Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: am/n:=(a1/n)m extends to negative bases

Statement

False claim: the definition am/n:=(a1/n)m of Rational powers ar of a positive base extends to negative bases, that is, the same formula assigns to every a<0 and every r∈Q a real number ar, depending only on a and on the rational r.

This is the claim that Rational powers ar of a positive base rules out by insisting on a>0, and this item is the reason for that restriction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The base a=−8 and the rational r=1/3; the formula under test is am/n=(a1/n)m, in which a1/n has to denote a real number whose n-th power is a (Rational powers ar of a positive base, Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a).

[A1]

Numerals denote canonical naturals. For a natural k the symbol k inside R denotes the image k⋅1R, where ι:Q→R is the canonical order-preserving field embedding; these field images are positive for natural k≥1, and ι preserves products (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field). So 8>0, and therefore −8<0, since x>0 means x∈P and 0−(−x)=x∈P says −x<0 (Ordered field; none of the items just named states this passage from a positive element to its negative). Also 23=2⋅2⋅2=8 (Integer powers am). This is where the numerals of this item enter R; the order on Q (Order on the rationals) is not what is being used when we write −8<0 in R.

[A2]

The same rational has many representatives: 1/3=2/6 in Q, since 1⋅6=3⋅2 (The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). For a formula in m and n to define a function of r, all representatives must give the same value, which for positive bases is Rational powers do not depend on the representative.

[A3]

No real has sixth power −8: for every x∈R, x6=(x3)2 (Laws of integer exponents, claim 1, Integer powers am), and a square is nonnegative because a nonzero one is positive (Squares of nonzero elements are positive) while 02=0⋅0=0 (Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0); so x6≥0, whereas −8<0 in R by [A1].

[A4]

Exactly one real has cube −8, namely −2: if x3=−8<0 then x<0, since x≥0 would give x3≥0; and then y:=−x>0 satisfies y3=−x3=8, so y=81/3=2 by uniqueness of the nonnegative cube root, whence x=−2 (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a, Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Sign rules for products: (−a)b=−(ab) and (−a)(−b)=ab).

Refutation

technique · contradiction
1.1assume-contragivenA2

Assume, for contradiction, that the formula does define ar for negative a and every rational r, depending only on a and r; then in particular (−8)1/3 is a real number, and the value obtained from any representative m/n of the rational 1/3 is that same number.

2.1step 1.1A1A4

Read through the representative 1/3: the formula gives (−8)1/3=((−8)1/3)1, where (−8)1/3 is a real cube root of −8, and there is exactly one such real, namely −2; so the value is −2.

2.2step 1.1A1A3

Read through the representative 2/6: the formula gives (−8)2/6=((−8)1/6)2, and (−8)1/6 must be a real sixth root of −8, of which there is none.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2A2

The two readings are incompatible: by the assumption the rational 1/3=2/6 has a single value, which step 2.1 computes to be −2, while step 2.2 shows that the very expression the formula prescribes for the representative 2/6 names nothing at all in R.

4.1step 3.1step 1.1A2A3discharge-contradiction∎

The assumption therefore fails, and the failure is not an artefact of the chosen numbers: every rational r has representatives with even denominator, and a negative base has no real root of even order by the argument of [A3], so for a negative base the formula depends on the representative and Rational powers do not depend on the representative genuinely breaks down; this is exactly why Rational powers ar of a positive base requires a>0.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources