Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Graded Jacobi and real-form verification for the extended super-Poincare algebra

Statement

For N≥1, take S=C2, S˙=S‾, l=sl(S)⊕sl(S˙), V=S⊗S˙, CN=Λ2CN⊕Λ2CN‾, even part g0ˉ=l⊕V⊕CN, and odd part g1ˉ=(S⊗CN)⊕(S˙⊗(CN)∗). Give l its componentwise matrix commutator, its tensor action on V, and its fundamental actions on the two odd summands; let CN be central, V abelian and trivial on the odd part. With ϵ12=ϵ1˙2˙=1, the odd brackets are {QαI,Qˉβ˙J}=−2δIJTαβ˙, {QαI,QβJ}=2ϵαβZIJ, and {Qˉα˙I,Qˉβ˙J}=2ϵα˙β˙ZˉIJ, with ZIJ=−ZJI and all omitted brackets zero. Then this bracket is degree-preserving, graded-skew and satisfies the super-Jacobi identity. The conjugate-linear operation (A,B)∗=(−B‾,−A‾), Q∗=Qˉ, Qˉ∗=Q, Tαβ˙∗=Tβα˙, (ZIJ)∗=ZˉIJ and (ZˉIJ)∗=ZIJ is an involution satisfying [x,y]∗=−(−1)∣x∣∣y∣[x∗,y∗]. Consequently τ(x)=−x∗ on even elements and τ(x)=ix∗ on odd elements is an involutive conjugate-linear automorphism, and its fixed space is a real Lie superalgebra. For η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), σ0=I2, σj the Pauli matrices, and σˉ0=I2, σˉj=−σj, one has σμσˉν+σνσˉμ=−2ημνI2 and det⁡(σμpμ)=−ημνpμpν.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer N≥1, the finite-dimensional graded spaces, bracket table, adjoint operation and Pauli matrices specified above.

[F1]

Four-dimensional real extended super-Poincare algebra: g0ˉ=l⊕V⊕CN, g1ˉ=(S⊗CN)⊕(S˙⊗(CN)∗); l acts by matrix commutator, tensor action and the fundamental actions; V and CN are abelian, CN is central, and V acts trivially on the odd part; the three odd brackets and the star operation are exactly those in the Statement.

[F3]

Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus: if z=a+bi then z‾=a−bi; conjugation is conjugate-linear and involutive.

Proof

Given: The finite-dimensional graded space and operations in [F1], with the scalar field and conjugation in [F2]–[F3].

1.1F1algebra

The matrix commutators are antisymmetric and the odd-odd brackets are symmetric under interchange of the full generator labels: for the same-chirality bracket, ϵβαZJI=(−ϵαβ)(−ZIJ)=ϵαβZIJ, and the dotted case is identical. The mixed bracket is symmetric by its Kronecker delta and the graded-skew rule. Each listed bracket has parity equal to the sum of its input parities, so the bracket is degree-preserving and graded-skew.

1.2F1F2algebra

For matrices X,Y,Z, both X(YZ−ZY)−(YZ−ZY)X and (XY−YX)Z−Z(XY−YX)+Y(XZ−ZX)−(XZ−ZX)Y expand to XYZ−XZY−YZX+ZYX, so the commutator on l satisfies Jacobi. Write ρV(A,B)=A⊗I+I⊗B. Operators acting on different tensor factors commute, hence [ρV(A,B),ρV(A′,B′)]=[A,A′]⊗I+I⊗[B,B′]=ρV([(A,B),(A′,B′)]). For the odd action, [F1] uses column entries: [A,QαI]=∑γAγαQγI. Consequently [A,[A′,QαI]]−[A′,[A,QαI]]=∑δ(AA′−A′A)δαQδI=[ [A,A′],QαI], and the identical calculation applies to the dotted action of B. In particular, for A=E12, A′=E21 and q=Q1I, one has [A,q]=0, [A′,q]=Q2I, and both sides of this identity are q. The actions on CN and by V are zero. Thus l acts by representations on the abelian space V⊕CN and on g1ˉ; expanding the even Jacobi identity leaves precisely these representation identities, while brackets internal to V⊕CN vanish.

2.1F1step 1.2

For two even inputs and one odd input, the Jacobi expression is [ρ(L),ρ(L′)]q−ρ([L,L′])q, which is zero by the fundamental-action identities in [F1]; if either even input lies in V⊕CN, its odd action is zero and the same expression vanishes. This checks all orderings of the two-even/one-odd case by graded skew-symmetry.

2.2F1step 1.2algebra

For one even input L=(A,B) and two odd inputs, Jacobi is equivariance of their odd bracket. On a mixed pair, the two fundamental actions on Q and Qˉ give exactly A⊗I+I⊗B on T, so the mixed bracket is equivariant. On an equal-chirality pair, writing A=(abc−a) gives ATϵ+ϵA=0 by direct multiplication; the identical calculation for B preserves the dotted alternating form. The flavor tensors ZIJ and ZˉIJ are Lorentz scalars, so both central brackets are equivariant. Even inputs from V⊕CN act trivially on each side.

2.3F1F3step 1.1step 1.2

The given star squares to the identity on each generator. On the matrix-commutator bracket, entrywise conjugation preserves matrix multiplication and the minus signs in (A,B)∗ reverse the bracket; on the fundamental and tensor actions, star exchanges the two spinor factors and the corresponding minus sign gives [x,y]∗=−[x∗,y∗]. On odd-odd brackets, star exchanges Q with Qˉ, transposes the bispinor indices of T, and exchanges Z with Zˉ; the real alternating-form coefficients and antisymmetric flavor labels give [x,y]∗=[x∗,y∗], as required for two odd inputs. Zero brackets remain zero. For homogeneous even-even, even-odd and odd-odd inputs, substituting these identities into τ=−∗, i∗ and −∗ respectively gives τ([x,y])=[τx,τy]; conjugate-linearity gives τ2=I. Therefore the fixed space is closed under the bracket. Every x decomposes as x++ix− with x+=(x+τx)/2 and x−=(x−τx)/(2i) fixed by τ, so this fixed real algebra complexifies to the displayed graded algebra.

3.1F1step 2.1step 2.2

For three odd inputs, each inner bracket lies in V⊕CN. Both summands act trivially on the odd space, so each of the three terms in the odd-odd-odd super-Jacobi identity is zero. The four parity patterns checked in the preceding cases exhaust homogeneous triples, and multilinearity gives the identity for arbitrary triples.

4.1F1F2step 1.1∎

The Pauli matrices satisfy σiσj+σjσi=2δijI2 and tr⁡(σi)=0. For μ=ν=0 the sigma identity is 2I2=−2η00I2; for one temporal and one spatial index the two terms cancel; for spatial i,j their sum is −(σiσj+σjσi)=−2δijI2. Also (p0I2+piσi)2=(p02+∣p⃗∣2)I2+2p0piσi and direct 2×2 determinant expansion gives det⁡(p0I2+piσi)=p02−∣p⃗∣2=−ημνpμpν.

Remarks

The lemma verifies an algebraic construction. It proves neither the existence of an interacting quantum field theory nor the existence, stability or empirical observation of a supersymmetric particle state.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources