How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simple-root integrability relations
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra with Cartan subalgebra and a chosen positive system with simple roots , let be dominant integral with (Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights), and let be a finite-dimensional highest weight module of highest weight with highest weight vector (Highest-weight vectors and modules). For every simple root and a lowering vector with for a suitable (The root sl_2 triple),
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, such , a dominant integral with , a finite-dimensional highest weight module of highest weight , and for each a pair , forming, together with , a copy of .
The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it enters through the root-space theory supplying [L1] and through [L3] (The Axiom of Choice).
For every , , and (The root sl_2 triple).
is killed by and satisfies (Highest-weight vectors and modules, Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights).
A finite-dimensional -module is a direct sum of irreducibles, and an irreducible submodule with highest weight has dimension and weights (Finite-dimensional representations of sl_2).
Proof
Fix and consider , the -submodule of generated by ; it is finite dimensional because is, and while by [L1] and [L2].
By [L3] write as a direct sum of irreducible -submodules, and write with . Because every is stable under and , uniqueness of the direct sum and step 1.1 give and for every .
For every with , step 2.1 makes a highest weight vector of the irreducible module with highest weight . By [L3], ; the same equality is trivial when . Summing over gives in .
Since , the vanishing of step 3.1 holds in ; as was arbitrary, for every simple root, which is the assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kirillov Jr., An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)