Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite Pauli dimer spectrum and exact separability threshold

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page develops the finite two-qubit Pauli exchange matrix, a local Bloch-coordinate and separability calculus, and the exact zero-field Gibbs separability threshold. The physical dimer then uses the explicit Hamiltonian H=JC−h(σz⊗I+I⊗σz), with J,h in joules and β in J−1. Its field coefficient and eigenlevels are derived in this convention; the external dimer sources use their own field normalizations. The exact entanglement boundary is a finite-state property, not a thermodynamic singularity.

The page also covers a periodic quantum Ising model and a global three-sector countermodel. The Ising construction is diagonal in the product Pauli-z basis and reproduces the stated one-dimensional classical finite-ring law, without extending to general noncommuting lattices. The three-sector model is explicitly non-product-additive and remains outside claims about local or short-range matter. The onsite Bose and Fermi calculations are exact one-site models; the interacting Bose trace is proved from its quadratic occupation-energy tail, not from the free-mode product trace formula.

The mathematical spectrum and separability results use only mathematical prerequisites. Physical conclusions are conditional model deductions; no measurements, thermalization mechanism, or material-specific behavior is asserted.

For J>0 and zero field, the following level sketch shows only the relative energies from Interacting Heisenberg dimer Gibbs model. The vertical coordinate is energy in units of J; horizontal positions distinguish the singlet from the triplet and carry no further scale. The proof uses the exact eigenvalue calculation, not this drawing.

\begin{tikzpicture}[x=2.2cm,y=0.75cm]
  \draw[->] (-0.35,-3.6) -- (-0.35,1.7) node[above] {$E/J$};
  \draw[thick] (0,-3) -- (0.65,-3);
  \draw[thick] (1.4,1) -- (2.05,1);
  \node[left] at (0,-3) {$-3$};
  \node[right] at (2.05,1) {$+1$ (triplet, multiplicity $3$)};
  \node[below] at (0.32,-3.25) {singlet};
  \draw[<->] (0.85,-3) -- (0.85,1) node[midway,right] {$4J$};
\end{tikzpicture}

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator

Definition

Use the usual complex field C; its scalar metric is dC(z,w)=∣z−w∣ from The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane. On C2, use the standard basis e0=(1,0), e1=(0,1) and inner product ⟨x,y⟩=x0y0‾+x1y1‾, linear in its first variable. On R3, define a⋅b:=axbx+ayby+azbz, ∣a∣:=a⋅a using the unique nonnegative square root from Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a, and the standard unit vectors ex=(1,0,0), ey=(0,1,0), and ez=(0,0,1).

For a finite complex matrix A=(ajk), define its adjoint by A∗:=(akj‾)j,k=A‾ T, where the bar is entrywise complex conjugation from Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus and T is transpose. The matrix is Hermitian exactly when A=A∗. For vectors u,v in a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space V with the stated linear-first convention, define the rank-one operator ∣u⟩⟨v∣:V→V by

∣u⟩⟨v∣(x):=⟨x,v⟩u.

This action is linear in x under the linear-first convention.

Use the ordered tensor-product basis (e0⊗e0,e0⊗e1,e1⊗e0,e1⊗e1) of C2⊗C2. Its inner product is the linear-first product inner product, specified on elementary tensors by ⟨u⊗v,u′⊗v′⟩=⟨u,u′⟩⟨v,v′⟩ and extended sesquilinearly. For two 2×2 matrices A,B, their tensor product acts by (A⊗B)(u⊗v)=Au⊗Bv and is extended linearly.

On elementary tensors this definition gives (A1⊗B1)(A2⊗B2)=(A1A2)⊗(B1B2). The product inner product also gives (A⊗B)∗=A∗⊗B∗: both sides have the adjoint pairing on elementary tensors, and those tensors span the product space.

Write I2:=(1001) for the identity on C2, use I:=I2 when its domain is clear, and set I4:=I2⊗I2. Define the everywhere-defined matrices

σx=(0110),σy=(0−ii0),σz=(100−1).

Define the dimensionless exchange matrix

C:=σx⊗σx+σy⊗σy+σz⊗σz.

Direct conjugate-transpose and multiplication of the displayed matrices give σx∗=σx, σy∗=σy, σz∗=σz, and σx2=σy2=σz2=I2. In the ordered tensor-product basis,

C=(10000−12002−100001),

so C∗=C as well. These matrices have their full finite-dimensional domains. For a finite matrix A, tr⁡(A) denotes the sum of its diagonal entries in the displayed basis.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability

Definition

Use the single-qubit space and ordered two-qubit basis from Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator. A one-qubit density matrix is a Hermitian 2×2 matrix ρ such that ⟨ρx,x⟩≥0 for every x∈C2 and tr⁡(ρ)=1. A two-qubit density matrix is defined in the same way on C2⊗C2, using the four-dimensional trace.

The tensor product of two one-qubit density matrices is again a two-qubit density matrix. To verify positivity, write any positive semidefinite Hermitian matrix as R=(azz‾b); testing the quadratic form on the two coordinate vectors gives a,b≥0. If a>0, completing the square gives

⟨R(x,y),(x,y)⟩=a∣x+zay∣2+(b−∣z∣2a)∣y∣2,

so positivity implies b−∣z∣2/a≥0 and

R=S∗S,S=(az/a0b−∣z∣2/a).

If a=0, positivity forces z=0: if z≠0, choose y=1 and x=−tz with real t>b/(2∣z∣2), giving quadratic form b−2t∣z∣2<0. Then R=S∗S for S=diag⁡(0,b). The nonnegative square roots exist by Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a through the preceding matrix conventions. Thus for one-qubit densities ρA=SA∗SA and ρB=SB∗SB, the tensor-product adjoint identity from Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator gives

ρA⊗ρB=(SA⊗SB)∗(SA⊗SB),

which is Hermitian and positive semidefinite. In the displayed product basis, tr⁡(X⊗Y)=∑i,j=01XiiYjj=tr⁡(X)tr⁡(Y) for 2×2 matrices X,Y. Therefore tr⁡(ρA⊗ρB)=1.

A product density matrix is ρA⊗ρB for one-qubit density matrices ρA,ρB. A two-qubit density matrix is separable if it is a finite convex combination ∑j=1mtjρA,j⊗ρB,j, where tj≥0 and ∑j=1mtj=1; these convex combinations are again density matrices by linearity of the trace and quadratic form. A two-qubit density matrix that is not separable is entangled. This finite-convex-combination convention is the one used by the local threshold proof.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Spectrum of the two-qubit Pauli exchange matrix

Statement

For C from Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator, “v is an eigenvector with eigenvalue λ” has the exact meaning from Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI), and the spectrum σF(T) of an endomorphism: v≠0 and Cv=λv. The singlet vector s=(e0⊗e1−e1⊗e0)/2 has eigenvalue −3, and the three orthonormal triplet vectors e0⊗e0, (e0⊗e1+e1⊗e0)/2, and e1⊗e1 have eigenvalue 1. Here 2 is the unique positive square root supplied by Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a. These four vectors are an orthonormal basis of C2⊗C2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The explicit Pauli matrices, exchange matrix, and ordered basis of Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator.

[F1]

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: C=σx⊗σx+σy⊗σy+σz⊗σz in the displayed tensor-product basis.

[F2]

Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a: 2 is the unique positive real number whose square is 2.

[F3]

Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI), and the spectrum σF(T) of an endomorphism: for a linear map T, an eigenvalue λ has a nonzero eigenvector v satisfying T(v)=λv.

Proof

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Applying the three tensor products in [F1] to the ordered basis (00,01,10,11) gives the matrix with outer diagonal entries 1,1, middle block (−122−1), and all other entries zero.

2.1givenF2F3step 1.1algebra∎

The outer basis vectors are eigenvectors with eigenvalue 1. The middle block sends (01−10)/2 to −3(01−10)/2 and (01+10)/2 to (01+10)/2. Since (2)2=2, each displayed middle vector has squared norm (1+1)/2=1; their inner product is (1−1)/2=0. They are also orthogonal to 00,11, so together the four nonzero eigenvectors form an orthonormal basis and give the full spectrum.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Bloch-ball representation of a qubit density matrix

Statement

Every Hermitian trace-one 2×2 matrix ρ has a unique vector a=(ax,ay,az)∈R3 such that

ρ=12(I+axσx+ayσy+azσz).

Conversely, for every a∈R3 this formula defines a Hermitian trace-one matrix, and that matrix is positive semidefinite exactly when ∣a∣≤1, where ∣a∣=a⋅a is the Euclidean norm defined in Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator. Thus the one-qubit density matrices of Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability are exactly the displayed matrices with ∣a∣≤1. Their coordinates are aj=tr⁡(ρσj).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Pauli matrices and trace convention of Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator, and the definition of a one-qubit density matrix in Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability.

[F1]

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: the Pauli matrices are the displayed Hermitian matrices; a⋅b=axbx+ayby+azbz, ∣a∣=a⋅a, and matrix trace is the sum of diagonal entries.

[F2]

Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability: a one-qubit density matrix is Hermitian, positive semidefinite, and has trace one.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

Write ρ=(uzz‾1−u), where u∈R because ρ is Hermitian and the lower diagonal entry is fixed by tr⁡ρ=1. Set ax=2Re⁡z, ay=−2Im⁡z, and az=2u−1. Direct substitution of the displayed Pauli matrices gives ρ=12(I+axσx+ayσy+azσz). Direct multiplication gives tr⁡(ρσj)=aj for each j, so the entries of ρ force uniqueness and each coefficient is real.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The constructed matrix is ρa=(pww‾q) with p=(1+az)/2, q=(1−az)/2, and w=(ax−iay)/2. Its quadratic form at (x,y) is p∣x∣2+wyx‾+w‾xy‾+q∣y∣2. If p>0, completing the square gives p∣x+(w/p)y∣2+(q−∣w∣2/p)∣y∣2, so positivity is equivalent to q−∣w∣2/p≥0. If p=0, positivity forces w=0 (otherwise choosing y=1 and x=−tw for sufficiently large t>0 makes the quadratic form negative), and then is equivalent to q≥0. In both cases the criterion is p,q≥0 and pq≥∣w∣2. Here pq−∣w∣2=(1−ax2−ay2−az2)/4=(1−∣a∣2)/4. Thus ∣a∣≤1 implies the criterion, and the criterion implies ∣a∣≤1. Hence ρa is positive semidefinite exactly on the closed unit ball.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Pauli exchange expectation bound for separable states

Statement

For every separable two-qubit density matrix ρ and exchange operator C from Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator, tr⁡(ρC)≥−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Pauli exchange operator, qubit Bloch coordinates, the qubit positivity criterion, and the finite-convex-product definition of separability.

[F1]

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: C=∑j=x,y,zσj⊗σj.

[F2]

Bloch-ball representation of a qubit density matrix: every qubit density matrix has a Bloch vector a∈R3 with ∣a∣≤1.

[F3]

Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability: every separable ρ is a finite convex combination of product density matrices.

[F4]

Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs: for the real Euclidean inner product on R3, ∣a⋅b∣≤∣a∣ ∣b∣.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4algebra

For matrices A1,B1,A2,B2∈M2(C), the tensor action on elementary product-basis vectors gives (A1⊗B1)(A2⊗B2)=(A1A2)⊗(B1B2), and the four diagonal entries in that basis give tr⁡(X⊗Y)=∑r,s=01XrrYss=tr⁡(X)tr⁡(Y). Therefore, for qubit densities ρA,ρB with Bloch vectors a,b, tr⁡((ρA⊗ρB)C)=∑j=x,y,ztr⁡(ρAσj)tr⁡(ρBσj)=a⋅b. By [F4] and [F2], a⋅b≥−∣a∣∣b∣≥−1.

2.1givenF3step 1.1algebra∎

Write a separable ρ as ∑k=1mpkρkA⊗ρkB as in [F3]. Linearity of the trace and step 1.1 give tr⁡(ρC)=∑kpktr⁡((ρkA⊗ρkB)C)≥∑kpk(−1)=−1.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Explicit separable state at the Pauli dimer boundary

Statement

For n∈{±ex,±ey,±ez}, with the standard vectors from Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator, put ρn=(I+nxσx+nyσy+nzσz)/2. The matrix ρ∗:=16∑n∈{±ex,±ey,±ez}ρn⊗ρ−n=14(I4−13C) is a separable two-qubit density matrix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Pauli matrices, the qubit positivity criterion, and the finite-convex-product definition of separability.

[F1]

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: the three Pauli matrices are Hermitian, square to I, ex,ey,ez are the standard unit vectors of R3, and C=∑jσj⊗σj.

[F2]

Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability: a finite convex combination of product qubit density matrices is separable.

[F3]

Bloch-ball representation of a qubit density matrix: (I+a⋅σ)/2 is a qubit density matrix whenever a∈R3 and ∣a∣≤1.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Each vector n in the six-term sum has exactly one coordinate equal to 1 or −1 and the others zero, so the Euclidean norm in [F1] gives ∣n∣=1. Thus [F3] makes ρn and ρ−n qubit density matrices. The six terms have nonnegative equal weights 1/6 summing to one; [F2] therefore proves that ρ∗ is separable.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

For a fixed axis ej, direct expansion gives ρej⊗ρ−ej+ρ−ej⊗ρej=12(I4−σj⊗σj). Summing this identity over j=x,y,z and dividing by six yields ρ∗=14I4−112C=14(I4−C/3), as claimed.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Finite Pauli dimer spectrum and exact separability threshold

Statement

Use C from Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator, with singlet projection Ps=∣s⟩⟨s∣ and triplet projection Pt=I4−Ps, where s=(e0⊗e1−e1⊗e0)/2. For each dimensionless x≥0, define the finite two-qubit density matrix ρx:=e3xPs+e−xPte3x+3e−x. Then ρx is separable exactly when x≤(log⁡3)/4, and it is entangled exactly when x>(log⁡3)/4. In particular, the equality state at x=(log⁡3)/4 is separable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Pauli matrices and exchange operator, the singlet/triplet eigenspaces, the finite density and separability definitions, and the dimensionless parameter x≥0.

[F1]

Spectrum of the two-qubit Pauli exchange matrix and Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: the singlet s is a unit vector, the three triplets form an orthonormal basis of s⊥, and C has eigenvalue −3 on s and eigenvalue 1 on that triplet space. The rank-one convention gives Psx=⟨x,s⟩s, so Ps is the orthogonal projection onto Cs and Pt=I4−Ps is the orthogonal projection onto the triplet space; their ranks are one and three.

[F2]

Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability: a density matrix is Hermitian, positive semidefinite, and has trace one.

[F3]

Bloch-ball representation of a qubit density matrix: the Bloch-coordinate matrix with vector a=0 is the positive trace-one matrix I2/2.

[F4]

Finite two-qubit density matrices and separability: a separable two-qubit density matrix is a finite convex combination of product qubit density matrices.

[F5]

Pauli exchange expectation bound for separable states: every separable two-qubit density matrix has tr⁡(ρC)≥−1.

[F6]

Explicit separable state at the Pauli dimer boundary: ρ∗=14(I4−C/3) is separable.

[F7]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The real exponential function and the number e by a power series, and Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: log⁡ is the inverse of the strictly increasing real exponential on positive reals, so e4x>3 is equivalent to x>(log⁡3)/4.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The projections Ps,Pt are orthogonal and have ranks one and three by [F1]. Their weighted sum in the definition of ρx is therefore positive, and its trace is e3x+3e−x>0; division normalizes its trace to one. By [F2] this is a two-qubit density matrix. Its singlet probability is ps=e3x/(e3x+3e−x)=e4x/(e4x+3).

2.1givenF1F7step 1.1algebra

Using the two eigenvalues in [F1], tr⁡(ρxC)=−3ps+(1−ps)=1−4ps=3(1−e4x)/(e4x+3)=:c. For x≥0, e4x≥1, hence −3≤c≤0, and c<−1 exactly when e4x>3, equivalently x>(log⁡3)/4 by [F7].

3.1givenF5step 2.1

If x>(log⁡3)/4, step 2.1 gives tr⁡(ρxC)=c<−1. This contradicts the lower bound [F5] satisfied by every separable state, so ρx is entangled.

4.1givenF1F3F4F6step 2.1algebra∎

If 0≤x≤(log⁡3)/4, step 2.1 gives −1≤c≤0. The spectral projections in [F1] give ρx=14(I4+(c/3)C); substituting [F6] yields ρx=(−c)ρ∗+(1+c)I4/4. Both coefficients are nonnegative and sum to one; [F3] makes I2/2 a qubit density matrix, so I4/4=(I2/2)⊗(I2/2) is a product density matrix. Thus [F4] and [F6] make ρx separable, including at equality c=−1.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Interacting Heisenberg dimer Gibbs model

Physical scope

The finite two-spin Hilbert space C^2 tensor C^2 with the isotropic Pauli exchange Hamiltonian and a uniform z-field, at positive temperature. The exact separability threshold is asserted only at zero field for J>0. There is no measurement, thermalization, material-specific, or infinite-volume claim.

Statement

Let e0,e1 and σx,σy,σz,C be as in Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator, with σze0=e0 and σze1=−e1. By Spectrum of the two-qubit Pauli exchange matrix, the normalized singlet s=(e0⊗e1−e1⊗e0)/2 has C-eigenvalue −3, and the three orthonormal triplets have eigenvalue 1. Adopt the two-spin Hamiltonian as a finite matrix on C2⊗C2, with full domain D(HJ,h)=C2⊗C2: HJ,h:=JC−h(σz⊗I+I⊗σz), where J,h∈R are energies in joules. For inverse temperature β>0 in J−1, use the canonical Gibbs preparation only after normalizing its finite trace. Its singlet energy is −3J; its triplet energies are J−2h, J, and J+2h. Here cosh⁡y:=(ey+e−y)/2. Z(β,J,h)=e3βJ+e−βJ(1+2cosh⁡(2βh))>0. At h=0 and J>0, the Gibbs density matrix is entangled exactly when βJ>(log⁡3)/4, and is separable at and below equality. This exact threshold is a finite-state quantum-model conclusion. For every fixed J,h, Z and the free energy −β−1log⁡Z are real analytic for β>0; the entanglement threshold is not a finite-temperature thermodynamic singularity. At zero field the entropy tends to 0 as β→∞ for J>0, to kBlog⁡3 for J<0, and to kBlog⁡4 for J=0. For J>0, a nonzero field makes the singlet and the field-aligned triplet cross at ∣h∣=2J at zero temperature; this ground-space crossing does not make Z singular at finite positive temperature.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite Hilbert space and Pauli conventions in the Statement; J,h are in joules, β>0 is in J−1, and kB>0 is in J K−1.

[A1]

Quantum statistics and model equilibrium preparation: adopt the canonical state ρ=Z−1e−βH only when its trace is finite and positive; this is a model preparation assumption, not a thermalization claim.

[F1]

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: C=∑j=x,y,zσj⊗σj, and each Pauli matrix acts on all of C2.

[F2]

Spectrum of the two-qubit Pauli exchange matrix: the normalized singlet has C-eigenvalue −3, while the three orthonormal triplets have eigenvalue 1.

[F3]

Finite Pauli dimer spectrum and exact separability threshold: for the zero-field two-qubit Gibbs density with dimensionless x=βJ≥0, separability holds exactly for x≤(log⁡3)/4.

[F6]

Real-analytic functions are closed under sums, products and compositions, and under quotients where the denominator is nonzero: sums, products, compatible compositions, and quotients with nonzero denominator preserve real analyticity.

[F7]

Real analytic inverse and implicit functions and The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡: a real analytic map with nonzero derivative has a real analytic local inverse, and exp⁡′(y)=exp⁡(y).

[F8]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function: log⁡ is the inverse of exp⁡ on (0,∞).

[F9]

The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞: for fixed Δ>0, βe−βΔ→0 as β→∞.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

In the ordered basis e0e0,e0e1,e1e0,e1e1, the field operator σz⊗I+I⊗σz has eigenvalues 2,0,0,−2. The middle two basis vectors combine into the singlet and the m=0 triplet of [F2]; both have field eigenvalue 0. The outer vectors are the m=+1 and m=−1 triplets, with field eigenvalues 2 and −2. Thus the singlet and triplet basis from [F2] is a common orthonormal eigenbasis for C and the field operator. The displayed real eigenvalues make HJ,h self-adjoint on its full domain C2⊗C2; the singlet energy is −3J and the triplet energies are J−2h,J,J+2h.

2.1givenA1F3step 1.1algebra

The canonical trace is the sum of the four positive weights associated with step 1.1. It is therefore finite and positive, and the adopted preparation [A1] gives the displayed partition function. At h=0 and J>0, setting x=βJ identifies its normalized state with ρx in [F3], so that theorem gives the exact separability and entanglement alternatives, including the equality case.

2.2A1F2F9step 1.1algebra

Fix J,h and let Emin⁡ be the least of the four energies from step 1.1, with multiplicity g. Write the other energies as Emin⁡+Δi with Δi>0. After factoring out e−βEmin⁡, the denominator is Dβ=g+∑ie−βΔi→g and 1≤Dβ≤4. The Gibbs probability of each ground vector is 1/Dβ, so the total ground entropy tends to −kBg(1/g)log⁡(1/g)=kBlog⁡g. For an excited vector, pi=e−βΔi/Dβ and −pilog⁡pi=pi(βΔi+log⁡Dβ)≤e−βΔi(βΔi+log⁡4); this tends to zero by [F9], so the finite sum of excited entropy terms vanishes. At h=0, the triplet is the three-dimensional ground space for J<0, all four levels coincide for J=0, and the singlet is the unique ground state for J>0, giving the stated limits.

3.1givenF4F5F6F7F8step 1.1step 2.1

Fix J,h and any β0>0. For each of the four energies E from step 1.1, the addition formula [F4] gives e−βE=e−β0E∑n≥0[−E(β−β0)]n/n!, a convergent power series about β0. The four-term sum Z(β) is therefore real analytic near β0 by [F5]–[F6], and Z(β0)>0 by step 2.1. Put y0=log⁡Z(β0). By [F8], exp⁡(y0)=Z(β0); by [F7], exp⁡′(y0)=exp⁡(y0)=Z(β0)≠0. The real analytic inverse theorem gives a local analytic inverse to exp⁡ near Z(β0), and [F8] identifies that inverse with log⁡. The composition clause of [F6] now makes log⁡Z real analytic near β0. Since β0 was arbitrary, −β−1log⁡Z is real analytic for every β>0: the identity and constant functions have local polynomial series, so the quotient clause of [F6] makes β↦β−1 analytic on this domain. Thus the finite-volume free energy has no singularity at the entanglement threshold.

4.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For J>0, the lowest triplet energy is J−2∣h∣. It equals the singlet energy −3J exactly at ∣h∣=2J. The two energy levels can cross as parameters vary, but step 2.1 is a strictly positive finite sum of exponentials at every β>0, so this zero-temperature ground-space crossing creates no finite-temperature singularity.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Commuting quantum Ising and nonadditive phase countermodel

Physical scope

Two explicit finite-dimensional quantum models: a periodic diagonal one-dimensional Ising Hamiltonian and a global N-dependent three-sector Hamiltonian. The first has the exact specified one-dimensional classical correspondence; the second is deliberately non-product-additive. No generic noncommuting lattice theorem or short-range phase claim is asserted.

Statement

Periodic commuting Ising model. For N≥2, let HN=(C2)⊗N with its product inner product, and let Zi act as σz on tensor factor i and as identity on the others; each Zi acts on all of HN. With periodic indexing ZN+1=Z1, count exactly the N indexed bonds, so N=2 has two bonds. For real energies J,h and β>0 in J−1, adopt the finite matrix HNq=−J∑i=1NZiZi+1−h∑i=1NZi,D(HNq)=HN. For each site set ∣+1⟩:=e0 and ∣−1⟩:=e1, so σz∣si⟩=si∣si⟩; define ∣s1,…,sN⟩:=∣s1⟩⊗⋯⊗∣sN⟩. Its energy equals HNcl(s)=−J∑isisi+1−h∑isi. Thus the quantum Gibbs density is diagonal in this basis, and its partition function and diagonal probabilities agree exactly with the specified classical finite ring. In particular, when J≥0 and h=0, its σz correlations are those of Finite periodic Ising-ring correlations and exact decay. Use sinh⁡x=(ex−e−x)/2, cosh⁡x=(ex+e−x)/2, and tanh⁡x=sinh⁡x/cosh⁡x from The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains, where cosh⁡x>0 for every real x, and put λ±=eβJcosh⁡(βh)±e2βJsinh⁡2(βh)+e−2βJ. Then N−1log⁡ZNq→log⁡λ+, with every fixed finite order of derivatives converging locally uniformly on compact subsets of (0,∞)×R2. This is the exact commuting one-dimensional model, not a theorem for noncommuting interactions.

Global three-sector countermodel. For N≥1 and ϵ>0 joules, let KN=C⊕C⊕(C2)⊗2N with its orthogonal direct-sum inner product, and write I4N for the identity on the final 4N-dimensional summand. Let ∣A⟩,∣B⟩ be the standard unit vectors in the first and second summands, and let ∣s⟩ range over the standard product basis in the final summand. Define the finite matrix HNg=0⊕Nϵ⊕2NϵI4N on the full domain KN, so the basis energies are E(A)=0, E(B)=Nϵ, and E(s)=2Nϵ. For 0≤Δ<Nϵ, define the spectral-shell basis subset SN,Δ:={v:∣E(v)−Nϵ∣≤Δ} and its uniform state ρN,Δshell:=∣SN,Δ∣−1∑v∈SN,Δ∣v⟩⟨v∣. For β>0 this finite quantum model has ZNg=1+e−βNϵ+4Ne−2βNϵ. For every real β as an algebraic finite-weight extension, the normalized exponential-tilt weight of the one-dimensional middle sector is at most (2N+1+1)−1; the shell state above assigns that sector probability 1. The term “probability” here is the trace of the state against the middle-sector projection ∣B⟩⟨B∣. Also 1Nlog⁡ZNg⟶max⁡{0,log⁡4−2βϵ},0≤1Nlog⁡ZNg−max⁡{0,log⁡4−2βϵ}≤log⁡3N. The limiting function has a corner at βc=(log⁡2)/ϵ>0 J−1. For β>0, define the canonical mean energy per member of the global model by

EˉN(β):=Nϵe−βNϵ+2Nϵ 4Ne−2βNϵNZNg(β).

The limit u(β):=lim⁡N→∞EˉN(β) exists for all β>0 and equals 2ϵ for 0<β<βc, ϵ at β=βc, and 0 for β>βc. Thus the one-sided limits of the thermodynamic-limit mean energy are 2ϵ as β↑βc through positive values and 0 as β↓βc from above. The finite partition expressions are real analytic as functions of β∈R for fixed remaining model parameters; this is a regularity statement about the finite formulas, while the canonical preparation and mean-energy claims use only β>0. This global, size-dependent family is not a product of one fixed finite one-site alphabet and makes no claim about local or short-range matter.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite Hilbert spaces, Hamiltonians, indexed-bond convention, and positive-temperature canonical preparations in the Statement. Energies and ϵ are in joules; β is in J−1.

[A1]

Quantum statistics and model equilibrium preparation: use the normalized canonical Gibbs state only when its trace is positive and finite. For β≤0 in the three-sector bound, the finite exponential weights are only an algebraic extension, not a physical negative-temperature assumption.

[F1]

Pauli matrices and the two-qubit exchange operator: σz is Hermitian with eigenvectors e0,e1 and eigenvalues 1,−1.

[F2]

One-dimensional periodic Ising-chain limit: for the stated periodic two-state chain, with cosh⁡x=(ex+e−x)/2 and sinh⁡x=(ex−e−x)/2, the transfer matrix has eigenvalues λ± with λ+>∣λ−∣, and N−1log⁡ZN→log⁡λ+ with every fixed finite order of derivatives locally uniformly on compact parameter sets.

[F3]

Finite periodic Ising-ring correlations and exact decay (current draft Statement): for the finite periodic ring with N≥2, J≥0, β>0, and h=0, the one-site means and two-site correlations have the explicit finite-ring formulas stated there.

[F4]

Explicit nonadditive transition and ensemble inequivalence (current draft Statement and complete Proof): for the specified three-sector model, the canonical mean-energy limit is 2ϵ for 0<β<βc, ϵ at βc, and 0 for β>βc, where βc=(log⁡2)/ϵ>0; its finite partition, middle-sector bound, shell comparison, and limiting log partition are also as stated there. The canonical mean claim is restricted to positive β.

[F5]

The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains: sinh⁡x=(ex−e−x)/2, cosh⁡x=(ex+e−x)/2, tanh⁡x=sinh⁡x/cosh⁡x, and cosh⁡x>0 for every x∈R.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F6algebra

Each Zi is diagonal in the orthonormal product basis ∣s1,…,sN⟩, with eigenvalue si. Therefore HNq∣s⟩=HNcl(s)∣s⟩ with real eigenvalues. This diagonal representation proves self-adjointness on the full domain D(HNq)=HN. The finite canonical trace is the sum of these positive weights by [F6], so ZNq=∑se−βHNcl(s) and the diagonal Gibbs probability of each ∣s⟩ equals the classical probability of s. This proves the claimed finite correspondence without interpreting off-diagonal quantum observables classically.

1.2givenA1F4F6algebra

The direct sum in the second model has multiplicities 1,1,4N, so summing its three energy weights gives ZNg=1+x+4Nx2 where x=e−βNϵ>0. Its real diagonal entries show that HNg is self-adjoint on the stated full domain. Since (1−2Nx)2≥0, 1+4Nx2≥2N+1x, whence the middle-sector probability x/ZNg≤(2N+1+1)−1. For 0≤Δ<Nϵ, the sectors at energies 0 and 2Nϵ lie exactly Nϵ from the middle energy; the only basis vector in the shell is ∣B⟩, so ρN,Δshell=∣B⟩⟨B∣ and tr⁡(ρN,Δshell∣B⟩⟨B∣)=1. Identifying the three CSM sectors with ∣A⟩, ∣B⟩, and the final product-basis vectors preserves each energy and multiplicity; for every β>0 it therefore preserves the canonical sector weights and mean energy per member. [F4] These are the same finite-model values, now realized on the displayed quantum Hilbert space.

2.1givenF2F3F5step 1.1

The definitions in [F5] agree with the exponential definitions of sinh⁡ and cosh⁡ in [F2] and of tanh⁡ in [F3]; in particular cosh⁡(βJ)>0, so the zero-field correlation parameter tanh⁡(βJ) is defined. Applying [F2] to this identical finite energy function gives the displayed transfer eigenvalues, limiting normalized log partition, and compact-uniform derivative convergence. In the restricted case J≥0,h=0, the equality of diagonal probabilities from step 1.1 transports each σz correlation to the classical spin correlation in [F3], under exactly that supplier's hypotheses.

2.2givenA1F4F6step 1.2algebra

Put MN=max⁡{1,4Nx2}. If x≤1, then x≤MN; if x>1, then 4Nx2≥x for N≥1. Hence MN≤ZNg≤3MN. By the logarithm product law in [F6], N−1log⁡MN=max⁡{0,log⁡4−2βϵ}, so taking logarithms gives the stated error bound and limit. Since log⁡4=2log⁡2, the two branches meet at βc=(log⁡2)/ϵ. By [F4] and the exact finite-weight identification in step 1.2, the limits of the quantum mean energy per member are 2ϵ for 0<β<βc, ϵ at βc, and 0 for β>βc. These are canonical mean-energy claims only for β>0, as required by [A1].

3.1givenF2F6F7algebra∎

Fix N and the other model parameters. The Ising partition function is the finite sum ∑s∈{−1,1}Nexp⁡(−βHNcl(s)), and the global partition function is the finite sum of its three sector weights. Each energy in these sums is fixed as a function of β, so the map β↦−βE is affine and real analytic. The exponential is a power-series sum and therefore real analytic by [F6]–[F7]; composing with the affine maps and taking finite sums preserves real analyticity by [F7]. Thus each fixed-parameter finite-N partition function is real analytic on R, in particular at every positive canonical parameter. The Ising limit is asserted here only with the derivative convergence supplied by [F2].

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Exact onsite Bose and Fermi interacting atoms

Physical scope

One isolated single-mode repulsive Bose site and one isolated two-spin-mode Fermi Hubbard atom in finite-temperature grand-canonical model states. The Bose interaction U is strictly positive; the Fermi interaction is nonnegative. No hopping, lattice thermodynamic limit, material-specific prediction, or empirical observation is asserted.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) for the occupation-space and diagonal-domain supplier uses below.

Repulsive single-mode Bose site. Let HB=ℓ2(N0) with orthonormal occupation basis ∣n⟩, supplied by the one-mode specialization of Occupation bases and actual CCR/CAR domains. Put EB(n):=ϵn+U2n(n−1), where ϵ,μ∈R and U>0 are in joules. Define HB and NB as real diagonal multipliers HB∣n⟩=EB(n)∣n⟩ and NB∣n⟩=n∣n⟩ on their maximal domains D(HB)={c∈ℓ2:∑n≥0EB(n)2∣cn∣2<∞},D(NB)={c∈ℓ2:∑n≥0n2∣cn∣2<∞}. For β>0 in J−1, define KB directly as the real diagonal multiplier with eigenvalues KB(n):=EB(n)−μn=U2n2+(ϵ−μ−U2)n on the exact maximal domain D(KB)={c∈ℓ2:∑n≥0KB(n)2∣cn∣2<∞}. These diagonal multipliers are self-adjoint on their displayed domains. The grand partition sum ΞB(β,μ)=∑n=0∞e−βKB(n) is finite and positive for every such (β,μ). It is jointly real analytic locally on (0,∞)×R, meaning it has an absolutely convergent power-series representation in the two real parameters near every point. Its normalized diagonal Gibbs state has weights pn=ΞB−1e−βKB(n) and ⟨NB⟩=ΞB−1∑n≥0ne−βKB(n),∂μ⟨NB⟩=β Var⁡(NB). In the zero-temperature limit β→∞, the unique minimizing occupation is 0 when μ<ϵ, and is r≥1 when ϵ+U(r−1)<μ<ϵ+Ur. At each boundary μ=ϵ+Ur for r∈N0, exactly the adjacent occupations r,r+1 minimize KB; their probabilities tend to 1/2 each and the model entropy S=−kBtr⁡(ρBlog⁡ρB) from Quantum statistics and model equilibrium preparation tends to kBlog⁡2. In a strict interval, the unique minimizing number state has probability tending to one and entropy tending to zero.

Two-mode Fermi Hubbard atom. On HF=C4 with orthonormal occupation basis ∣n↑,n↓⟩, n↑,n↓∈{0,1}, define n↑∣n↑,n↓⟩=n↑∣n↑,n↓⟩ and n↓∣n↑,n↓⟩=n↓∣n↑,n↓⟩, and adopt HF=ϵ(n↑+n↓)+Un↑n↓−h(n↑−n↓), where ϵ,μ,U,h are in joules, U≥0, and β>0. With KF=HF−μ(n↑+n↓), its grand partition function and weights are ΞF=1+w↑+w↓+w2,w↑=e−β(ϵ−μ−h),w↓=e−β(ϵ−μ+h),w2=e−β(2(ϵ−μ)+U). Thus ⟨n↑+n↓⟩=(w↑+w↓+2w2)/ΞF, the double-occupation probability ⟨n↑n↓⟩ is w2/ΞF, and, with Cov⁡(n↑,n↓):=⟨n↑n↓⟩−⟨n↑⟩⟨n↓⟩, Cov⁡(n↑,n↓)=e−2β(ϵ−μ)(e−βU−1)ΞF2≤0. The covariance is zero at U=0 and strictly negative at U>0. These are exact conditional model calculations, not claims about measured atoms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the Hilbert spaces, occupation bases, Hamiltonians, and parameter restrictions in the Statement. Occupation numbers are dimensionless, kB>0 is in J K−1, and the entropy has units J K−1.

[A1]

Quantum statistics and model equilibrium preparation: Bose or Fermi sector assignment is a separate physical assumption; the normalized grand Gibbs state is adopted only when its trace is finite and positive.

[A2]

Use counting measure on N0 for the Bose sums and counting measure on the four occupation states for the finite Fermi sums.

[A3]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. This is the exact mathematical premise retained from the occupation-space and real diagonal-domain suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed.

[F1]

Occupation bases and actual CCR/CAR domains: for a one-element mode set, the bosonic finite-support configuration set is N0 and its occupation vectors form a complete orthonormal basis; the fermionic two-mode occupation configurations form the four-dimensional basis used here.

[F2]

Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace: under ACω, real diagonal multipliers H,N,Kμ are self-adjoint on their exact maximal domains ∑mE(m)2∣cm∣2<∞, ∑m∣m∣2∣cm∣2<∞, and ∑m∣E(m)−μ∣m∣∣2∣cm∣2<∞, respectively; the product trace formula there applies only to additive free-mode energies and is not used for the nonlinear Bose term.

[F3]

Quantum statistics and model equilibrium preparation: when the actual trace is positive and finite, the adopted grand state is ρ=Ξ−1e−β(H−μN) and the model entropy is S=−kBtr⁡(ρlog⁡ρ) where defined.

[F4]

Real analytic germs in several variables: a real analytic germ at a point of R2 is represented on a polydisc by an absolutely convergent real power series in the two coordinate differences.

[F7]

An absolutely convergent multi-indexed power series is holomorphic and differentiates termwise and Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum: a multi-indexed power series with coefficients bounded by Mr1−pr2−q is absolutely convergent on every smaller polydisc, and absolute convergence permits rearrangement without changing its sum.

[F8]

Grand-response derivatives are covariances: for a measurable exponential family with a compact-parameter integrable envelope dominating the weight times 1+∣X∣2, the derivative of E(X) with respect to its natural parameter is Var⁡(X)=E[(X−EX)2].

[F9]

The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞: for fixed a>0, xme−ax→0 as x→+∞ for every fixed natural m.

[F11]

Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs: the inner-product pairing on ℓ2(N0) satisfies ∣⟨c,d⟩∣≤∥c∥ ∥d∥.

Proof

1.1givenA3F1F2F11algebra

The one-mode case of [F1] identifies the number basis with the standard basis of ℓ2(N0), whose finite-support span is dense. For any real diagonal multiplier with entries λn, testing the adjoint identity on each basis vector forces the adjoint image to have coordinates λncn, so its adjoint domain is contained in {c:∑nλn2∣cn∣2<∞}. Conversely, on that weighted domain [F11] makes the pairing bounded and identifies the adjoint action with the same multiplier. Thus its maximal diagonal domain is self-adjoint. Applying this calculation to EB(n), n, and KB(n) establishes the three domains in the Statement.

1.2givenF1algebra

Consecutive Bose grand energies on the number basis [F1] satisfy KB(n+1)−KB(n)=ϵ−μ+Un, a strictly increasing affine sequence in n. It is positive at every n≥0 when μ<ϵ, so 0 uniquely minimizes. For r≥1, it is negative through n=r−1 and positive from n=r exactly when ϵ+U(r−1)<μ<ϵ+Ur, so r uniquely minimizes. At μ=ϵ+Ur, the increment at n=r is zero while all earlier increments are negative and all later increments positive; exactly r,r+1 minimize.

1.3givenA1F1F3algebra

The four Fermi basis states have grand energies 0, ϵ−μ−h, ϵ−μ+h, and 2(ϵ−μ)+U, respectively. Summing their four positive weights gives the displayed ΞF, and summing n↑+n↓ or n↑n↓ against those weights gives the stated mean and double-occupation probability. The state is well-defined because this is a finite positive sum, as required by [A1] and [F3].

2.1givenA1A3F2step 1.1algebra

For fixed real a and n≥0, completing the square gives ∣a∣n≤Un2/4+a2/U. Hence, for Pa(n)=Un2/2+an, Un2/4≤∣Pa(n)∣+a2/U, so n2≤(4/U)∣Pa(n)∣+4a2/U2. Fix an energy reference Eref>0 in joules. Since ∣Pa(n)∣≤Eref+Pa(n)2/Eref, this bound shows that the maximal diagonal domain associated with either quadratic sequence EB(n) or KB(n) is contained in D(NB). On D(HB), KBc=HBc−μNBc is square-summable, so D(HB)⊆D(KB); on D(KB), HBc=KBc+μNBc is square-summable, so D(KB)⊆D(HB). Thus D(HB)=D(KB)⊆D(NB), and the operator sum HB−μNB, whose domain is D(HB)∩D(NB), equals KB on its maximal domain.

2.2givenF3step 1.2F5F6algebra

In a strict interval with unique minimizer r, let δ be the smaller positive adjacent energy gap from r (use only the upward gap when r=0). For n>r, the gap is a sum of increments from step 1.2, each at least the upward gap at r; for n<r, it is a sum of reversed increments, each at least the downward gap from r−1. Hence KB(n)−KB(r)≥δ∣n−r∣. The total relative excited weight is therefore at most 2∑ℓ≥1e−βδℓ=2e−βδ/(1−e−βδ), which tends to zero. At a boundary μ=ϵ+Ur, the increments are KB(n+1)−KB(n)=U(n−r), so exactly r,r+1 minimize. To the right, KB(r+1+ℓ)−KB(r+1)=U(1+⋯+ℓ)≥Uℓ; to the left, KB(r−ℓ)−KB(r)=U(1+⋯+ℓ)≥Uℓ whenever r≥ℓ. Thus the total relative excited weight is at most 2∑ℓ≥1e−βUℓ=2e−βU/(1−e−βU). The normalized Gibbs probabilities from [F3] therefore concentrate on the unique number state in a strict interval, or tend to 1/2,1/2 on the adjacent pair at a boundary.

3.1givenA1A3F2F3F5F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Put a=ϵ−μ−U/2. Completing the square gives KB(n)=U4n2+U4(n+2a/U)2−a2/U≥U4n2−a2/U. For n≥1, n2≥n, so e−βKB(n)≤eβa2/Uqn with q=e−βU/4. Since βU/4>0, [F5] gives 0<q<1, and [F6] makes the geometric upper bound summable. The n=0 term is 1, so 0<ΞB<∞ and [A1], [F3] give a well-defined normalized grand state for the exact operator HB−μNB=KB from step 2.1. The free-mode product trace formula in [F2] is not used.

3.2givenF3F5F6F9F10step 2.2algebra

Let g=1 in a strict interval and g=2 at a boundary, and shift all energies by their minimum so the ground energy is zero. The diagonal entropy from [F3] is SB/kB=log⁡Dβ+β∑n≥0pnKB(n), where Dβ=g+Rβ and Rβ is the total relative excited weight from step 2.2. Thus Dβ→g by step 2.2 and log⁡Dβ→log⁡g by continuity [F10]. In either case, for each distance ℓ≥1 there are at most two excited states; their lower gaps are δℓ by step 2.2 and their upper gaps are C(1+ℓ2) because KB(n) is quadratic in n. Here C>0 is a fixed energy in joules and δ=U at a boundary. Fix β0>0 in inverse joules. For β≥β0, [F9] makes (1+ℓ2)e−β0δℓ/2 bounded; splitting e−βδℓ=e−βδℓ/2e−βδℓ/2 therefore bounds β∑ℓ≥1(1+ℓ2)e−βδℓ by a constant times β∑ℓ≥1e−βδℓ/2=βqβ/(1−qβ), where qβ=e−βδ/2. This tends to zero by [F5], [F6], and [F9]. Consequently the excited contribution to the entropy vanishes, while the normalized ground weights contribute 0 for g=1 and log⁡2 for g=2.

4.1givenF4F5F7step 3.1algebra

Fix (β0,μ0) with β0>0, put u=β−β0, v=μ−μ0, a0=ϵ−μ0−U/2, and Kn0=Un2/2+a0n. Then −βKB(n;μ)=−β0Kn0−uKn0+β0vn+uvn, so [F5] expands each summand as e−β0Kn0e−uKn0eβ0vneuvn. On radii rβ=β0/2 and any fixed rμ>0, the sum of the absolute values of all terms of these three exponential power series, over all n, is bounded by ∑n≥0exp⁡(−β0Kn0+rβ∣Kn0∣+β0rμn+rβrμn). For all sufficiently large n, Kn0≥0 and ∣Kn0∣≤Un2/2+∣a0∣n, so the exponent is at most −β0Un2/4+Cn for a finite constant C. Increasing the cutoff so Cn≤β0Un2/8 leaves a tail bounded by e−β0Un/8, whose series converges by [F5]–[F6]; the finitely many initial terms are finite. Thus the total absolute coefficient sum is finite. Grouping r+t=p and s+t=q gives cpq=∑n≥0e−β0Kn0∑t=0min⁡(p,q)(−Kn0)p−t(β0n)q−tnt(p−t)!(q−t)!t!. The absolute bound and [F7] justify these coefficient sums and rearrangement, and give ∑p,q∣cpq∣rβprμq<∞, hence ∣cpq∣≤Mrβ−prμ−q for some finite M. Applying the multivariable power-series theorem [F7] gives a holomorphic sum on the complex polydisc; its real restriction is the absolutely convergent germ in [F4]. Since (β0,μ0) was arbitrary, ΞB is jointly real analytic on (0,∞)×R.

4.2givenA2F3F5F6F8F9F12step 3.1algebra

Fix β>0 and let μ range over a compact interval. The quantity a=ϵ−μ−U/2 is then bounded, so the square bound in step 3.1 gives e−βKB(n;μ)≤Ce−βUn2/4 for a constant C uniform on that interval. Put q=e−βU/8∈(0,1). Since n2≥n, (1+n2)e−βKB(n;μ)≤C(1+n2)q2n. By [F9], (1+n2)qn is bounded, so the right side is at most C′qn, a summable geometric envelope. Apply [F8] on N0 with the counting measure [A2], weight w(n)=e−βEB(n), observable X(n)=n, and natural parameter θ=βμ. Its hypotheses hold by this compact envelope and step 3.1; it gives ∂θE(NB)=Var⁡(NB). The chain rule [F12] yields the displayed response, while the normalized weights give the expectation formula.

5.1givenstep 1.3algebra∎

The normalized means are ⟨n↑⟩=(w↑+w2)/ΞF and ⟨n↓⟩=(w↓+w2)/ΞF, while ⟨n↑n↓⟩=w2/ΞF. Subtracting the product of the means yields Cov⁡(n↑,n↓)=(w2−w↑w↓)/ΞF2. Since w↑w↓=e−2β(ϵ−μ) and w2=e−2β(ϵ−μ)e−βU, this is the displayed formula; U≥0 makes it nonpositive, with equality exactly at U=0.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources