How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational powers do not depend on the representative
Statement
Let with , and let and with satisfy in (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). Then
Consequently the value of Rational powers of a positive base depends only on the rational and not on the representative chosen for it, so Rational powers of a positive base really does define a function on . The same conclusion holds in the supplementary case with (Order on the rationals), where every representative gives the value .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real , integers , and naturals with in .
Roots (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ): is the unique with , and when ; likewise for .
Laws of integer exponents (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers ): for and integers , and .
Injectivity of on the nonnegatives for (Monotonicity of and of ); and a positive element has positive integer powers, since gives for and (Monotonicity of and of , Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).
Equality of rationals (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): holds exactly when in .
Positivity of a rational and of its numerator (Order on the rationals, Order on the integers, The naturals embed in the integers): the order on is read off any representative with positive denominator, and on such a representative one has exactly when in ; a positive integer is the image of a unique natural , so then .
Proof
Put and ; since we have and , hence and .
The hypothesis says exactly that in , and .
Raising to the power and using the iterated-power law twice: .
The same computation for : .
Since , the two right-hand sides agree, so .
Both and are positive and , so injectivity of on the nonnegatives forces , which is the displayed identity; hence is independent of the representative, and in the supplementary case with every representative of with has in , hence , so for all of them.
Depends on
Rational powers of a positive base
Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with
Monotonicity of and of
Laws of integer exponents
The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers
Integer powers
Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
Order on the rationals
Order on the integers
The naturals embed in the integers