How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gaussian and gamma product tools
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Classical configuration, phase and reference spaces
- Cm Math Canonical
- Cm Math Continuum
- Cm Math Geometry
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Connections And Free Fall
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Ensembles And Limits
- Equivalent Forms of Completeness
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework And Geometry
- Framework, quantities and geometry
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Observer Measurements
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Particle spacetime, observers and worldlines
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symplectic Manifolds, Moser Stability, and Darboux–Weinstein Theory
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- Tensors And Observers
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
This page supplies finite Gaussian and gamma product identities, a Gaussian covariance calculation under the stated Countable Choice measure hypothesis, the normalized marginal of a specified spherical-shell preparation under Countable Choice, and fine-entropy conservation under supplied smooth volume-preserving flow data. Physical results then calculate canonical and grand-canonical ideal gases, a finite Ising ring, a one-dimensional hard-rod gas, and a finite spherical-shell gas. Each physical conclusion is conditional on its explicitly adopted preparation, reference measure, units and finite-domain assumptions; the continuous Lebesgue product and Jordan-volume calculations state their Countable Choice conditions. No experiment, equilibration mechanism, or general ensemble-equivalence claim is asserted. Moment differentiation follows the explicitly evaluated moments and Gamma recurrence; finite-ring transfer identities use the published periodic Ising-chain theorem. The continuous models share the explicitly adopted positive action reference, with their original label-counting conventions retained. Draft status and the ordinary independent review obligations remain.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals
Statement
For and an integer , define as the two-sided improper Riemann integral. Then
where for . In particular, and . For every compact interval , is continuously differentiable on and
For , put . Then is finite and
Consequently, if independent positive random variables have densities and , their sum has density .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , an integer , and positive real parameters .
The improper integral of over is finite and positive: the improper Gaussian integral is finite and positive.
The square of the one-dimensional Gaussian integral is the plane Gaussian integral: the square of the one-dimensional Gaussian integral equals the nonnegative plane Gaussian integral.
The plane Gaussian integral equals by polar coordinates: the nonnegative plane Gaussian integral equals , with the polar substitutions justified on compact half-annuli away from the origin.
Change of variables for an injective map on a compact Jordan set: an injective map with invertible derivative on an open neighborhood of a compact Jordan set transforms a bounded integrable function by the absolute Jacobian determinant.
Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers: for any fixed real exponent , the positive-base power is differentiable on , with derivative ; these positive-base powers are continuous.
Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system: two measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal if that system contains an increasing common finite-measure exhaustion of the whole space.
Proof
For , the gamma integrand on is bounded by , whose integral is . For , is bounded, so and the tail converges. On a compact positive -interval, the lower endpoint bounds the near-zero power and the upper endpoint bounds the exponential tail uniformly. Hence is finite and has controlled endpoint tails.
Let . By [F2], equals the nonnegative plane Gaussian integral, and [F3] evaluates that integral as . Hence .
By [F1], is finite and positive. The positive square root in step 1.2 is therefore .
Integration by parts on gives . The boundary terms vanish by step 1.1, so ; direct integration gives .
For , the beta integrand is integrable near by comparison with and near by comparison with . On each compact rectangle the continuous product integrand has integral equal to the product of its one-dimensional integrals, as follows by factoring the finite rectangular Riemann sums. These nested rectangles exhaust the positive quadrant and their integrals tend to by step 1.1.
Substitution on compact half-intervals and passage to the convergent improper limits gives by steps 1.2 and 2.1.
On in coordinates , the map is injective, has determinant , and is a diffeomorphism on an open neighborhood. Its image is a compact Jordan set. The images exhaust the positive quadrant cofinally with the rectangles in step 2.3: each compact rectangle stays a positive distance from both axes and has bounded , while each image is compact and stays away from the axes. Applying [F4] on and taking the increasing limits gives . The limits are finite by step 1.1 and the endpoint bounds in step 2.3.
For integer , is bounded on , so and [F1] gives absolute convergence; odd moments converge absolutely and vanish by reflection. On compact intervals the substitution is covered by [F4], and its improper limit gives by steps 1.2 and 2.1. The substitution on both half-lines gives ; finiteness follows from step 1.1, the half-integer starting value from step 3.1, and recurrence from step 2.2.
Let and set . The event is Jordan measurable. On each grid rectangle , independence gives probability ; because the marginal densities are continuous on , the finite rectangular Riemann sums factor and converge to the integral of on that rectangle. The inner and outer grid unions for differ only in cells meeting its finitely many line-segment boundary pieces; their total area tends to zero, and is bounded on . Thus . As increases to the positive quadrant, countable additivity gives probabilities increasing to , and the nonnegative improper integrals increase to the integral over . The images of under increase to . On each such compact set the map is injective with absolute Jacobian , so [F4] transforms the integral to . Its rectangular Riemann sums factor; as the -integral tends to . By step 3.2, . A singleton C has probability zero by the same zero-area grid-boundary argument. The density integrates to one by step 1.1.
Fix the integer . Step 4.1 evaluated for every using only convergent improper substitutions, and step 2.2 proved the Gamma recurrence by integration by parts; neither argument used parameter differentiation. By [F5], differentiation of this established explicit function gives The same positive-base power formula makes this derivative continuous on , hence on a neighborhood of every compact . This proves the full parameter clause without interchanging a derivative and an improper integral.
Let be the law of on and let be the probability measure with the density in step 4.2. The collection is closed under intersections, allowing a singleton or the empty set. It generates the Borel sigma-algebra of the positive half-line: its members are closed there, and every relatively open interval is a countable union of closed subintervals with positive endpoints; unbounded intervals are obtained by an additional increasing union. Step 4.2 gives equality of and on every member of , including the singleton case. The sets for integers increase to , lie in , and have common measure at most . Thus [F6] proves on all Borel sets, which establishes the claimed gamma convolution law.
Remarks
The parameter-derivative clause follows from the independently evaluated moments and Gamma recurrence. No research-module token is used as a logical supplier, and these integral identities make no empirical claim. No claim is made for , or .
Jacobian identity for a specified smooth diffeomorphic flow
Statement
Let , let be an open interval containing , and let be open. Suppose is jointly , each is a diffeomorphism from onto an open set , and . Let be open and let be with . Define , , and . Then
In particular for all , and if on , then . The same identities hold on the flat torus , where for a linearly independent basis and the smooth structure and Euclidean metric descend from . In that clause, let be jointly , with each a diffeomorphism and . Let be the tangent-bundle projection, and let have chart coefficients and satisfy and . In every translation chart write and define . Define to be the matrix of in the translation frames and . Translation-chart changes have derivative , so these matrices, determinants and divergences agree on overlaps. These are identities for supplied flow data; no existence or global-flow theorem is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The interval , open set , jointly family , diffeomorphism and initial-identity hypotheses, and velocity field in the Statement.
Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives: the two mixed second partial derivatives of a scalar function on an open Euclidean set agree.
The chain rule for total derivatives: : for totally differentiable maps, the derivative of a composite is the composite of the derivatives.
The derivative of the determinant along an invertible C¹ matrix curve: : if is a differentiable invertible real square-matrix curve, then .
For and , : for matching finite real square matrices, .
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with : a function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on its interior has an interior point where its derivative equals the interval's average slope.
Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and : a continuous real function on a closed interval takes every value between its endpoint values.
Proof
For each component , joint regularity and [F1] give . Differentiating the given velocity equation in and applying [F2] yields , where .
Each is invertible: differentiating by [F2] gives . Thus [F3] applies to the matrix curve and gives .
By [F4], . Also , so .
The determinant is continuous and nonzero on by step 2.1. If it were negative for some , [F6] on the closed segment with endpoints and would give a point where , contradicting invertibility. Hence .
If , step 3.1 gives . For each fixed , the case is already . For , apply [F5] to on , whose endpoints are distinct; since its derivative is zero, its endpoint difference is zero, so .
For the torus clause, fix and . By continuity, choose a time neighborhood of on which and stay in translation charts. Their transition maps are translations, so the coordinate matrices of , their determinants, and the coordinate divergence of agree on overlaps. In these charts the Euclidean calculations in steps 1.1–3.1 prove both differential identities, and gives . Since was arbitrary, the identities hold throughout ; applying steps 4.1 and 4.2 on the closed segment between and any gives positivity and the divergence-free conclusion.
Remarks
The hypotheses describe an already supplied family of diffeomorphisms and its velocity field. This lemma does not prove that an ODE generates such a family, that a trajectory is global, or that any physical fluid or Hamiltonian model satisfies the hypotheses.
Fine entropy under a specified incompressible periodic flow
Statement
Use for the natural logarithm of The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function. Let be a flat translation torus, where for a linearly independent basis , with the smooth structure and Euclidean metric descended from . Let be its fixed translation-invariant volume measure in dimensionless translation coordinates, with . Let be an open interval containing . Suppose is jointly , each is a diffeomorphism, and . Let be the tangent-bundle projection and let have chart coefficients with and . In translation charts write and define . Assume in these charts. Let satisfy and , and define . Then is a probability density for every , the integral is finite, and . Here is the dimensionless fine entropy of this density; multiplication by a physical constant such as is a separate interpretation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The flat torus, fixed measure , jointly diffeomorphisms , divergence-free velocity, and positive probability density bounded above and below as in the Statement.
Jacobian identity for a specified smooth diffeomorphic flow: on the flat translation torus, for a jointly diffeomorphic family with and a time-dependent vector field satisfying , the local-chart Jacobian satisfies , is positive, and equals when the chart divergence vanishes.
Change of variables for an injective map on a compact Jordan set: an injective map with invertible derivative on an open neighborhood of a compact Jordan set obeys the Riemann change-of-variables formula for bounded integrable functions.
The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function defines on as the inverse of the real exponential; Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm makes it continuous there. In particular it is bounded and continuous on every compact interval .
Proof
Apply [F1] to the given family. Its hypotheses are exactly the supplied diffeomorphisms, identity initial map and divergence-free velocity, so every local translation-chart Jacobian is .
For fixed , around each point choose a source chart and a smaller coordinate neighborhood whose closure maps under into a target chart. Continuity and compactness give finitely many closed coordinate boxes with interiors covering the torus and with each inside a target chart. Put and ; each is compact, the pieces cover the torus, and any overlap lies on one of the box faces. Each is Jordan because its boundary lies in a finite union of coordinate faces, which are compact hypersurface patches. A graph patch has bounded slope on a compact subpatch, so its mesh- box cover has total -volume and hence content zero. On compact chart neighborhoods has bounded derivative, so it maps these zero-content boundaries to zero-content boundaries. Each compact piece and its image therefore have Jordan boundaries and lie in source and target charts; [F2] applies there. Summing over the pieces, overlaps do not affect the integrals, translation chart changes preserve , and the constant is the same on both sides. Thus for every continuous on the torus, .
The function is positive and continuous. The substitution of step 2.1 with gives , so is normalized.
The bounds also hold for ; by [F3], is continuous on , so is bounded and continuous on the compact torus and its integral is finite. Applying step 2.1 to gives , since . Negating proves .
Remarks
This is a statement about supplied smooth mathematical flow data. It does not assert existence of a flow for a vector field, Hamiltonian structure, relaxation, mixing, ergodicity, monotonicity of coarse entropy, or a physical entropy interpretation.
Gaussian covariance for positive quadratic forms and a boundary counterexample
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (). Let , let be symmetric positive definite, and let . For put , and use the Euclidean Lebesgue measure to define the density . Then
Positive definiteness and are essential for this normalized full-space Gaussian. The unrestricted identity is false without a boundary hypothesis: on with and , the normalized expectation on the left is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , symmetric positive-definite , , and on .
Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals: for , , odd Gaussian moments vanish, and the second moment is .
Under , a diffeomorphism transforms nonnegative Lebesgue integrals by its absolute Jacobian (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).
Under , Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the finite product of one-dimensional Lebesgue measures on Borel rectangles, and each box has measure equal to the product of its side lengths (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included); each factor is sigma-finite. Tonelli factors nonnegative products, and Fubini factors absolutely integrable signed products (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
The Gaussian integrals and moments in [F1] are improper Riemann integrals. On bounded intervals they agree with Lebesgue integrals under , and monotone convergence passes their nonnegative truncations to (Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands, Monotone convergence for the integral).
Proof
We construct with by induction on . For , take . For , write ; positive definiteness gives and positive definite, since for . By induction ; then satisfies . Its diagonal entries are positive, so ; taking determinants gives and therefore .
Put . This is a diffeomorphism of with . Since , [F2] gives By [F3], is the finite product of sigma-finite one-dimensional Lebesgue measures; Tonelli and the factorization give the integral as . By [F1] and [F4], . Hence which is finite and positive.
Let have the normalized density proportional to with respect to . For each , [F3] and Tonelli factor the nonnegative second-moment integral into , while the normalizer is ; [F1] gives . Also , since and the same Tonelli factorization makes both integrals finite. For , , so the cross moments are absolutely integrable. Fubini [F3] factors these signed moments; the one-dimensional first and odd moments vanish by [F1]. Thus and .
By [F2], the normalized law of is the pullback of the law of under . The absolute integrability established in step 3.1 permits the same change of variables for signed first and second moments by applying [F2] to their positive and negative parts. Hence and Since , summing the diagonal second moments gives .
For the stated boundary counterexample, the density on is the constant because and the normalizing integral is by [F3]. Since everywhere, for .
Remarks
If has a nonzero kernel, the integrand is constant along an unbounded kernel direction and ; if , the full-space integral also diverges. The theorem does not assert a named-degree-of-freedom equipartition rule on arbitrary domains or for discrete variables.
Exact spherical-shell coordinate marginal and fixed-block Gaussian limit
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (). Let , , and . Let be independent real random variables with common Lebesgue probability density ; its integral is one by the Gaussian integral in Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals, and this is the standard-normal coordinate law. Set and define when , and when . The joint density of makes . The distribution of is rotationally invariant, meaning that for every orthogonal map and Borel set , . It is concentrated on the sphere in the precise sense that . Its first coordinates have Lebesgue density
and zero for . This density is integrable even when it diverges at the boundary. Also , for , and .
For fixed and , set and let through integers . If is bounded and Lipschitz in the Euclidean norm, meaning that finite constants satisfy and for all , then
This is a fixed-block bounded-Lipschitz test limit; it makes no claim uniform in or for unbounded test functions. If , the projection is singular on the sphere and the displayed Lebesgue density is not asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice , integers with and , radius , and the product probability law of independent coordinates with density .
Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals: is finite for , , positive gamma densities with the same scale convolve by adding their shape parameters, and the Gaussian second and fourth moments are and for a standard normal coordinate.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: assuming , for a diffeomorphism between open subsets of Euclidean space and nonnegative Lebesgue-measurable on , the Lebesgue integral transforms by .
On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}: assuming , product Lebesgue measure and Euclidean Lebesgue measure agree on Borel subsets of for positive integers .
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: for a nonnegative product-measurable function on a product of sigma-finite measure spaces, either order of integration agrees with the product integral.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): says every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function; it is the explicit set-theoretic hypothesis used by [F2].
Proof
Under Countable Choice [F5], the Borel product-measure identity [F3] and independence give the joint Lebesgue density . A singleton has Lebesgue measure zero, so almost surely. For any orthogonal and Borel , the map is a diffeomorphism with ; applying [F2] to and using gives . Since off the null event, the law of is invariant under every orthogonal map, and almost surely.
Write with and . The vectors are independent. On each open half-line and , the map is a diffeomorphism onto ; applying [F2] to the Gaussian density times the indicator of any Borel target set on each branch shows that each has density . Repeated gamma convolution from [F1] then shows has density for , where , independently of .
For fixed , the first coordinates range over . The inverse is . Its derivative has radial eigenvalue and tangential eigenvalues , hence Jacobian .
The map from to is a diffeomorphism, with inverse . Apply [F2] to the nonnegative joint density of and this diffeomorphism. The product Lebesgue measure on agrees with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel sets by [F3], and Tonelli's theorem [F4] gives the marginal density by integration in . Substituting the Gaussian density of , the gamma density of , and the Jacobian from step 1.3 yields . The substitution evaluates the integral as . Since , simplification gives the displayed density. Its boundary singularity, when present, has exponent and is integrable in the radial variable; the pushforward construction shows total mass one. Because almost surely, the marginal has no boundary atom at .
Sign changes of one Gaussian coordinate show and for . Permutation invariance makes all equal, while almost surely; summing expectations gives .
For each finite , take the product Gaussian vector in that dimension and set . By [F1] and independence, , , and . Fix and . On , and the identity gives ; hence . If is bounded Lipschitz with bound and Lipschitz constant , then and imply . Therefore . Choose large, then small, then large. The right side becomes arbitrarily small, proving the stated test convergence without assuming independence between and .
Remarks
This is a specified rotational Gaussian-direction preparation. It is not a general coarea formula, a proof that every energy-shell measure has this marginal, or a dynamical equilibration result.
Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation
Separate finite classical canonical, grand-canonical, spherical-shell and product preparations in the named model examples; no claim of equilibration, empirical truth, or statistical inference from observations.
Postulate
Here denotes the natural logarithm defined in The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function.
For each named finite classical model in this page, adopt the preparation explicitly stated in its theorem. In a canonical branch, take a measurable phase space with a specified reference measure , a measurable Hamiltonian , an inverse energy parameter , and a finite positive partition function ; the adopted probability measure is . In a grand-canonical branch, take disjoint particle-number sectors with sector partition functions and a dimensionless activity for which is finite; sector has probability weight . The spherical-shell and product preparations are separate explicitly specified probability laws in their consuming theorem statements. These are alternative model assumptions, not consequences of a Hamiltonian flow and not assertions that a laboratory system realizes them.
For a canonical model whose reference measure and Hamiltonian are fixed, adopt the statistical thermodynamic definitions , , and when the displayed integrals are finite. For a volume-dependent model, define the model pressure as only along the declared fixed-shape volume family. Here has SI units J K, temperature has units K, and has units J. The fixed reference measure is part of the preparation; changing it changes the numerical partition function and entropy convention.
For the continuous particle examples, adopt the operational species and counting convention of Classical particle counting and physical observables. Use one fixed primitive action reference in J s, and write where the consuming model uses the notation . In a Cartesian physical phase chart has action dimension , so the reference is dimensionless. Each model retains its declared operational labels: an omitted factorial for resolved harmonic coordinates is not replaced by a particle-exchange quotient. The finite spin examples use their stated discrete counting measure, without a continuous phase-cell factor. Choosing a numerical reference action, or identifying it with Planck's constant, is an additional convention; no such value or identification is imposed here. The Gaussian and gamma identities in Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals establish the mathematical normalizations, not the physical preparation or empirical equilibration.
Remarks
A finite partition function and normalized density are mathematical conditions of each canonical consumer. No negative-temperature unbounded gas, ergodic hypothesis, observed outcome, or universal ensemble-selection principle is included.
Confined coupled quadratic canonical systems
Finite classical continuous canonical model with positive diagonal mass matrix, strictly positive stiffness matrix, fixed positive action reference and beta>0; the Lebesgue product calculations assume ACω; no unpinned zero mode or empirical equilibration claim.
Statement
Assume as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice () for the Euclidean Lebesgue product measure used below. Let , let with in kg, and let be a real symmetric positive-definite stiffness matrix with entries in J m. For displacement in metres and momentum in kg m s, define Adopt the canonical probability density proportional to relative to , where has units J and the fixed action reference has units J s. Under the preparation of Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation, the dimensionless partition function and moments are The model mean energy is . With in J K and in K from Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation, so that , define the fixed-parameter heat-capacity response by It has units J K. This model has no volume variable, so is not a fixed-volume derivative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , positive diagonal, symmetric positive definite, , fixed , and the displayed continuous-coordinate canonical model.
Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation: in each named model with finite positive , the canonical probability is relative to the specified reference; and the fixed-reference thermodynamic interpretation is adopted separately from the probability preparation.
Gaussian covariance for positive quadratic forms and a boundary counterexample: assuming , for a symmetric positive-definite quadratic form on , the normalized Gaussian integral is , with mean zero and covariance .
Under , Euclidean phase-space Lebesgue measure is the product of the and Lebesgue measures; Tonelli factors nonnegative densities and Fubini factors their integrable moments (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
The canonical density is a model preparation, not a claim that an isolated trajectory equilibrates or that a laboratory realizes this law.
Proof
By [F1], the phase-space weight factors as . The product-measure identity and Tonelli [F3] justify multiplying the two nonnegative Lebesgue integrals. Applying [F2] to the factor gives normalization and covariance .
The momentum quadratic form has symmetric positive-definite matrix . Applying [F2] with gives its integral and covariance of equal to .
Multiplying the two integrals from steps 1.1–1.2 and dividing by the reference factor gives . The phase-space Lebesgue measure is the product of its and factors by [F3]; the normalized canonical density therefore factors into independent and laws. Each factor is even, so its mean is zero, and its covariance is the one computed in steps 1.1–1.2.
By [F1], taking the expectation of and summing the diagonal traces of the two covariance identities gives The adopted relation makes . Holding the model parameters fixed therefore gives , with units J K.
Remarks
Positive definiteness is a confinement condition. If has a translation zero mode, the full-space configurational integral diverges and this normalized ensemble does not exist without an additional constraint or confinement.
Exact canonical and grand ideal-gas preparations
Finite-N canonical sectors of a classical ideal gas of one operationally indistinguishable species on a bounded rectangular box, their grand-canonical sum including N=0, and a separately adopted three-dimensional classical H=c|p| branch; the Lebesgue product and polar calculations assume ACω; excludes quantum statistics, actual equilibration, and identifying the massless branch with m->0.
Statement
Assume as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (), for the Euclidean Lebesgue product and polar-coordinate suppliers used below. Let be the real exponential of The real exponential function and the number by a power series, and let be the natural logarithm of The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, with for by The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t. Let and let , where each side length is in metres and is in . Let be the common particle mass in kg, in J, and let be the fixed action reference in J s from Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation. Take one species of operationally indistinguishable particles as in Classical particle counting and physical observables. On its auxiliary labelled cover, positions are in metres and momenta are in kg m s; the Hamiltonian is permutation invariant and the reference measure is The symmetric labelled law represents the quotient preparation; a one-particle marginal below means the law of a uniformly selected particle. For , define and use the canonical preparation of Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation. For the vacuum sector , define to be a singleton with reference measure , set , and use empty-product conventions ; thus . The mass parameter applies when particles are present; the vacuum sector has no mass coordinate. For all , set (metres) and For , the labelled-cover position coordinates are independent uniform points of and are independent of the momenta; all momentum components are independent centered Gaussians of variance . The joint law is permutation invariant. The energy satisfies and , with variance in J. With the adopted Boltzmann constant in J K and temperature in K from Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation, define and scale all box side lengths uniformly when varying , holding the shape, fixed. The model pressure has units J m (equivalently N m; Pa when ) and obeys . The fixed-reference entropy is and retains the chosen and convention.
For , the speed of a uniformly selected particle, in m s, has density Its squared-speed expectation, modal speed, and mean speed are in m s, in m s, and in m s, respectively.
For the separate grand-canonical branch of Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation, let be a chemical potential in joules and the dimensionless activity. Specify its full preparation on , where for and is the vacuum singleton. Use the sigma-algebra of sets whose slices are Borel, and adopt, whenever , the probability law The particle count is the map , . This full-law assumption supplements the sector weights; those weights alone do not determine the within-sector law. Then so and the conditional law given is the canonical law above.
A distinct three-dimensional classical ultra-relativistic model adopts for every , with in m s and in kg m s, in the same box volume in m. This extends the nonzero massless momentum formula continuously to only to define a density on all of ; the point has Lebesgue measure zero and no physical zero-momentum massless state is asserted. Its separate canonical partition function is with J and J. Define its fixed-volume heat capacity by ; it has units J K. Its three-dimensional pressure obeys and has units Pa. This branch is not obtained by setting in the Gaussian model and makes no photon-number or quantum-statistics claim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , the rectangular box with side lengths in metres and volume in m, one operationally indistinguishable species, kg, J s, J, and the Hamiltonian and symmetric reference measure in the Statement.
Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation: for a specified model with finite positive partition function, the canonical density is relative to its fixed reference; grand-sector weights are . This is an adopted preparation, not an equilibration theorem.
Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals: positive Gaussian coefficients have the stated Gaussian moments and finite products; gamma integrals, equal-scale gamma convolution, and moment differentiation follow from its explicit evaluations and Gamma recurrence.
Under , product Lebesgue measure agrees with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel rectangles (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}).
Lebesgue measure of a rectangular box is the product of its side lengths (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
The Lebesgue factors are sigma-finite; Tonelli factors nonnegative product integrals and Fubini factors absolutely integrable signed product integrals (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
Polar coordinates in give for nonnegative Borel , under ; by the unit-ball volume formula (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, The closed form for the volume of the unit -ball).
The Gaussian integrals and moments in [F2] are improper Riemann integrals. Under , their bounded truncations agree with Lebesgue integrals, and monotone convergence passes nonnegative truncations to the full line (Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands, Monotone convergence for the integral).
Massless test-particle action and momentum scale: the adopted massless test sector has nonzero future-null mechanical momentum and does not identify it with at .
Mechanical momentum and observer energy: for an observer with , define spatial momentum and observer energy ; in the massless sector is nonzero future null.
Observers, rest spaces and the spatial projection at an event: in a time-oriented Lorentzian background , is the smooth future timelike field; at an event is an observer, whose rest space is and whose spatial projection is .
The observer rest-space decomposition and the spatial projection: , and is positive definite on the three-dimensional rest space .
Classical particle counting and physical observables: for one operationally indistinguishable species, the symmetric labelled lift uses the factor ; label-specific one-particle marginals of a permutation-invariant state are interpreted as those of a uniformly selected particle.
The real exponential function and the number by a power series: is the everywhere-convergent series .
The exponential is positive and satisfies : and for real .
The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function: is the real natural logarithm on .
Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm gives and for positive ; finite iteration gives for integers .
Under , every point and coordinate hyperplane in is Lebesgue null (A box with a degenerate side is Lebesgue null, and so is every coordinate hyperplane in ).
The canonical probability laws, grand-sector weights and thermodynamic identifications are adopted as in [F1], with the full grand law specified in [A3]; the calculations establish conditional consequences only. The one-species operational indistinguishability and its permutation-invariant labelled lift are model assumptions as in [F12], not consequences of common mass.
The ultra-relativistic branch separately adopts the classical Hamiltonian in one observer's orthonormal spatial momentum coordinates. It is not a massless limit of the massive Hamiltonian and is not a quantum radiation model.
In the grand branch adopt the full law on the disjoint union and slice sigma-algebra specified in the Statement. In particular, for a Borel , . This is an additional preparation assumption, not a consequence of sector weights alone.
Proof
Given: , , the rectangular box with side lengths in metres and volume in , one operationally indistinguishable species, kg, J s, J, and the Hamiltonian and symmetric reference measure in the Statement.
By [F3], Euclidean Lebesgue measure in the position and momentum coordinates is their product measure; [F5] then factors the nonnegative normalization integral. The box-volume formula [F4] gives . Each of the scalar momentum factors contributes by [F2] and [F7]. Including the stipulated factor from [F12] yields .
For the separate massless branch, let denote the background's smooth future-timelike field from [F10] and normalize it at the event by . [F8] makes future null, so . By [F11], , hence . Identifying with its components in an orthonormal basis of the positive rest space gives the adopted with the stated units.
After normalization, the canonical density is the product of the uniform position density on and the scalar Gaussian momentum densities. For measurable coordinate rectangles, [F3] and [F5] show their probabilities factor; hence the positions and all momentum components are independent, each position is uniform on , and each momentum component is centered with variance by [F2].
In the grand preparation [A3] with sector weights from [F1], use the vacuum convention and substitute for all into the sector sum. With , [F13] gives , and [F14] gives the normalized sector weight . Each summand in [A3] is a nonnegative measure on its sector, so countable additivity and this finite positive total mass make a probability measure.
By [F6], the momentum integral for one ultra-relativistic particle is using [F2]. The point is Lebesgue null by [F18], so the continuous extension adds no massless zero-momentum state. Product measure and Tonelli [F3, F5] give the -particle product, and the stated positional/counting reference then gives .
Each scalar momentum coordinate has second moment and fourth moment from [F2]. Thus each term has mean and variance ; independence from step 2.1 makes means and variances add, giving the stated and .
For , write . The one-particle momentum density is . By [F6], for every Borel the probability that lies in is The substitution therefore gives the speed density on .
Shifting the index in the absolutely convergent series [F13] gives and . After normalization by [F14], and , hence . For each , step 2.2 gives . For any Borel , [A3] therefore gives , exactly the canonical law, including the vacuum singleton.
By [F17] and [A1], for fixed and fixed box shape. The log derivative [F16] gives , with in J m, and therefore . The entropy definition in [F1] gives with the same fixed and factorial convention.
The speed density is proportional to with . Its derivative has the sign of for , so its unique positive maximum occurs at . The second moment is by the gamma recurrence in [F2]. The mean is These are model-distribution moments, not values for an individual measured particle.
Under the normalized radial density proportional to , gamma moments give mean energy and variance per particle. Independence from the product preparation adds these to and ; differentiating at fixed with gives J K. Since is proportional to , [F16] gives and , with in Pa for this three-dimensional branch.
Remarks
The source M18 Ising-chain supplier is not used here. The massless momentum relation is a consequence of the adopted null-sector convention and the stated observer projection; the classical canonical preparation is a separate model assumption. No empirical data or precision are asserted.
Finite periodic Ising-ring correlations and exact decay
Finite periodic one-dimensional nearest-neighbor Ising ring with N>=2, exactly N indexed bonds, J>=0, zero field, and finite beta>0; no general long-range or higher-dimensional claim.
Statement
Use the real exponential of The real exponential function and the number by a power series and the hyperbolic functions , . Define ; the denominator is positive for every real . Let , let with cyclic indexing , and count exactly the indexed periodic bonds (so has two bonds). For coupling in joules, zero field, and in J, adopt the finite canonical law Set . For , For each fixed positive integer separation and , the correlation tends to , with absolute error at most . When , define the limiting correlation length in lattice spacings as the unique number satisfying for every positive integer separation ; equivalently, . The zero-field susceptibility per spin, defined by for the field-coupled law with energy , where the field parameter is in joules, has limit Both and have units J per spin (the spin variables are dimensionless). Define the finite-ring model free energy by and its limiting free energy per spin, when the limit exists, by . Then , analytic at every finite positive temperature. No statement is made for arbitrary one-dimensional interactions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite spin space , the stated bond convention, , , and finite .
Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation: each finite model uses its explicitly adopted canonical probability on the stated reference/counting space; the preparation is a model assumption.
One-dimensional periodic Ising-chain limit: for the periodic nearest-neighbor ring with , finite real and , the same and definitions give and . Its explicit eigenvalues satisfy , and the logarithmic partition limit and each fixed finite order of parameter derivatives converge uniformly on compact subsets of . This is the current published mathematical supplier for the exact indexed-bond model used here.
The exponential is positive and satisfies : for every real , hence the defined is positive and is well-defined.
The exponential function is strictly increasing: is continuous and implies .
A real-analytic function on an open subset of is locally represented by a convergent real power series: a real-valued function on an open interval is real analytic when each point has a neighborhood on which the function equals a convergent real power series.
The sum of a real power series is real analytic throughout the open interval determined by its radius: the sum of a real power series is real analytic on the interior of its radius of convergence; the exponential series has infinite radius.
Real-analytic functions are closed under sums, products and compositions, and under quotients where the denominator is nonzero: sums, products, quotients with nonzero denominator, and compositions of real-analytic functions on their open domains are real analytic.
[The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series): for , , so is real analytic near .
For the response clause, the field-coupled finite law is for real field parameter in joules; this is a finite model family, not an empirical magnetic law.
Proof
In the zero-field case the transfer matrix in [F2] is with , so . Direct multiplication gives orthonormal eigenvectors , with eigenvalues and . Hence , where . Since , [F4] gives , so ; [F2] gives . Thus .
By the finite preparation [F1], the partition sum is the normalization for the adopted law. Put ; then and . Expanding the finite canonical sum over the cyclic indices with inserted gives numerator . Evaluating this trace in the eigenbasis yields . Dividing by from step 1.1 gives the stated correlation formula.
The map preserves every bond product and reverses , so at zero field . For fixed , subtracting from the formula of step 2.1 gives ; its absolute value is at most because . Thus the fixed-distance limit is . When , writing gives ; for , and all nonzero-separation correlations vanish.
For the field-coupled finite law [A1], differentiating its finite numerator and denominator sums gives , where . At , spin-flip symmetry gives and translation invariance gives The finite geometric sum tends to as , so . This also gives when .
From step 1.1, . Since , the second term tends to zero, so . The correlation length diverges only in the excluded zero-temperature limit .
Fix any and put and . By [F5, F6, F7], and are real analytic near ; by [F3] and . Continuity from [F4] allows a smaller neighborhood where . By [F8], [F6], and the product law [F9], is real analytic there, and [F7] makes real analytic since . The relation is real analytic for , so the limit is analytic at every finite positive temperature as well.
Remarks
The transfer-matrix premise uses the published exact periodic-chain theorem. The local spin-insertion and finite-response arguments prove the additional correlation and susceptibility formulas. No Gaussian-tail research token is used as a supplier.
Exact Tonks hard-rod pressure and convergent virial series
Finite-N one-dimensional classical hard rods of common length a>=0 with L>Na and quadratic momenta; the Euclidean Lebesgue product and Jordan-volume calculations assume ACω; exact thermodynamic and virial statements only for this Tonks model, not an all-fluid cluster expansion.
Statement
Assume as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice () for the Euclidean Lebesgue product and Jordan-volume identifications below. Use the natural logarithm of The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function. Let , let be a hard-rod length in metres, and let be the one-dimensional box length in metres. Rod centers are with for . Let each rod have mass kg, momentum in kg m s, and Hamiltonian on the allowed configuration set, with infinite energy outside it. Adopt the reference , where is a fixed action in J s, and canonical inverse temperature in J. Put . Then Here is the one-dimensional force conjugate to length and has units N; it is not a three-dimensional pressure. With number density , the exact equation is After the first terms, the exact nonnegative remainder (strictly positive when ) is , bounded by whenever . At fixed with , as with , with finite-size excess between and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , , , , and the hard-core position set and Hamiltonian in the Statement.
Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation: for each specified model with finite positive partition function, the canonical density is relative to its fixed reference, and is the adopted free-energy definition.
Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals: for , and the normalized Gaussian has second moment ; the positive gamma integral is finite.
Change of variables for an injective map on a compact Jordan set: an injective map with nonzero Jacobian on an open neighborhood of a compact Jordan set obeys the compact Jordan change-of-variables formula.
The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function defines on positive reals; Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm makes it continuous and increasing with the product and quotient laws, and The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t gives and . Finite iteration of the product law gives the integer-power identity.
Under , Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the product of its coordinate factors, boxes have the product of their side lengths as measure, and bounded Jordan sets are Lebesgue measurable with measure equal to their Jordan content (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, Lebesgue outer measure is at most Jordan outer content, and a bounded Jordan measurable set is Lebesgue measurable with Lebesgue measure equal to its Jordan content).
Tonelli factors nonnegative product integrals and Fubini factors absolutely integrable signed product integrals on sigma-finite measure spaces (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
A bounded set is Jordan measurable when its boundary has content zero, and, for , a continuous graph over a closed nondegenerate rectangle in has content zero in (A bounded set in is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero, The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in has content zero in ).
The Gaussian moments in [F2] are improper Riemann integrals; on bounded intervals they agree with Lebesgue integrals under , and monotone convergence passes nonnegative truncations to the full line (Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands, Monotone convergence for the integral).
A closed bounded subset of is compact, in particular each closed box and the ordered simplex below (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line).
The finite hard-core configuration rule and indistinguishable-classical-particle reference convention are the adopted Tonks model assumptions; no interaction beyond hard exclusion is included.
Proof
The single-rod momentum Lebesgue integral is by [F2] and [F8]. By [F5] and Tonelli [F6], the momentum factors integrate to the product of these integrals. Dividing by gives .
By [F2] and the bounded Riemann-to-Lebesgue agreement in [F8], each normalized scalar momentum Gaussian has second moment . Thus the mean kinetic energy of each rod is and the total mean is .
Put . For , the allowed position set is , whose Lebesgue measure is directly by the box formula [F5]; no graph theorem is needed. For , the allowed labelled position set is a finite union of closed bounded ordering polytopes in , hence compact by [F9]. Its boundary is contained in finitely many box faces and contact hyperplanes , each contained in a graph of an affine function over a sufficiently large closed nondegenerate -dimensional coordinate rectangle, so [F7] makes it Jordan measurable. Fix one label ordering and sort its centers as . On that sector set ; the hard-core inequalities become the closed bounded, hence compact, ordered simplex by [F9]. Its boundary is contained in the box faces and finitely many tie hyperplanes, each contained in such an affine graph over a nondegenerate -dimensional rectangle; [F7] therefore makes Jordan measurable. The affine permutation map has absolute determinant , so [F3] preserves Jordan volume. The coordinate permutations of partition up to the tie hyperplanes, which have content zero by [F7]; their equal volumes sum to , hence each simplex has volume . The labelled order sectors cover the allowed set and overlap only on the stated content-zero contact hyperplanes. Therefore its Jordan content is , and [F5] gives the full labelled position Lebesgue measure .
The reference measure divides the position-momentum integral by . Product Lebesgue measure and Tonelli [F5, F6] separate the position measure from step 1.3 and the momentum integral from step 1.1. Thus .
By the product, quotient and integer-power laws in [F4], , using the logarithm derivative in [F4] at fixed gives . Substituting yields .
At , the virial series has first term and all higher terms zero, so its remainder after any terms is zero. For , the finite geometric identity gives the stated virial partial sum and exact remainder after multiplication by . If , then , proving the uniform bound.
At fixed , , so the laws in [F4] give For each integer , monotonicity of bounds its integral on between and . Summing gives For the sums and integral are empty and zero. Since [F4] gives , the integral is . Hence with . Substitution and [F4] cancel , yielding The excess is nonnegative and at most . Finally, , so that upper bound tends to zero and proves the stated thermodynamic limit.
Remarks
The infinite virial series is the geometric expansion of this exact one-dimensional hard-rod equation of state. It is not a formal or convergent cluster expansion for arbitrary fluids, attractions, dimensions, or interactions.
Finite spherical-shell gas and its exact marginal
Finite-N classical ideal kinetic energy for one operationally indistinguishable species, conditional on Countable Choice for the exact shell marginal, with a specifically adopted rotational Gaussian-direction preparation; no dynamical ergodicity or general coarea claim.
Statement
Assume as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (), the mathematical hypothesis required by the spherical-marginal supplier. Let , , and let have side lengths in metres and volume in . Let kg and joules, and set in kg m s. Take one operationally indistinguishable species of particles as specified by Classical particle counting and physical observables. On the auxiliary labelled cover, take independent uniform positions with density and, independently, the momentum law where has the independent standard-normal coordinate law defined in Exact spherical-shell coordinate marginal and fixed-block Gaussian limit and is assigned on the null event . This product law is invariant under particle permutations, so it defines the stated model preparation on the quotient; a one-particle marginal means the law of a uniformly selected particle. This is a specified spherical-shell preparation: almost surely, with no assumption about a trajectory or equilibration. For any momentum block of coordinates with , its density is from Exact spherical-shell coordinate marginal and fixed-block Gaussian limit. In particular the total-energy variance is zero J.
Compare the separate canonical ideal-gas preparation of Exact canonical and grand ideal-gas preparations with the same and one-species convention, at . Its mean total energy is also , but its variance is J. If , the uniformly selected particle's -component shell marginal has compact support because , whereas its canonical Gaussian momentum has positive probability outside every finite-radius ball. The two finite preparations therefore differ despite their matched mean energy. For , the full momentum vector is singular on its sphere and the density formula for is not asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the rectangular box with side lengths in metres and volume in m, the one-species operational indistinguishability assumption, particle number and dimension, positive mass and energy, shell radius , and the explicitly adopted independent position/spherical-momentum preparation in the Statement.
Declared example preparations and thermodynamic interpretation: each shell or product law is an explicitly adopted probability preparation, separate from a canonical law and not inferred from Hamiltonian dynamics.
Exact spherical-shell coordinate marginal and fixed-block Gaussian limit: assuming , for , , and , the independent standard-normal coordinate law has an orthogonally invariant direction; is concentrated on , its -coordinate marginal has the stated exact density, and its coordinate second moment is .
Exact canonical and grand ideal-gas preparations: for the massive -dimensional canonical ideal gas with , total energy has mean and variance , and each component of the uniformly selected particle's momentum is Gaussian with variance .
Classical particle counting and physical observables: for one operationally indistinguishable species, the labelled lift carries the symmetric permutation action and a permutation-invariant one-particle marginal is interpreted as the law of a uniformly selected particle.
This permutation-invariant spherical-shell law is a chosen finite classical distribution on one operationally indistinguishable species; it is not a claim that an isolated gas dynamically reaches it or that it is the only microcanonical convention.
Proof
Under the shell preparation [F1] and its explicit law [A1], almost surely by the definition of ; hence on every realization outside the null event . A constant random variable has variance zero.
For , the first momentum coordinates are the projection in [F2], so their exact Lebesgue density is the displayed , which vanishes outside the closed radius- ball. The event that this block has norm requires the remaining Gaussian coordinates to vanish; their joint density and imply that this event has probability zero.
Choose . By [F3], the canonical mean energy is and its variance is . Thus it cannot have the shell law of step 1.1, whose energy variance is zero.
If , then . Particle permutations act by orthogonal coordinate permutations on , so [F2] and [A1] make every particle block marginal identical; by the selected-particle convention [F4], their uniform mixture is the law of a uniformly selected particle. It has a density supported in the closed radius- ball, with no boundary atom by step 2.1. By [F3], the canonical Gaussian of a uniformly selected particle has strictly positive density at every point of , so its integral over the open annulus is positive, while the shell probability of that annulus is zero. Therefore the one-particle marginals differ as well. For , and the full shell law is singular, so no density assertion has been used.
Remarks
This result compares two stated finite probability laws. It proves no equivalence or inequivalence theorem for general thermodynamic ensembles and no dynamical equilibration claim.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.
Sources
- Michael E. Taylor, Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables (Advanced Calculus), §3.1, equations (3.1.72)–(3.1.75)
- NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, §5.2(i), Euler's integral
- Michael E. Taylor, Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables (Advanced Calculus), §§2.1–2.3
- Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th edition, Theorem 8.49
- Michael E. Taylor, Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables (Advanced Calculus), §3.1 and Chapter 4, §4.5
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §1.2, entropy as a functional of a specified state
- Michael E. Taylor, Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables (Advanced Calculus), §3.1
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §2.2.1, equipartition of quadratic degrees of freedom
- Mehran Kardar, MIT OpenCourseWare 8.333, Statistical Mechanics I, Lecture 13 (Fall 2013), IV.D
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §§1.2–1.5 and §2.2
- Mehran Kardar, MIT OpenCourseWare 8.333, Statistical Mechanics I, Lecture 14, §§IV.G and IV.I (Fall 2013)
- Mehran Kardar, MIT OpenCourseWare 8.333, Statistical Mechanics I, Lecture 14, IV.G (Fall 2013)
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §1.4.1, full grand-canonical state weights
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §§2.2–2.2.1 and §2.2.4
- Mehran Kardar, MIT OpenCourseWare 8.333, Statistical Mechanics I, Lecture 13, IV.D–IV.E (Fall 2013)
- Mehran Kardar, MIT OpenCourseWare 8.333, Statistical Mechanics I, Lecture 14, IV.G and IV.I (Fall 2013)
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §5.3.1, the one-dimensional Ising chain
- Mehran Kardar, MIT OpenCourseWare 8.333, Statistical Mechanics I, Lecture 14, IV.G (Fall 2013), finite spin partition examples
- University of Warwick, PX439/CO904 Statistical Mechanics of Complex Systems, lecture notes, §3.5 The Tonks gas
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §2.2, classical ideal-gas normalization
- Mehran Kardar, MIT OpenCourseWare 8.333, Statistical Mechanics I, Lecture 13, IV.D, finite microcanonical momentum sphere (Fall 2013)
- David Tong, Statistical Physics, §2.2, canonical ideal-gas momentum distribution