Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First variation of the scalar-field action and the Euler-Lagrange equation

Statement

Let Ω⊆A be a nonempty open set with an inertial chart x, let c,K>0 be numerical constants, let V:R→R be smooth and let φ:Ω→R be a smooth real scalar field (C^k tensor fields on affine Minkowski space and their inertial components). For every smooth compactly supported h:Ω→R define the first variation δS(φ)[h]:=−Kc∫Ω(ηab∂aφ ∂bh+V′(φ)h) d4x, a finite Riemann integral by compact support of h (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(c)). Then (a) δS(φ)[h]=Kc∫Ω(□φ−V′(φ))h d4x, where □φ:=ηab∂a∂bφ; (b) δS(φ)[h]=0 for every such h if and only if □φ=V′(φ) on Ω. The equation in (b) is called the scalar-field equation of this model. The statement is the first variation of the action on compactly supported variations; it asserts nothing about convergence of S on unbounded domains, no boundary term, no dynamics beyond the equivalence in (b) and no empirical fact. No choice principle is used. Precisely, with L(ϕ):=12ηab∂aϕ∂bϕ+V(ϕ), define the relative action Sh(s):=−(K/c)∫Ω[L(φ+sh)−L(φ)] d4x. Its integrand has support in supp⁡h, so it is defined for every real s even when either background action diverges; Sh′(0)=δS(φ)[h].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The affine Minkowski model (A,V,η,C+) with a fixed inertial chart x and its coordinate partial derivatives ∂a (Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives), Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn), a nonempty open Ω⊆A, numerical constants c,K>0, a smooth V:R→R, a smooth real scalar field φ:Ω→R (C^k tensor fields on affine Minkowski space and their inertial components), and smooth compactly supported real h:Ω→R. In the inertial chart the metric components are the constant matrices ηab=ηab=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), with ηab=ηba (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model). We write □φ:=ηab∂a∂bφ and L(ϕ):=12ηab∂aϕ∂bϕ+V(ϕ) for a smooth scalar function ϕ.

[F1]

Compactly supported differentiation under the integral sign: if F:(−s0,s0)×Ω→R is continuous with continuous ∂sF and there is a compact K⋐Ω with F(s,z)=0 for z∉K and all s, then s↦∫ΩF(s,z) d4z is C1 on (−s0,s0) with derivative ∫Ω∂sF(s,z) d4z. (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(c))

[F2]

Compact-support integration by parts: if f:Ω→R is C1 and compactly supported and g:Ω→R is C1, then for each a, ∫Ω(∂af)g d4x=−∫Ωf(∂ag) d4x. (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(b))

[F3]

Fundamental lemma: if g:Ω→R is continuous and ∫Ωgψ d4x=0 for every smooth compactly supported ψ:Ω→R, then g=0 on Ω. (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(a))

[F4]

Chain rule for total derivatives: if f is totally differentiable at a and g at f(a), then D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a). (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a))

[F6]

If a map is totally differentiable at a point, then all its directional derivatives exist there and equal the total derivative evaluated on the direction; in particular coordinate partial derivatives are the entries of the Jacobian. (A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian)

[F7]

Sums, scalar multiples and products of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined, so every finite polynomial expression in continuous real-valued maps is continuous; a composite of continuous maps is continuous, and pulling a continuous real-valued function back along the coordinate projection (s,z)↦z preserves continuity, both immediately from the definition of continuity through preimages of open sets and from the descriptions of the product and subspace topologies. Consequently the maps (s,z)↦∂aφ(z), (s,z)↦∂ah(z), (s,z)↦h(z), (s,z)↦s, (s,z)↦φ(z)+s h(z) and the composites V(φ(z)+sh(z)) and V′(φ(z)+sh(z)) are continuous on R×Ω. (Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and f(A‾)⊆f(A)‾)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF4F5F6F7

Fix a smooth compactly supported h. For every real s and every z∈Ω set Φs(z):=L(φ+sh)(z)−L(φ)(z) and F(s,z):=−(K/c)Φs(z). Differentiating the real function s↦L(φ+sh)(z) with the sum, scalar-multiple and product rules [F5], the chain rule [F4] and the Jacobian identification [F6] gives ∂sΦs(z)=ηab∂a(φ+sh)(z) ∂bh(z)+V′(φ(z)+sh(z)) h(z), and the right-hand side equals ηab∂aφ(z)∂bh(z)+V′(φ(z))h(z) at s=0. Both Φs and ∂sΦs are continuous on R×Ω: each is a finite sum of products of the continuous maps (s,z)↦∂aφ(z), (s,z)↦∂ah(z), (s,z)↦h(z), (s,z)↦s, (s,z)↦φ(z)+sh(z) and of the composites of the last of these with the continuous one-variable functions V and V′, and [F7] gives continuity of all these sums, products and composites; both functions also vanish at every z∉supp⁡h, because φ+sh=φ there.

2.1F1step 1.1

Apply [F1] to F on (−1,1)×Ω: the relative action Sh(s)=−(K/c)∫ΩΦs d4x is C1 on (−1,1) with Sh′(0)=−(K/c)∫Ω∂sΦ0 d4x=δS(φ)[h], using the value of ∂sΦs at s=0 from step 1.1; the integrand of Sh(s) is supported in supp⁡h for every s, so Sh(s) is a finite Riemann integral for every real s and Sh′(0)=δS(φ)[h].

3.1F2step 2.1given

Claim (a): [F2] with f=h and g=ηab∂bφ (here ηab is constant in the inertial chart) gives ∫Ωηab∂aφ ∂bh d4x=−∫Ωh ηab∂a∂bφ d4x=−∫Ω(□φ)h d4x. Substituting into the definition of δS(φ)[h] from step 2.1 yields δS(φ)[h]=Kc∫Ω(□φ−V′(φ))h d4x.

4.1F3step 3.1

Claim (b), forward direction: assume δS(φ)[h]=0 for every smooth compactly supported h. By step 3.1 the continuous function g:=Kc(□φ−V′(φ)) satisfies ∫Ωgψ d4x=0 for every smooth compactly supported ψ; [F3] gives g=0, i.e. □φ=V′(φ) on Ω.

4.2step 3.1

Claim (b), reverse direction: if □φ=V′(φ) on Ω, then for every smooth compactly supported h step 3.1 gives δS(φ)[h]=Kc∫Ω(□φ−V′(φ))h d4x=0, because the integrand is the zero function.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2∎

Step 3.1 proves (a), steps 4.1 and 4.2 prove the two directions of (b), and step 2.1 identifies the first variation as the derivative of the relative action at 0. No background action on Ω need converge, no boundary term and no choice principle is used; the displayed equation is an equivalence on Ω and asserts no dynamics.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources