How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Volume-independent finite-range commutator path bound
Statement
Let be an interaction of Uniformly bounded finite-range quantum spin interaction with parameters . Let , let be finite, let be finite and nonempty, and let be any finite nonempty set. Take and , with both embedded in the common finite algebra . Then for every ,
Here the finite-volume dynamics is extended by the identity on sites outside , as in Uniformly bounded finite-range quantum spin interaction. The parameter is measured per lattice step in the dimensionless max-coordinate metric. The bound is uniform over finite volumes containing ; it is an operator-norm estimate for the stipulated spin model, not a relativistic light cone.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , finite , , a finite-range interaction with , , and , a finite volume , nonempty , finite nonempty , and , embedded in .
Uniformly bounded finite-range quantum spin interaction: each is a self-adjoint local matrix, nonzero only for and , and .
Local spin matrix algebras and their factor inclusions: each finite-region algebra is a finite-dimensional matrix algebra with its induced operator norm; operators in disjoint tensor factors commute.
Local spin factor inclusions preserve the operator norm: the factor inclusion is an isometric unital -homomorphism, so local norms agree in larger finite volumes.
Proof
Given: The interaction, finite-volume dynamics, local matrix norms, and support hypotheses above.
Fix and define for every nonempty , with all operators viewed in . For , put and . The finite matrix exponential is unitary because its adjoint is and the two commuting exponential series multiply to ; hence ranges over all of and preserves norm. Differentiating finite matrix exponentials and using the Jacobi identity, the terms contained in cancel and the terms disjoint from commute with . With , the remaining commutator satisfies For the homogeneous equation, the finite matrix ODE has a solution on every compact interval: its Picard series converges uniformly because the th iterated integral is bounded by . Each is self-adjoint, so differentiating gives zero; since , . In finite dimension this makes unitary, so conjugation by its propagator preserves the matrix norm. This argument also applies after reversing the time parameter, because the reversed homogeneous generator is still skew-adjoint. Set if and if , and write for . The equation for has homogeneous commutator generated by and a source multiplied by ; the source sign does not change its norm. Variation of constants therefore gives the same norm estimate for either sign of , with intermediate dynamics evaluated at signed times: We enlarged the sum from crossing terms to all terms meeting , which only increases its nonnegative right-hand side.
Iterate this integral inequality. All intermediate times retain sign ; in absolute-time parameters the iterated region is , whose volume is . Thus the same factorial weights apply for either sign of time. The zero-length term is at most . A length- contribution, , is a chain with , , and , weighted by and . The first interaction sum is at most ; each later sum is at most , so the total length- weight is at most . After iterations, the unresolved remainder is bounded by ; it tends to zero. Hence no infinite path expansion is assumed without convergence.
If , any contributing length- chain satisfies : choose a site in each successive nonempty intersection and apply the triangle inequality, using at each of the steps. Thus its indicator is at most . Since , . Summing the resulting exponential series gives If , then the distance is zero and the zero-length term together with the same series is bounded by . In either case, multiplying by proves the stated estimate.
Remarks
The path expansion counts support incidence, not a trajectory of a particle. The schematic below shows a length-three chain; every arrow means that the adjacent support sets intersect, and each interaction support has max-metric diameter at most . It records the incidence pattern only. The proof uses the stated metric triangle inequality, not the drawing.
diagram failed to render:
\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth]
\node (x) at (0,0) {$X$};
\node (z1) at (2,0) {$Z_1$};
\node (z2) at (4,0) {$Z_2$};
\node (z3) at (6,0) {$Z_3$};
\node (y) at (8,0) {$Y$};
\draw[->] (x) -- node[above] {$\cap\ne\varnothing$} (z1);
\draw[->] (z1) -- node[above] {$\cap\ne\varnothing$} (z2);
\draw[->] (z2) -- node[above] {$\cap\ne\varnothing$} (z3);
\draw[->] (z3) -- node[above] {$\cap\ne\varnothing$} (y);
\end{tikzpicture}