Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational powers ar of a positive base

Definition

Let a∈R with a>0 and let r∈Q (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).

Every rational has a representative with positive denominator (Every rational has a positive-denominator representative), so write r=m/n with m∈Z and n a positive integer; a positive integer is the image of a unique natural ≥1 (The naturals embed in the integers), and we write n for that natural too. Define

ar:=(a1/n)m,

where a1/n is the unique nonnegative n-th root of a (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a) and the outer exponent is an integer power (Integer powers am). The outer power is legitimate because a1/n>0 when a>0, so it has an inverse and negative integer exponents are allowed.

Well-definedness. The right-hand side must not depend on which representative m/n of r was chosen. It does not: that is Rational powers do not depend on the representative ↗, which is recorded in this item's justified_by rather than in its deps, since it is a statement about the operation defined here and therefore depends on this definition.

The base must be positive. For a<0 the same formula is not a definition at all, because different representatives of the same rational give different answers, or no answer: see FALSE: am/n:=(a1/n)m extends to negative bases, which is exactly the item that justifies the restriction.

Supplementary clause for the base 0. For a=0 and rational r>0 (Order on the rationals) the displayed formula still makes sense and still does not depend on the representative: r>0 forces m≥1, and (01/n)m=0m=0 (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a applies to every a≥0). So we set 0r=0 for rational r>0. For r<0 the expression 0r is left undefined, since 0 has no inverse. This clause is what lets the inequalities later on this page be stated for nonnegative entries rather than for positive ones only.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources