Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Raw monad full rank and ADHM regularity

Statement

Fix integers N≥1 and k≥0. Let V=Ck, W=CN, and let B1,B2∈End⁡(V), I:W→V, J:V→W satisfy [B1,B2]+IJ=0. Define for z=(z1,z2)∈C2 az=(B1−z1, B2−z2, J)T:V→V⊕V⊕W,bz†=(−B2+z2, B1−z1, I):V⊕V⊕W→V. Then az is injective for every z if and only if the datum is costable, and bz† is surjective for every z if and only if the datum is stable, where stability and costability have their word-span and invariant-subspace meanings. For the homogeneous linear maps

α=(B1λ1−B2†λ2−μ1, B2λ1+B1†λ2−μ2, Jλ1+I†λ2)T,

β=(−C, A, Iλ1−J†λ2),A=B1λ1−B2†λ2−μ1,C=B2λ1+B1†λ2−μ2, fiberwise injectivity of α and surjectivity of β on P3 imply regularity. Conversely, if the datum is regular and both raw moment maps vanish, then these homogeneous maps are fiberwise injective and surjective and form a linear bundle monad.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional ADHM maps and equations in the Statement.

[F1]

Stable means that the vectors Bi1⋯BimI(w) span V; costable means that no nonzero subspace invariant under both Bi is contained in ker⁡J. The raw moments use μC=[B1,B2]+IJ and μR=[B1,B1†]+[B2,B2†]+II†−J†J. ADHM linear data, stability, costability and FI levels

[F2]

If E is a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space and T:E→E, then det⁡(T−tI) is a nonconstant polynomial; the algebraic-closure theorem gives a root λ, so T−λI is singular and has a nonzero kernel vector. If T1,T2 commute, the eigenspace of T1 for any eigenvalue is nonzero and invariant under T2; applying the same argument to the restriction of T2 to that eigenspace gives a common eigenvector. The complex numbers are algebraically closed

Proof

Given: The complex moment equation, the raw stability and costability definitions, and the displayed maps.

1.1F1F2algebra

The adjoint of bz† is the column bz=(−B2†+zˉ2, B1†−zˉ1, I†)T. A covector v† annihilates the image of bz† exactly when Bi†v=zˉiv and I†v=0, equivalently v†Bi=ziv† and v†I=0. Such a nonzero covector annihilates every word vector Bi1⋯BimI(w), so stability implies surjectivity for every z. Conversely, if the word span Q is proper, it is invariant under both Bi and contains I(W). The complex moment equation makes the induced pair on V/Q commute, since IJ(V)⊆I(W)⊆Q. By [F2] its dual has a common eigenvector; pulling that covector back to V∗ gives v†I=0 and v†Bi=ziv† for some z, so bz† is not surjective.

1.2F1F2algebra

A nonzero vector in ker⁡az is a common eigenvector of B1,B2 contained in ker⁡J, so costability implies injectivity for every z. Conversely, if a nonzero common invariant subspace Q⊆ker⁡J exists, then IJ(Q)=0 and the complex moment equation gives [B1,B2]∣Q=0. The restrictions commute and have a common eigenvector by [F2]; this vector lies in ker⁡az for its eigenvalues z1,z2. Thus the two affine rank criteria are equivalent to stability and costability.

2.1givenstep 1.1step 1.2algebra

At the point [λ1:λ2:μ1:μ2]=[1:0:z1:z2], the displayed homogeneous maps reduce to α=az and β=bz†. If the homogeneous maps have their monad ranks at every projective point, step 1.1 gives stability and step 1.2 gives costability.

2.2F1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Now suppose both moments vanish and the datum is regular. Step 1.1–1.2 give surjectivity of bz† and injectivity of az for every finite z. Direct multiplication gives bz†az=μC=0,bz†bz−az†az=μR=0. Hence fz=az†az=bz†bz is positive definite. On the real line over z, α=azλ1+bzλ2 and β=bz†λ1−az†λ2; the cross Gram terms vanish by bz†az=0, so α†α=(∣λ1∣2+∣λ2∣2)fz and ββ†=(∣λ1∣2+∣λ2∣2)fz. Therefore both maps have full rank whenever (λ1,λ2)≠(0,0).

3.1F1step 2.2algebra

Every projective point with (λ1,λ2)≠(0,0) lies on a unique real twistor line: after conjugating the second incidence equation, the system for (z1,zˉ2) has matrix (λ1−λ2λˉ2λˉ1) and determinant ∣λ1∣2+∣λ2∣2>0. On the line at infinity (λ1=λ2=0) the maps are α=(−μ1,−μ2,0)T and β=(μ2,−μ1,0), which are injective and surjective respectively whenever (μ1,μ2)≠(0,0). Direct expansion gives

βα=λ12μC+λ1λ2μR−λ22μC†.

Thus the maps have the required ranks everywhere and compose to zero, so they form a bundle monad.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra∎

If k=0, then V=0, every endomorphism and map to or from V is the unique zero map, and the conditions of stability and costability both hold vacuously. The affine map az:0→W is injective and bz†:W→0 is surjective; the homogeneous source and target are zero, so their required ranks hold at every projective point. The moments vanish and the monad is 0→W⊗O→0. This verifies the zero-dimensional boundary case without using an eigenvector argument on the zero space.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources