How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Raw monad full rank and ADHM regularity
Statement
Fix integers and . Let , , and let , , satisfy . Define for Then is injective for every if and only if the datum is costable, and is surjective for every if and only if the datum is stable, where stability and costability have their word-span and invariant-subspace meanings. For the homogeneous linear maps
fiberwise injectivity of and surjectivity of on imply regularity. Conversely, if the datum is regular and both raw moment maps vanish, then these homogeneous maps are fiberwise injective and surjective and form a linear bundle monad.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-dimensional ADHM maps and equations in the Statement.
Stable means that the vectors span ; costable means that no nonzero subspace invariant under both is contained in . The raw moments use and . ADHM linear data, stability, costability and FI levels
If is a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space and , then is a nonconstant polynomial; the algebraic-closure theorem gives a root , so is singular and has a nonzero kernel vector. If commute, the eigenspace of for any eigenvalue is nonzero and invariant under ; applying the same argument to the restriction of to that eigenspace gives a common eigenvector. The complex numbers are algebraically closed
Proof
Given: The complex moment equation, the raw stability and costability definitions, and the displayed maps.
The adjoint of is the column . A covector annihilates the image of exactly when and , equivalently and . Such a nonzero covector annihilates every word vector , so stability implies surjectivity for every . Conversely, if the word span is proper, it is invariant under both and contains . The complex moment equation makes the induced pair on commute, since . By [F2] its dual has a common eigenvector; pulling that covector back to gives and for some , so is not surjective.
A nonzero vector in is a common eigenvector of contained in , so costability implies injectivity for every . Conversely, if a nonzero common invariant subspace exists, then and the complex moment equation gives . The restrictions commute and have a common eigenvector by [F2]; this vector lies in for its eigenvalues . Thus the two affine rank criteria are equivalent to stability and costability.
At the point , the displayed homogeneous maps reduce to and . If the homogeneous maps have their monad ranks at every projective point, step 1.1 gives stability and step 1.2 gives costability.
Now suppose both moments vanish and the datum is regular. Step 1.1–1.2 give surjectivity of and injectivity of for every finite . Direct multiplication gives Hence is positive definite. On the real line over , and ; the cross Gram terms vanish by , so and . Therefore both maps have full rank whenever .
Every projective point with lies on a unique real twistor line: after conjugating the second incidence equation, the system for has matrix and determinant . On the line at infinity the maps are and , which are injective and surjective respectively whenever . Direct expansion gives
Thus the maps have the required ranks everywhere and compose to zero, so they form a bundle monad.
If , then , every endomorphism and map to or from is the unique zero map, and the conditions of stability and costability both hold vacuously. The affine map is injective and is surjective; the homogeneous source and target are zero, so their required ranks hold at every projective point. The moments vanish and the monad is . This verifies the zero-dimensional boundary case without using an eigenvector argument on the zero space.