How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
regular element reduction preserves minimal resolution
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be nonzero Noetherian local, let be a nonzero finite module, and let be a nonzerodivisor on both and . Reducing a minimal free resolution of modulo gives a minimal free resolution of over . Moreover , including infinity. For the zero-complex assertion also holds, with both projective dimensions zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
The balanced Tor bifunctor: For a right -module , a left -module , and , define to be either for a projective resolution of or for a projective resolution of , identified by the preceding natural balance isomorphism. On maps it uses the homology maps induced by comparison maps; coherence makes this a well-defined covariant bifunctor.
Tor is symmetric over a commutative ring: If is commutative and are -modules, then naturally.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
The complex resolves . Tensoring it with has no positive homology since multiplication by is injective on . Balance and symmetry of Tor show that reducing any free resolution of modulo has no positive homology and degree-zero homology .
AC licenses the existence in [F1], the use of Nakayama [F5], and the projective-dimension criterion [F2]. A minimal degreewise finite resolution exists, and its matrices reduce to entries in . Its finite ranks do not change on reduction to the nonzero local ring . Nakayama gives , so the last-nonzero-Betti criterion identifies both projective dimensions with the same last nonzero rank, or infinity if ranks persist arbitrarily far. For choose the zero complex on both sides.