How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensionality requires dominance integrality
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every functional is the highest weight of a finite-dimensional simple module over the complex semisimple Lie algebra .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, with Cartan subalgebra and simple root , , with coroot (Coroot of a Lie-algebra root, The special linear Lie algebra sl_2), and the functional defined by .
The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it enters through the root-space theory used by [L1] (The Axiom of Choice).
The highest weight of every finite-dimensional irreducible module is dominant integral, that is, for every simple root (Finite-dimensional highest weights are dominant integral, Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights).
For the coroot of the root satisfies , since forces the normalisation with dual to ; hence for the functional of the Given line, . [definition of the coroot]
A finite-dimensional simple highest weight module has a highest weight vector of some weight, and that highest weight is well defined (Highest-weight vectors and modules, Irreducible, completely reducible, and faithful representations).
Refutation
Suppose a finite-dimensional simple -module had highest weight ; then by [L1] the pairing would be a nonnegative integer.
But by [L2] that pairing equals , which is a negative integer, and in particular is not in ; this contradicts step 1.1.
Hence the functional with is not the highest weight of any finite-dimensional simple module, so the universal statement of the Statement section is false; the failed conclusion is the claim that arbitrary functionals occur as highest weights of finite-dimensional simple modules.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)