How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First variation of the scalar-field action and the Euler-Lagrange equation
Statement
Let be a nonempty open set with an inertial chart , let be numerical constants, let be smooth and let be a smooth real scalar field (C^k tensor fields on affine Minkowski space and their inertial components). For every smooth compactly supported define the first variation a finite Riemann integral by compact support of (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(c)). Then (a) , where ; (b) for every such if and only if on . The equation in (b) is called the scalar-field equation of this model. The statement is the first variation of the action on compactly supported variations; it asserts nothing about convergence of on unbounded domains, no boundary term, no dynamics beyond the equivalence in (b) and no empirical fact. No choice principle is used. Precisely, with , define the relative action . Its integrand has support in , so it is defined for every real even when either background action diverges; .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The affine Minkowski model with a fixed inertial chart and its coordinate partial derivatives (Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives), Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map ), a nonempty open , numerical constants , a smooth , a smooth real scalar field (C^k tensor fields on affine Minkowski space and their inertial components), and smooth compactly supported real . In the inertial chart the metric components are the constant matrices , with (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model). We write and for a smooth scalar function .
Compactly supported differentiation under the integral sign: if is continuous with continuous and there is a compact with for and all , then is on with derivative . (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(c))
Compact-support integration by parts: if is and compactly supported and is , then for each , . (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(b))
Fundamental lemma: if is continuous and for every smooth compactly supported , then on . (Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign,(a))
Chain rule for total derivatives: if is totally differentiable at and at , then . (The chain rule for total derivatives: )
Real one-variable sum, scalar multiple and product rules for derivatives. (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when )
If a map is totally differentiable at a point, then all its directional derivatives exist there and equal the total derivative evaluated on the direction; in particular coordinate partial derivatives are the entries of the Jacobian. (A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian)
Sums, scalar multiples and products of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined, so every finite polynomial expression in continuous real-valued maps is continuous; a composite of continuous maps is continuous, and pulling a continuous real-valued function back along the coordinate projection preserves continuity, both immediately from the definition of continuity through preimages of open sets and from the descriptions of the product and subspace topologies. Consequently the maps , , , , and the composites and are continuous on . (Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and )
Proof
Fix a smooth compactly supported . For every real and every set and . Differentiating the real function with the sum, scalar-multiple and product rules [F5], the chain rule [F4] and the Jacobian identification [F6] gives and the right-hand side equals at . Both and are continuous on : each is a finite sum of products of the continuous maps , , , , and of the composites of the last of these with the continuous one-variable functions and , and [F7] gives continuity of all these sums, products and composites; both functions also vanish at every , because there.
Apply [F1] to on : the relative action is on with , using the value of at from step 1.1; the integrand of is supported in for every , so is a finite Riemann integral for every real and .
Claim (a): [F2] with and (here is constant in the inertial chart) gives . Substituting into the definition of from step 2.1 yields .
Claim (b), forward direction: assume for every smooth compactly supported . By step 3.1 the continuous function satisfies for every smooth compactly supported ; [F3] gives , i.e. on .
Claim (b), reverse direction: if on , then for every smooth compactly supported step 3.1 gives , because the integrand is the zero function.
Step 3.1 proves (a), steps 4.1 and 4.2 prove the two directions of (b), and step 2.1 identifies the first variation as the derivative of the relative action at . No background action on need converge, no boundary term and no choice principle is used; the displayed equation is an equivalence on and asserts no dynamics.
Depends on
Compact-support variation: the fundamental lemma, integration by parts and differentiation under the integral sign
C^k tensor fields on affine Minkowski space and their inertial components
Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives)
Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space
Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map
Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model
A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian
The chain rule for total derivatives:
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined
Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- D. Tong, General Relativity, University of Cambridge Part III Mathematical Tripos (Michaelmas Term 2019); c = 1 formulas converted to x^0 = c t; 4.5.1-4.5.5 printed pp. 181-191: scalar-field action (4.42)-(4.43) and equation of motion, Hilbert energy-momentum tensor (4.46), diffeomorphism invariance and conservation (4.50), flat-space Noether form, scalar tensor (4.51), Maxwell tensor (4.52), perfect fluid (4.53) with conservation equations (4.54)-(4.55), and the flat-space conserved-charge box argument of 4.5.5
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), Chapter 1 printed pp. 28-30 (energy-momentum tensor, dust T^{mu nu}=rho U^mu U^nu (1.106), perfect fluid (1.107)-(1.110), scalar and Maxwell tensors (1.111)-(1.112), conservation (1.113) with the remark that the proof follows from each matter model's equations of motion) and Chapter 5 printed pp. 138-139 (on-shell conservation from diffeomorphism invariance with compact-support variations, (5.34)-(5.38))