Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit separable state at the Pauli dimer boundary

Statement

For n∈{±ex,±ey,±ez}, with the standard vectors from Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator, put ρn=(I+nxσx+nyσy+nzσz)/2. The matrix ρ∗:=16∑n∈{±ex,±ey,±ez}ρn⊗ρ−n=14(I4−13C) is a separable two-qubit density matrix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Pauli matrices, the qubit positivity criterion, and the finite-convex-product definition of separability.

[F1]

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: the three Pauli matrices are Hermitian, square to I, ex,ey,ez are the standard unit vectors of R3, and C=∑jσj⊗σj.

[F2]

Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability: a finite convex combination of product qubit density matrices is separable.

[F3]

Bloch-ball representation of a qubit density matrix: (I+a⋅σ)/2 is a qubit density matrix whenever a∈R3 and ∣a∣≤1.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Each vector n in the six-term sum has exactly one coordinate equal to 1 or −1 and the others zero, so the Euclidean norm in [F1] gives ∣n∣=1. Thus [F3] makes ρn and ρ−n qubit density matrices. The six terms have nonnegative equal weights 1/6 summing to one; [F2] therefore proves that ρ∗ is separable.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

For a fixed axis ej, direct expansion gives ρej⊗ρ−ej+ρ−ej⊗ρej=12(I4−σj⊗σj). Summing this identity over j=x,y,z and dividing by six yields ρ∗=14I4−112C=14(I4−C/3), as claimed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources