,0)=0 and f(u,w)=w g(u,w),g(u,w)=∫01∂f∂w(u,tw) dt. On a sufficiently small polydisc the integrand is holomorphic in (u,w); its locally uniformly convergent power series may be integrated termwise, so g is holomorphic and the germ lies in (w). Thus the kernel of restriction is precisely the image of multiplication. On a chart not meeting H, the section Z0 is nowhere zero, so multiplication is an isomorphism and the quotient sheaf is zero. These stalk calculations prove exactness of the first sequence for every m.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Tensor the exact m=0 sequence by the locally free line bundle O(−1). Tensoring is exact because on each stalk this bundle is a free rank-one module. By the transition rule in [F2], its restriction to H is OH(−1); hence i∗OH⊗O(−1)≅i∗OH(−1) on each stalk. The resulting exact sequence is 0→OPr(−2)→OPr(−1)→i∗OH(−1)→0, as claimed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources