How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Highest-weight vectors and modules
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra with Cartan subalgebra , a chosen positive system with nilpotent subalgebra (Positive and negative nilpotent subalgebras and the Borel), and let be a representation of . A highest weight vector of is a nonzero vector , for some , with (Weight and weight space); the functional is then called the weight of . A highest weight module of highest weight is a representation generated, as a -module, by a highest weight vector of weight : the smallest subrepresentation of containing is itself.
By Lie representations are U(g)-modules the action of extends uniquely to a unital action of , so the subrepresentation generated by is exactly ; this is the content of the word "generated" above and makes the notion independent of any choice of generators. A highest weight vector satisfies for all by the definition of . The zero representation is not a highest weight module, since a highest weight vector is required to be nonzero.
Depends on
Used by
- A nondominant integral highest-weight module can be infinite-dimensional Counterexample
- Exterior powers and fundamental weights of slₙ Example
- Standard and dual representations of slₙ Example
- Symmetric powers as highest-weight modules Example
- The adjoint representation and highest root Example
- The eight-dimensional adjoint representation of sl3 Example
- Verma modules for sl2 Example
- Finite-dimensionality requires dominance integrality False statement
- Not every weight vector is highest False statement
- Verma modules need not be finite-dimensional False statement
- Every finite-dimensional irreducible module has a highest-weight vector Lemma
- Finite-dimensional highest weights are dominant integral Lemma
- Highest weight modules lie below the top weight Lemma
- Simple-root integrability relations Lemma
- Unique simple quotient of the dominant cyclic module Lemma
- An irreducible module is generated by its highest-weight vector Proposition
- Highest weight of the dual representation Proposition
- The adjoint highest weight is the highest root Proposition
- The highest-weight space is one-dimensional Proposition
- Top summand in a tensor product Proposition
- Dominant simple highest-weight modules are finite-dimensional Theorem
- Highest-weight classification Theorem
- Simple highest-weight modules are classified by highest weight Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander Kirillov Jr., An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)