How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Spectral analyticity on the modular strip
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a complex Hilbert space and let be a self-adjoint operator whose spectral projection valued measure is supported on . For , put . Define For and , define by the unbounded Borel functional calculus for the function . This vector is defined, strongly continuous in on , and satisfies The map is norm-holomorphic on the open strip .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a complex Hilbert space , a self-adjoint with spectral measure supported on , and .
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
On nonzero , the unbounded self-adjoint spectral theorem supplies ; on use the zero PVM. The scalar spectral measure is , with total mass (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form), Integral of a measurable function against a projection-valued measure).
Under Countable Choice, the truncation-defined PVM integral has domain and satisfies on this domain, including on the zero space (The unbounded PVM integral is densely defined, closed and normal). The assumed Choice supplies Countable Choice by restricting the families to countable ones. Finite linear combinations of multipliers agree with the corresponding combinations of their integrals on the common domain, by the sum and product clauses of Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping (apply the product clause to constants for scalar multiples). Multipliers on are extended by zero on its -null complement.
Dominated convergence applies on an arbitrary measure space when one integrable majorant dominates the sequence (Dominated convergence).
Proof
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3] and the Statement data.
Write with . The spectral multiplier has . Since for every and , [F2] gives This also proves that every vector named in the Statement is in the domain of the indicated multiplier.
If in , then pointwise and The majorant is integrable by . Dominated convergence applied to the scalar spectral measure therefore gives , proving strong continuity on the closed strip.
Fix with . Choose so that . For , the scalar difference quotient of along the segment from to is bounded by When this is bounded by , and when it is bounded by . The first expression has a finite supremum and the second is bounded by a constant depending on times . Thus the difference quotients are dominated in by a constant times . Their pointwise limit is . Dominated convergence in the spectral norm proves that the vector difference quotient converges in to the spectral integral of this limit. Hence the vector map is complex-differentiable at .
Step 2.2 applies at every point of , so the vector map is norm-holomorphic throughout the open strip. The estimate and closed-strip continuity were proved in steps 1.1 and 2.1.
Depends on
The Axiom of Choice
Unbounded linear operators: domain, graph and extension
Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators
Integral of a measurable function against a projection-valued measure
The unbounded PVM integral is densely defined, closed and normal
Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)
Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping
Dominated convergence