Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Laws of rational exponents

Statement

Let a,b∈R with a,b>0 and let r,s∈Q, with rational powers as in Rational powers ar of a positive base. Then:

  1. ar>0.
  2. ar+s=aras.
  3. (ab)r=arbr; in particular (ab)1/N=a1/Nb1/N for every natural N≥1.
  4. a−r=(ar)−1=1/ar.
  5. (ar)s=ars.

Claims 2 and 3 persist in the supplementary case of Rational powers ar of a positive base: for a,b≥0 and rationals r,s>0 (Order on the rationals) one still has (ab)r=arbr and ar+s=aras. The two identities degenerate differently, and it is worth saying how. In the product identity, a zero base on either side makes both sides 0. In the addition identity only the base a occurs, so it degenerates only when a=0, and then both sides are 0; when a>0 that identity holds with no hypothesis on b at all.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals a,b>0 and rationals r,s.

[L1]

Definition and well-definedness (Rational powers ar of a positive base, Rational powers do not depend on the representative): for ANY representative r=m/N with m∈Z and N≥1 natural, ar=(a1/N)m; and a1/N is the unique x≥0 with xN=a (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a), which is >0 when a>0.

[L2]

Laws of integer exponents (Laws of integer exponents, Integer powers am): for x,y≠0 and integers j,k, xj+k=xjxk, (xj)k=xjk, (xy)j=xjyj and x−j=(xj)−1.

[L3]

Positivity and injectivity: x>0 implies xj>0 for every NATURAL j (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an, claim 1), and hence for every integer j, since x−j=(xj)−1 (Laws of integer exponents, claim 2) and the inverse of a positive element is positive (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order); and x↦xN is injective on {x≥0} for N≥1 (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an, claim 2).

[L4]

Rational arithmetic (Arithmetic on the rationals, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers): any two rationals can be written with a common positive denominator, m/N+k/N=(m+k)/N, −(m/N)=(−m)/N, and (m/n)(p/q)=(mp)/(nq).

[L5]

The order on Q (The rationals form a totally ordered field, Order on the rationals) is compatible with addition, so r>0 and s>0 imply r+s>0.

[L6]

The supplementary clause of Rational powers ar of a positive base: 0t=0 for every rational t>0, while 0t is left undefined for rational t<0 and the convention 00=1 of Integer powers am is untouched. In a field, a product with a factor 0 is 0 (Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L4

Choose a common denominator: there are a natural N≥1 and integers m,k with r=m/N and s=k/N; then r+s=(m+k)/N and −r=(−m)/N.

1.2L1L2L3

Roots of a product: for a,b>0 and N≥1 the element a1/Nb1/N is positive and satisfies (a1/Nb1/N)N=(a1/N)N(b1/N)N=ab, so by uniqueness of the nonnegative N-th root (ab)1/N=a1/Nb1/N.

2.1step 1.1L1L3

Claim 1: ar=(a1/N)m with a1/N>0, and a positive element has positive integer powers, so ar>0.

2.2step 1.1step 1.2L1L2

Claim 3: (ab)r=((ab)1/N)m=(a1/Nb1/N)m=(a1/N)m(b1/N)m=arbr, using the root-of-a-product identity and then the integer product law.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L2

Claim 2: ar+s=(a1/N)m+k=(a1/N)m(a1/N)k=aras, the middle equality being the integer addition law applied to the nonzero base a1/N.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1L1L2

Claim 4: a−r=(a1/N)−m=((a1/N)m)−1=(ar)−1.

3.3step 2.1L1L2L3L4

Claim 5: write r=m/n and s=p/q with n,q≥1, and put x:=a1/(nq), so x>0 and xnq=a; then (xq)n=xqn=a with xq>0, so xq=a1/n by uniqueness of the nonnegative n-th root; putting z:=xm we get z>0 and zq=(xm)q=(xq)m=(a1/n)m=ar, so z is the nonnegative q-th root of ar, that is z=(ar)1/q; therefore (ar)s=((ar)1/q)p=zp=(xm)p=xmp=(a1/(nq))mp=a(mp)/(nq)=ars.

3.4step 2.2L6

The supplementary nonnegative case, product identity: let a,b≥0 and let r>0 be rational; if a>0 and b>0 this is step 2.2, and otherwise a=0 or b=0, so ab=0 and the left side is 0r=0, while the right side arbr has a factor 0r=0 and is therefore 0 as well.

4.1step 3.1L5L6

The supplementary nonnegative case, addition identity: the identity ar+s=aras involves the base a only, so nothing need be assumed about b; for a>0 it is step 3.1 verbatim, which uses only a>0, and both sides are then positive rather than 0; for a=0 the exponents satisfy r+s>0, so the left side is 0r+s=0 and the right side is 0⋅0=0.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 2.2step 3.3step 3.4step 4.1∎

All five claims hold for positive bases and arbitrary rational exponents, together with the two supplementary identities for nonnegative bases and positive rational exponents.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources