Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spin(8) four-form chirality weights

Statement

Use the oriented Euclidean space V=R8, the positive-root system, fundamental weights λ3,λ4, and chirality convention of Spin(8) Clifford modules, real forms, and D4 weights. For g∈Spin⁡(8), let ρg:V→V be its vector action and define its action on Λ4V by g⋅(v1∧⋯∧v4)=ρg(v1)∧⋯∧ρg(v4), extended linearly. Equip Λ4V with the Gram inner product ⟨v1∧⋯∧v4,w1∧⋯∧w4⟩=det⁡(⟨vi,wj⟩)i,j=14, and let ω=e1∧⋯∧e8 be the oriented unit volume form. Define ⋆:Λ4V→Λ4V by the Hodge identity α∧⋆β=⟨α,β⟩ω for all α,β∈Λ4V. Set Λ±4V=ker⁡(⋆∓I). Then ⋆ is equivariant for the specified Spin(8) action, each real eigenspace has dimension 35 and is irreducible, and their complexifications are irreducible modules of highest weights 2λ4 and 2λ3, respectively. Thus the + label here means self-dual for the specified orientation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The oriented Euclidean V=R8 and the Cartan, root, weight, and Spin(8)-action conventions in Spin(8) Clifford modules, real forms, and D4 weights.

[F1]

The Spin(8) modules have invariant positive-definite inner products; the Cartan weights of VC are ±ξj, and so(8,C) has positive roots ξi±ξj for i<j and fundamental weights λ3,λ4 (Spin(8) Clifford modules, real forms, and D4 weights). The vector action of the full-even Spin group maps onto SO(V) (Real Pin and full-even Spin images, kernels, and definite compactness).

[F2]

The Gram pairing on Λ4V is the determinant of vector inner products; the oriented unit volume form is ω=e1∧⋯∧e8; and ⋆ is the unique map satisfying α∧⋆β=⟨α,β⟩ω. In the oriented orthonormal basis, ⋆eI=ε(I)eIc (The Gram inner product on ΛkV, The oriented unit volume form, The Hodge star on an oriented finite-dimensional real inner-product space, The Hodge star exists uniquely and is given by the complementary-basis formula in an oriented orthonormal basis).

[F3]

A weight is dominant integral when all its simple-coroot pairings are nonnegative integers; each fundamental weight has pairings 0 or 1 and is dominant integral, so 2λ3 and 2λ4 are dominant integral (Fundamental weights, Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights).

[F4]

Finite-dimensional irreducible representations of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra are classified by dominant integral highest weights, assuming the Axiom of Choice (Highest-weight classification).

[F5]

The Weyl dimension formula gives dim⁡L(μ)=∏α∈Φ+(μ+ρ,α)/(ρ,α) for dominant integral μ, under the Axiom of Choice (The Weyl dimension formula).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice, as defined in The Axiom of Choice, is assumed for the Lie-theory conventions and highest-weight claims in [F1] and the dominant-integral convention in [F3], and exactly for the classification and dimension formula in [F4] and [F5].

Proof

1.1givenF1F2constructalgebra

The basis formula in [F2] gives ⋆2eI=(−1)4(8−4)eI=eI for every four-element index set I, so ⋆ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues ±1. Its matrix on the 70 basis vectors has zero diagonal because Ic≠I, so its trace is zero; the two eigenspaces therefore each have dimension 35. The vector action ρg lies in SO(V) by [F1]. Its induced action preserves the Gram inner product, since each pairing ⟨ρgvi,ρgwj⟩ equals ⟨vi,wj⟩, and it fixes ω because its determinant is 1. Applying it to the Hodge identity shows g⋅⋆β satisfies the defining identity for ⋆(g⋅β); uniqueness in [F2] gives g⋅⋆=⋆ g⋅.

2.1F1F5A1step 1.1algebra

Put wj+=e2j−1+ie2j and wj−=e2j−1−ie2j. With the Cartan basis Hj=−iRj fixed in Spin(8) Clifford modules, real forms, and D4 weights, the vectors wj± have weights ±ξj. For signs sj∈{+1,−1}, expansion in the ordered real basis gives ⋆(w1s1∧⋯∧w4s4)=(s1s2s3s4)(w1s1∧⋯∧w4s4). Indeed, a term with k even-indexed basis vectors has Hodge sign (−1)k, and the ratio of its coefficient to that of the complementary term is (−1)k∏jsj, so every complementary pair has the displayed common eigenvalue. The vectors w1+∧⋯∧w4+ and w1+∧w2+∧w3+∧w4− therefore lie in the + and − eigenspaces and have weights 2λ4=ξ1+ξ2+ξ3+ξ4 and 2λ3=ξ1+ξ2+ξ3−ξ4, respectively. Each is killed by every positive-root operator: adding any positive root ξi±ξj with i<j gives a coordinate 2, while every Λ4VC weight is a sum of four distinct weights among ±ξj and has coordinates in {−1,0,1}. For either μ=2λ4=(1,1,1,1) or μ=2λ3=(1,1,1,−1), the shifted-coordinate squares (μi+ρi)2 are (16,9,4,1), where ρ=12∑α∈Φ+α=(3,2,1,0). Pairing the positive roots ξi±ξj in the Weyl dimension formula gives denominator ∏i<j(ρi2−ρj2)=4320 and numerator ∏i<j((μi+ρi)2−(μj+ρj)2)=7⋅12⋅15⋅5⋅8⋅3=151200 for either weight. Thus each corresponding irreducible module has dimension 151200/4320=35.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1

The + eigenspace is Spin(8)-invariant by step 1.1, and the positive-definite Gram inner product from the Statement complexifies to a positive-definite invariant Hermitian form by step 1.1. Orthogonal complements therefore decompose this finite-dimensional complex representation into irreducible submodules, and the corresponding orthogonal projections commute with the Lie-algebra action. A nonzero projection of the highest-weight vector in step 2.1 is still killed by all positive-root operators and has weight 2λ4. By [F3] this weight is dominant integral; its summand is L(2λ4) by [F4], and its dimension is 35 by the Weyl calculation in step 2.1. The whole complexified + eigenspace has dimension 35 by step 1.1, so that summand is the entire eigenspace; it is irreducible of highest weight 2λ4. A nonzero real invariant subspace complexifies to this whole 35-dimensional complex module, so its real dimension is 35 and it is the full real eigenspace. Thus the real + eigenspace is irreducible.

4.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

The − eigenspace is Spin(8)-invariant by step 1.1, and the positive-definite Gram inner product from the Statement complexifies to a positive-definite invariant Hermitian form by step 1.1. Orthogonal complements therefore decompose this finite-dimensional complex representation into irreducible submodules, and the corresponding orthogonal projections commute with the Lie-algebra action. A nonzero projection of the highest-weight vector in step 2.1 is still killed by all positive-root operators and has weight 2λ3. By [F3] this weight is dominant integral; its summand is L(2λ3) by [F4], and its dimension is 35 by the Weyl calculation in step 2.1. Since the whole complexified − eigenspace has dimension 35 by step 1.1, it equals this summand and is irreducible of highest weight 2λ3. A nonzero real invariant subspace complexifies to this whole 35-dimensional complex module, so its real dimension is 35 and it is the full real eigenspace. Thus the real − eigenspace is irreducible.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources