Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive-energy eigenspaces pair under an odd self-adjoint supercharge

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let H=H+⊕H− be a complex Hilbert space with grading operator Γ=+I on H+ and Γ=−I on H−. Let Q be a densely defined self-adjoint operator with domain invariant under Γ and QΓψ=−ΓQψ for every ψ∈D(Q). Set H=Q2 on the composition domain D(H)={ψ∈D(Q):Qψ∈D(Q)}. For each λ>0, let Eλ={ψ∈D(H):Hψ=λψ} be finite-dimensional, and put Eλ±=Eλ∩H±. Then Q maps Eλ into itself, and

Uλ:=(Q/λ)∣Eλ+:Eλ+⟶Eλ−

is a unitary isomorphism, with inverse (Q/λ)∣Eλ−. In particular dim⁡Eλ+=dim⁡Eλ−. Also Qψ=0 for every zero-energy vector ψ∈ker⁡H. No discrete spectrum or finite-multiplicity assumption is made about energies other than the selected λ.

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: H, Γ, Q, the composition operator H=Q2, and a finite-dimensional positive-energy eigenspace Eλ as in the Statement. Assume Countable Choice for the imported adjoint and self-adjoint definitions.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used by the imported unbounded adjoint and self-adjoint operator definitions. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length: the complex inner product is linear in its first argument, conjugate-linear in its second and positive definite.

[F2]

Hilbert space: H is complete in the norm induced by its complex inner product.

[F3]

Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension: the domain of a composition Q2 is {ψ∈D(Q):Qψ∈D(Q)}.

[F4]

Adjoint of a densely defined operator: self-adjointness gives ⟨Qx,y⟩=⟨x,Qy⟩ whenever x,y∈D(Q).

[F5]

Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators: a densely defined operator is self-adjoint when its domain agrees with the domain of its actual adjoint and the values agree.

[F6]
[F7]

C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2): the nonzero complex scalar λ has a multiplicative inverse and scalar multiplication is associative.

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F7], and the domain, grading and anticommutation hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

If ψ∈Eλ, then ψ∈D(Q), Qψ∈D(Q) and Q2ψ=λψ by [F3]. Thus Qψ∈D(Q) and Q(Qψ)=λψ∈D(Q), so a second application of [F3] gives Qψ∈D(H). Moreover H(Qψ)=Q(Q2ψ)=Q(λψ)=λQψ. Therefore Q maps Eλ into itself.

2.1givenF3step 1.1algebra

The domain of H is invariant under Γ: if ψ∈D(H), then Γψ∈D(Q) by hypothesis and QΓψ=−ΓQψ∈D(Q) because Qψ∈D(Q) and D(Q) is Γ-invariant. Applying the anticommutation relation twice gives HΓψ=ΓHψ. Hence ΓEλ=Eλ, and QΓ=−ΓQ shows that Q maps Eλ+ to Eλ− and Eλ− to Eλ+.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For ψ,φ∈Eλ, both vectors lie in D(Q) and Qψ∈D(Q), by [F2], the adjoint is taken in the complete Hilbert space; self-adjointness in [F5] and the identity in [F4] give ⟨Qψ,Qφ⟩=⟨Q2ψ,φ⟩=λ⟨ψ,φ⟩. By [F6], and since λ is nonzero in the complex field by [F7], division by λ therefore makes Q an isometry on Eλ. Also (Q/λ)2ψ=Q2ψ/λ=ψ there. Together with the parity exchange in step 2.1, this proves that the restriction Uλ:Eλ+→Eλ− is an isometry with inverse the restriction from Eλ− to Eλ+; it is consequently unitary and the finite dimensions agree.

4.1A1F1F2F4F5givenalgebra∎

If ψ∈ker⁡H, then ψ∈D(Q2), so Qψ∈D(Q). By [F2], [F5] and the adjoint identity [F4], ∥Qψ∥2=⟨Qψ,Qψ⟩=⟨Q2ψ,ψ⟩=0. Positive definiteness in [F1] forces Qψ=0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources