How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional highest weights are dominant integral
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra with Cartan subalgebra and a chosen positive system, and let be a finite-dimensional irreducible representation of . Then the highest weight of is dominant integral (Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, such and a chosen base of simple roots with coroots , and a nonzero finite-dimensional irreducible module .
The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it enters through the root-space theory supplying [L1] and through [L2] (The Axiom of Choice).
For each simple root there are , with , and (The root sl_2 triple).
contains a highest weight vector of some weight , and then generates ; in particular and (Every finite-dimensional irreducible module has a highest-weight vector, Highest-weight vectors and modules).
A finite-dimensional -module is a direct sum of irreducible submodules, and an irreducible submodule has a highest weight with respect to , with eigenvalues (Finite-dimensional representations of sl_2).
Proof
Fix a simple root , its triple from [L1], and a highest weight vector of weight generating as in [L2]; then and with .
Let be the -submodule generated by ; it is a subspace of the finite-dimensional space , so is finite dimensional, and by [L3] it is a direct sum of irreducible -submodules.
Write the direct-sum decomposition from step 2.1 as and decompose accordingly. Each is stable under and , so uniqueness of the direct sum and step 1.1 give and for every . Since , some component is nonzero. That component is a highest weight vector of the irreducible module with highest weight , so [L3] implies .
The argument of steps 1.1–3.1 applies to every simple root, so for every , which by definition means that the highest weight is dominant integral.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kirillov Jr., An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)