Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mean-zero Poincare inequality on a rectangle

Statement

Let d≥1, let L1,…,Ld>0, and let Ω=∏i=1d(0,Li). If w∈C1(Ω‾,R) satisfies ∫Ωw(x) dx=0, write ∇w=(∂1w,…,∂dw) and ∣∇w∣2=∑i=1d∣∂iw∣2. Then ∫Ω∣w(x)∣2 dx≤d2∑i=1dLi2∫Ω∣∂iw(x)∣2 dx≤CΩ∫Ω∣∇w(x)∣2 dx, where CΩ=d2max⁡iLi2. All integrals are the multidimensional Riemann integrals of continuous functions on the indicated closed rectangles, with the usual extension to their interiors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A dimension d≥1, positive side lengths Li, the open rectangle Ω=∏i(0,Li), and w∈C1(Ω‾,R) with ∫Ωw=0.

[A1]

The zero-mean condition is ∫Ωw(x) dx=0.

[F1]

Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: if G is continuous on [a,b], differentiable on (a,b), and its interior derivative has a Riemann-integrable extension f, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a).

[F2]

Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections: when every section of a Riemann-integrable function on a product of nondegenerate closed rectangles is integrable, the ordinary iterated integral equals the multiple integral. In particular, this applies to the continuous integrands used here.

Proof

1.1A1F2algebra

Expand the square in the product integral and use [A1]: ∫Ω∫Ω(w(x)−w(y))2 dy dx=2∣Ω∣∫Ωw2−2(∫Ωw)2=2∣Ω∣∫Ωw2. The integrand is continuous, so [F2] justifies the repeated integrals.

1.2givenalgebra

For x,y∈Ω, define z(0)=x and z(i)=(y1,…,yi,xi+1,…,xd) for 1≤i≤d, and set δi=w(z(i−1))−w(z(i)). Then w(x)−w(y)=∑iδi and d∑iδi2−(∑iδi)2=∑i<j(δi−δj)2≥0.

1.3F1algebra

Fix i and the other coordinates. By [F1], δi is the integral of h=∂iw over the interval between xi and yi. If the endpoints differ, let hˉ be the average of h on that interval. Nonnegativity of ∫(h−hˉ)2 gives (∫h)2≤∣xi−yi∣∫h2; if they agree, δi=0. Since ∣xi−yi∣≤Li, in both cases δi2≤Li∫0Li∣∂iw(z1,…,zi−1,s,zi+1,…,zd)∣2 ds.

2.1F2step 1.3algebra

Integrate the last bound over x,y. The xi,yi integrations contribute Li2, the displayed segment bound contributes Li, each unused variable from a pair xj,yj with j≠i contributes Lj, and the remaining variables and s give ∫Ω∣∂iw∣2. By [F2], this yields ∫Ω∫Ωδi2 dy dx≤∣Ω∣Li2∫Ω∣∂iw∣2.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

By step 1.2 and the finite squared-sum inequality, the double integral in step 1.1 is at most d∑i∫Ω∫Ωδi2 dy dx. Apply step 2.1, divide by 2∣Ω∣>0, and use ∑iLi2∣∂iw∣2≤(max⁡iLi2)∣∇w∣2 pointwise. This gives both stated inequalities with the displayed CΩ.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources