Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spin(8) Clifford modules, real forms, and D4 weights

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. In the Clifford construction of the preceding definition, Δ is a 16-dimensional irreducible complex module for Cl(V,Q)⊗RC. Its volume eigenspaces Δ+ and Δ− each have complex dimension 8, and the conjugate-linear involution J preserves both, commutes with Spin(8), and has fixed real spaces whose complexifications are Δ+ and Δ−. The resulting real modules 8v,8s,8c are irreducible, and the inner products specified in the definition are positive-definite and Spin(8)-invariant. The Clifford action satisfies gc(v)g−1=c(ρgv) and maps each volume eigenspace to the other. Spin(8) is generated by the lifts of coordinate-plane rotations together with its central kernel {1,−1}, and their infinitesimal actions on Δ are CiCj/2.

For the Lie-algebra weights, define Rj∈so(V) by Rje2j−1=−e2j, Rje2j=e2j−1, and Rjek=0 for k∉{2j−1,2j}. Put Hj=−iRj∈so(8,C), h=span⁡C{H1,H2,H3,H4}, and define ξj∈h∗ by ξj(Hk)=δjk. On E=span⁡R{ξ1,…,ξ4} use the Euclidean inner product (ξi,ξj)=δij. Then h is a Cartan subalgebra; the complexified rotation Lie algebra so(8,C) is simple with root system {±ξi±ξj:i<j}. Choose the positive roots ξi−ξj and ξi+ξj for i<j. The simple roots are α1=ξ1−ξ2, α2=ξ2−ξ3, α3=ξ3−ξ4, and α4=ξ3+ξ4, with fundamental weights λ1=ξ1, λ2=ξ1+ξ2, λ3=(ξ1+ξ2+ξ3−ξ4)/2, and λ4=(ξ1+ξ2+ξ3+ξ4)/2. The complexifications of 8v,8c,8s have highest weights λ1,λ3,λ4, respectively; reversing chirality exchanges λ3 and λ4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard oriented Euclidean space V=R8, the plus-Q Clifford action on Δ=Λ∙C4 and the real structure J defined in Spin(8) vector and half-spin modules, and the full-even Spin group acting on V and Δ.

[F1]

The module construction fixes C2j−1=ϵj+ιj, C2j=i(ϵj−ιj), ω=C1⋯C8, Δ±=ker⁡(ω∓I), and J=C2C4C6C8K (Spin(8) vector and half-spin modules).

[F2]

The full-even Spin group maps onto SO(V,Q); its kernel is {1,−1}, and it is compact for definite Q (Real Pin and full-even Spin images, kernels, and definite compactness).

[F3]

For an eight-dimensional vector space, the Clifford algebra has dimension 28=256 over its base field (PBW basis and exterior associated graded for a Clifford algebra).

[F4]

A linear map from V to a unital associative algebra that satisfies f(v)2=Q(v)1 extends uniquely to a unital Clifford algebra homomorphism (Universal property of the Clifford algebra).

[F5]

For a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra, a Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent self-normalizing Lie subalgebra; relative to it, roots and root spaces are defined by the simultaneous eigenspaces of ad⁡(h), and weights and weight spaces of a representation are defined by the analogous simultaneous eigenspaces of h (Finite-dimensional Lie algebra, Cartan subalgebra, Root and root space, Representations of Lie algebras, Weight and weight space).

[F6]

A positive system is fixed by a regular vector in the Euclidean root span; its positive-root subalgebra is the sum of the positive root spaces. The root order is μ≤λ when λ−μ is a nonnegative integral combination of the chosen simple roots. A highest-weight vector is a nonzero weight vector annihilated by that positive-root subalgebra; fundamental weights are dual to the simple coroots (Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system, Positive systems and simple roots, Positive and negative nilpotent subalgebras and the Borel, Root order on weights, Highest-weight vectors and modules, Fundamental weights).

[F7]

A finite-dimensional nonabelian complex Lie algebra with no nonzero proper ideals is simple; a simple Lie algebra is semisimple under the convention that semisimple means having no nonzero solvable ideal (Lie subalgebras, ideals, and center, Derived series and solvable Lie algebras, Finite semisimple Lie algebras and the symmetric adjoint action).

[F8]

The Lie-algebra coroot of a root is hα=2Hα/α(Hα), where the Killing-dual vector satisfies B(Hα,H)=α(H) for every H∈h (Coroot of a Lie-algebra root, Killing-dual vector of a root).

[F9]

The Killing form on a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra is B(X,Y)=tr⁡g(ad⁡Xad⁡Y) (Finite semisimple Lie algebras and the symmetric adjoint action).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is retained as a hypothesis of the imported positive-root subalgebra, root-order, and highest-weight definitions in [F6] and the Killing-dual and coroot definitions in [F8] (The Axiom of Choice). Step 1.3 uses the [F8] definitions to identify the coroots, and step 5.1 uses the [F6] definitions to identify the highest weights. The explicit finite-dimensional calculations do not assert that AC is necessary for these particular constructions.

Proof

1.1givenF1F4algebra

On the ordered wedge basis uI=ui1∧⋯∧uir, exterior multiplication and deletion satisfy ϵj2=ιj2=0, ϵjϵk+ϵkϵj=0, ιjιk+ιkιj=0, and ϵjιk+ιkϵj=δjkI: if a deletion index is absent its term is zero, and when both orders are nonzero they differ by one transposition. Expanding C2j−1 and C2j therefore gives CaCb+CbCa=2δabI for all a,b, so [F4] defines a representation of the complexified Clifford algebra on Δ.

1.2F7algebra

Put g=so(8,C)={X∈M8(C):XT=−X} with its commutator bracket. For 1≤a<b≤8 let Eab be the standard matrix unit and put Xab=Eab−Eba; these form a complex basis of g, and write Xba=−Xab when indices are reversed. Let D be the finite group of diagonal matrices D=diag⁡(ε1,…,ε8) with εi∈{±1} and ∏iεi=1. Each D is a product of coordinate-plane rotations by π, so its adjoint action preserves every ideal I⊴g: each rotation is an exponential, and exp⁡(tad⁡X) preserves any subspace stable under ad⁡X. Since Ad⁡D(Xab)=εaεbXab, the characters D↦εaεb are distinct for distinct unordered pairs (their symmetric difference has size 2 or 4, so it is neither empty nor the full coordinate set). For X=∑a<bcabXab∈I, the average ∣D∣−1∑D∈D(εaεb)Ad⁡D(X) equals cabXab: the coefficient of Xcd is multiplied by the average of the character D↦(εaεb)(εcεd), which is 1 when the pairs agree and 0 otherwise. For a nontrivial character the latter average is zero by pairing each D with D0D, where its value at D0 is −1. If I≠0, one such coefficient is nonzero, hence Xab∈I. For k∉{a,b}, brackets with Xbk put each Xak in I, and brackets among these incident basis elements give every Xkl with k,l≠a. Thus I=g. Since [X12,X23]=X13≠0, g is nonabelian and simple. A solvable ideal is therefore 0 or g; the latter is impossible because [g,g] is a nonzero ideal and hence equals g, so every term of the derived series is g. Thus g is semisimple by [F7].

1.3A1F8F9algebra

Define wj+=e2j−1+ie2j and wj−=e2j−1−ie2j. The commuting elements Hj=−iRj act on wj± with eigenvalues ±1. Extend the Euclidean inner product on V complex-bilinearly to VC. The map u∧v↦(x↦⟨u,x⟩v−⟨v,x⟩u) is an isomorphism Λ2VC≅so(8,C): the basis wedges map to a basis of skew matrices. The identity [H,Xu,v]=XHu,v+Xu,Hv shows its nonzero simultaneous h-weights are ±ξi±ξj for i<j, with one-dimensional eigenspaces; its zero-weight space is h. If Y=Y0+∑αYα normalizes h, then [H,Y]∈h for every H∈h, so α(H)Yα=0 for every H and each nonzero root α; hence all Yα=0 and Y∈h. Thus h is self-normalizing; it is abelian and therefore nilpotent, so it is Cartan by [F5]. The displayed roots form a reduced crystallographic root system: they span R4; all have squared length 2, so each root line contains only that root and its negative; reflections in ξi−ξj swap coordinates i,j, while reflections in ξi+ξj send (xi,xj) to (−xj,−xi), so both preserve the root set; and 2(β,α)/(α,α)=(β,α)∈Z for all roots α,β. For the regular vector (4,3,2,1), the positive roots are exactly ξi−ξj and ξi+ξj with i<j. The four αi are linearly independent, and every positive difference is a nonnegative sum of adjacent differences; the positive sums decompose as ξ3+ξ4=α4, ξ2+ξ4=α2+α4, ξ2+ξ3=α2+α3+α4, ξ1+ξ4=α1+α2+α4, ξ1+ξ3=α1+α2+α3+α4, and ξ1+ξ2=α1+2α2+α3+α4. Thus these four simple roots are a basis of E=span⁡RΦ. For Hp,Hq, the Killing form is B(Hp,Hq)=∑α∈Φα(Hp)α(Hq)=12δpq: each root space is one-dimensional with weight α, the zero-weight space h contributes 0, and summing over the roots gives 12 when p=q and 0 otherwise. For α=ξi±ξj, its Killing-dual vector is therefore Hα=(Hi±Hj)/12, so α(Hα)=1/6 and its Lie-algebra coroot from [F8] is hα=Hi±Hj. In particular the simple coroots are H1−H2,H2−H3,H3−H4,H3+H4, and direct evaluation gives (λa(hαb))a,b=14=I4, so the displayed λ1,…,λ4 are the fundamental weights.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

The formulas ϵj=(C2j−1−iC2j)/2 and ιj=(C2j−1+iC2j)/2 put all wedge and deletion operators in the image of this representation. The projections Pj=ϵjιj select precisely the basis wedges containing uj, so ∏j∈IPj∏j∉I(I−Pj) projects onto CuI. Composing this projection with deletions for the indices in I and exterior multiplications for the indices in any J gives, up to sign, the matrix unit sending uI to uJ and all other basis vectors to zero. Thus the representation image is all of End⁡C(Δ); both algebras have dimension 256 by [F3], so the representation is an isomorphism. The natural module for End⁡C(Δ) is irreducible: if U⊆Δ is nonzero, then for any u≠0 in U and any z∈Δ there is an endomorphism sending u to z, so invariance forces z∈U.

2.2F1step 1.1algebra

Since C2j−1C2j=i(I−2Pj) and these four even products commute, ω=i4∏j=14(I−2Pj) acts on uI by (−1)∣I∣. There are eight even and eight odd subsets of {1,2,3,4}, hence dim⁡CΔ+=dim⁡CΔ−=8. Each Ca anticommutes with the product of the other seven Clifford generators in ω, so c(v)ω=−ωc(v) for every v∈V; thus c(v) interchanges Δ+ and Δ−.

2.3F1step 1.1algebra

Each C2j−1 has real coefficients and each C2j has purely imaginary coefficients. The four factors of A=C2C4C6C8 anticommute and square to I, so A2=(−1)6I=I and coefficient conjugation gives A‾=A. Conjugation by A fixes the four odd-indexed Ca and negates the four even-indexed ones; coefficient conjugation K has the same respective signs on the Ca. Therefore J=AK is conjugate-linear, J2=AA‾=I, and JCa=CaJ for each a. The volume operator is real and commutes with A, so J preserves Δ+ and Δ−.

2.4F1F2step 1.1algebra

For each i<j, exp⁡(teiej/2)=cos⁡(t/2)+sin⁡(t/2)eiej=ei(cos⁡(t/2)ei+sin⁡(t/2)ej) is a product of two unit vectors in G. Since [eiej,ei]=−2ej and [eiej,ej]=2ei, its vector action is the rotation in the ij-plane; its action on Δ is exp⁡(tCiCj/2). Thus the infinitesimal rotation generators act on Δ by CiCj/2; their commutators, computed from step 1.1, are the standard so(8) brackets. Every element of SO(8) is a product of coordinate-plane rotations: successively rotating its first column to e1 and repeating on the orthogonal complement reduces it to a one-dimensional determinant-+1 block, which is 1. By [F2], any element of Spin(8) differs from a product of the corresponding lifted plane-rotation curves by an element of {1,−1}. Hence invariance under the plane-rotation Lie algebra and this scalar kernel is equivalent to invariance under Spin(8).

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.3step 2.2algebra

The inner product making the ordered wedge basis orthonormal has ϵj∗=ιj, so every Ca is self-adjoint and satisfies Ca2=I. More generally, for a unit vector u=∑auaea with real coefficients, c(u)=∑auaCa is self-adjoint and c(u)2=Q(u)I=I by step 1.1, so every unit-vector generator is unitary and Spin(8) acts unitarily on Δ. The volume eigenspaces are preserved by Spin(8), and J commutes with every c(u) because its coefficients are real and J commutes with each Ca; hence J commutes with the group action. For any z∈Δ±, the vectors (z+Jz)/2 and (z−Jz)/(2i) are J-fixed and z=(z+Jz)/2+i(z−Jz)/(2i); hence the fixed real subspace complexifies to Δ± and has real dimension 8.

3.2F1step 1.3step 2.2step 2.4

Differentiating the spin action of the plane-rotation lifts in step 2.4, the complexified Cartan generator Hj=−iRj acts on Δ by −iC2j−1C2j/2. On uI, this operator has eigenvalue +1/2 when j∉I and −1/2 when j∈I, so the corresponding weight has coordinate +1/2 or −1/2, respectively. Thus Δ+ has the eight half-integral weights with an even number of minus signs, Δ− has the eight with an odd number of minus signs, and VC has weights {±ξj}. Permuting the four coordinate two-planes and reversing an even number of their orientations gives elements of SO(V) inducing the even signed permutations of the ξj; these act transitively on each half-spin parity set and on the vector weights.

4.1F2step 3.1step 3.2algebra

A Spin-invariant complex subspace of any of VC,Δ+,Δ− is invariant under the Lie algebra action by differentiation. The commuting Cartan generators act diagonally in the explicit weight bases of step 3.2; their spectral projections are polynomials in these generators, so the subspace is the sum of its simultaneous weight spaces and a nonzero subspace contains a weight line. The matrices realizing the even signed permutations from step 3.2 lie in SO(V) and by [F2] have Spin(8) lifts. Conjugation by these matrices permutes and changes signs of the Rj, so the lifted group elements carry each Cartan weight space to the space with the corresponding signed-permuted weight. These lifts act transitively on the weight sets in step 3.2. Spin invariance therefore forces the subspace to contain every weight line, so it is the whole module; hence all three complex modules are irreducible. If a real invariant subspace W of 8s or 8c is nonzero, then its complexification is all of Δ+ or Δ−. Since dim⁡CWC=dim⁡RW and dim⁡CΔ±=8, this forces dim⁡RW=8; the full fixed real space has dimension 8 by step 3.1, so W is that full space. For a nonzero real invariant subspace W⊆V, the same argument gives WC=VC and dim⁡RW=dim⁡CVC=8=dim⁡RV, hence W=V.

5.1A1F5F6step 1.3step 3.2step 4.1

Relative to λ4, each weight of Δ+ with two minus signs differs by the positive root ξi+ξj, and the all-minus weight differs by (ξ1+ξ2)+(ξ3+ξ4); hence every weight is below λ4 in the root order. In Δ− the reference sign pattern +++− has weight λ3. Every other odd-minus pattern differs from it in an even number of signs: two flips among the first three give ξi+ξj, a flip at i<4 and at 4 gives ξi−ξ4, and four flips give (ξ1+ξ2)+(ξ3−ξ4), all positive roots or sums of positive roots. Thus every weight is below λ3. The vector weights are {±ξj}; each lies below λ1=ξ1, since the differences are positive roots ξ1−ξj or ξ1+ξj for j>1, or 2ξ1=(ξ1−ξ2)+(ξ1+ξ2) for −ξ1. For M=VC,Δ+,Δ−, take μ=λ1,λ4,λ3, respectively, and 0≠v∈Mμ. For x∈gα, the relation [H,x]=α(H)x gives xv∈Mμ+α; if xv were nonzero for a positive root α, then μ+α would be a weight strictly above the displayed maximal weight μ, by the root-order definition in [F6]; hence every positive-root space annihilates its top weight line. By step 4.1 each module is irreducible, so those vectors generate the corresponding modules and their highest weights are λ1,λ4,λ3 for VC,Δ+,Δ−, respectively.

6.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1∎

The volume operator is the product of the oriented orthonormal Clifford generators; replacing the orientation reverses its sign and exchanges its +1 and −1 eigenspaces. Therefore the labels 8s,8c are exchanged when the chirality convention is reversed, while each fixed real space has dimension eight and is irreducible by steps 3.1 and 4.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources