Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-dimensional highest weights are dominant integral

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let g be a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra with Cartan subalgebra h and a chosen positive system, and let V be a finite-dimensional irreducible representation of g. Then the highest weight of V is dominant integral (Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, such g,h and a chosen base of simple roots α1,,αr with coroots hαi, and a nonzero finite-dimensional irreducible module V.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it enters through the root-space theory supplying [L1] and through [L2] (The Axiom of Choice).

[L1]

For each simple root αi there are eigαi, figαi with [ei,fi]=hαi, [hαi,ei]=2ei and [hαi,fi]=2fi (The root sl_2 triple).

[L2]

V contains a highest weight vector v of some weight λ, and then v generates V; in particular eiv=0 and hαiv=λ(hαi)v (Every finite-dimensional irreducible module has a highest-weight vector, Highest-weight vectors and modules).

[L3]

A finite-dimensional sl2-module is a direct sum of irreducible submodules, and an irreducible submodule has a highest weight m0 with respect to h, with eigenvalues m,m2,,m (Finite-dimensional representations of sl_2).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix a simple root αi, its triple (ei,fi,hαi) from [L1], and a highest weight vector v of weight λ generating V as in [L2]; then eiv=0 and hαiv=miv with mi=λ(hαi).

A1L1L2
2.1

Let W=U(span{ei,fi,hαi})v be the sl2-submodule generated by v; it is a subspace of the finite-dimensional space V, so W is finite dimensional, and by [L3] it is a direct sum of irreducible sl2-submodules.

L1L3step 1.1
3.1

Write the direct-sum decomposition from step 2.1 as W=a=1sWa and decompose v=ava accordingly. Each Wa is stable under ei and hαi, so uniqueness of the direct sum and step 1.1 give eiva=0 and hαiva=miva for every a. Since v0, some component va is nonzero. That component is a highest weight vector of the irreducible module Wa with highest weight mi, so [L3] implies miZ0.

L3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

The argument of steps 1.1–3.1 applies to every simple root, so λ,αi=miZ0 for every i, which by definition means that the highest weight λ is dominant integral.

step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources