Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gaussian covariance for positive quadratic forms and a boundary counterexample

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let n≥1, let K∈Rn×n be symmetric positive definite, and let β>0. For x∈Rn put H(x)=12xTKx, and use the Euclidean Lebesgue measure λn to define the density Z−1e−βH(x). Then

Z=∫Rne−βH(x)dx=(2πβ)n/2(det⁡K)−1/2,E[x]=0,E[xxT]=β−1K−1,E[H]=n2β.

Positive definiteness and β>0 are essential for this normalized full-space Gaussian. The unrestricted identity E[x H′(x)]=β−1 is false without a boundary hypothesis: on [−L,L] with L>0 and H≡0, the normalized expectation on the left is 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, n≥1, symmetric positive-definite K, β>0, and H(x)=12xTKx on Rn.

[F1]

Gaussian, gamma and beta product integrals: for a>0, ∫Re−ax2dx=π/a, odd Gaussian moments vanish, and the second moment is π/(2a3/2).

[F2]

Under ACω, a C1 diffeomorphism transforms nonnegative Lebesgue integrals by its absolute Jacobian (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F3]

Under ACω, Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the finite product of one-dimensional Lebesgue measures on Borel rectangles, and each box has measure equal to the product of its side lengths (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included); each factor is sigma-finite. Tonelli factors nonnegative products, and Fubini factors absolutely integrable signed products (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F4]

The Gaussian integrals and moments in [F1] are improper Riemann integrals. On bounded intervals they agree with Lebesgue integrals under ACω, and monotone convergence passes their nonnegative truncations to R (Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands, Monotone convergence for the integral).

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

We construct R with K=RTR by induction on n. For n=1, take R=K11>0. For n>1, write K=(abTbC); positive definiteness gives a>0 and S:=C−bbT/a positive definite, since yTSy=(−bTy/a,y)TK(−bTy/a,y)>0 for y≠0. By induction S=R1TR1; then R=(abT/a0R1) satisfies RTR=K. Its diagonal entries are positive, so det⁡R>0; taking determinants gives det⁡K=(det⁡R)2 and therefore det⁡R=det⁡K.

2.1givenF1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Put T(x)=Rx. This is a C1 diffeomorphism of Rn with ∣det⁡DT∣=det⁡R. Since H(x)=∣Rx∣2/2, [F2] gives Z=(det⁡R)−1∫Rne−β∣y∣2/2 dλn(y). By [F3], λn is the finite product of n sigma-finite one-dimensional Lebesgue measures; Tonelli and the factorization e−β∣y∣2/2=∏ie−βyi2/2 give the integral as I0(β/2)n. By [F1] and [F4], I0(β/2)=2π/β. Hence Z=(2π/β)n/2(det⁡K)−1/2, which is finite and positive.

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra

Let Y have the normalized density proportional to e−β∣y∣2/2 with respect to λn. For each i, [F3] and Tonelli factor the nonnegative second-moment integral into I1(β/2)I0(β/2)n−1, while the normalizer is I0(β/2)n; [F1] gives E[Yi2]=I1(β/2)/I0(β/2)=1/β. Also ∫∣yi∣e−β∣y∣2/2dλn<∞, since ∣yi∣≤1+yi2 and the same Tonelli factorization makes both integrals finite. For i≠j, ∣yiyj∣≤(yi2+yj2)/2, so the cross moments are absolutely integrable. Fubini [F3] factors these signed moments; the one-dimensional first and odd moments vanish by [F1]. Thus E[Y]=0 and E[YYT]=β−1I.

4.1F2step 1.1step 3.1algebra

By [F2], the normalized law of X is the pullback of the law of Y under x=R−1y. The absolute integrability established in step 3.1 permits the same change of variables for signed first and second moments by applying [F2] to their positive and negative parts. Hence E[X]=0 and E[XXT]=R−1(β−1I)R−T=β−1(RTR)−1=β−1K−1. Since H(X)=∣Y∣2/2, summing the diagonal second moments gives E[H]=n/(2β).

5.1givenF3algebra∎

For the stated boundary counterexample, the density on [−L,L] is the constant (2L)−1 because H=0 and the normalizing integral is 2L by [F3]. Since H′(x)=0 everywhere, E[xH′(x)]=0≠β−1 for β>0.

Remarks

If K has a nonzero kernel, the integrand is constant along an unbounded kernel direction and Z=∞; if β≤0, the full-space integral also diverges. The theorem does not assert a named-degree-of-freedom equipartition rule on arbitrary domains or for discrete variables.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources