Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite matrix trace cyclicity and nondegeneracy

Statement

Let d,e≥1. For A∈Me×d(C) and B∈Md×e(C), Tr⁡e(AB)=Tr⁡d(BA), where Tr⁡r is the diagonal-sum trace on Mr(C). This includes cyclicity for square matrices. For C∈Md(C), the bilinear trace pairing is nondegenerate: if Tr⁡d(XC)=0 for every X∈Md(C), then C=0. No adjoint is inserted in this pairing.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers d,e≥1, rectangular matrices A∈Me×d(C), B∈Md×e(C), a matrix C∈Md(C), and standard matrix units Eij on Cd.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

By matrix multiplication and the diagonal-sum trace, Tr⁡e(AB)=∑i=1e∑j=1dAijBji. These are finite scalar sums, so reordering them gives ∑j=1d∑i=1eBjiAij=Tr⁡d(BA). Taking e=d gives square trace cyclicity.

2.1givenalgebra∎

If Tr⁡d(XC)=0 for all X, choose X=Eij. Direct multiplication gives Tr⁡d(EijC)=Cji, so Cji=0 for every i,j. Thus every matrix entry of C vanishes and C=0.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources