Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Single-mode Bose and Fermi occupation fluctuations

Statement

For q∈(0,1), the bosonic geometric law on n∈N0 with weights (1−q)qn has mean q/(1−q) and variance q/(1−q)2=E[n](1+E[n]); its relative standard deviation, defined as Var⁡(n)/E[n], tends to 1 as q↑1. The fermionic two-state law on n∈{0,1} with weights 1/(1+q) and q/(1+q) has mean q/(1+q) and variance q/(1+q)2=E[n](1−E[n]). Here Bose and Fermi name these explicitly specified counting laws; no claim about a physical preparation is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The geometric and two-state laws with q∈(0,1).

[A1]

The bosonic states are N0 with weights proportional to qn; the fermionic states are {0,1} with weights proportional to qn.

[F1]

Countable canonical model and Summable canonical differentiation: countable canonical weights normalize when the partition sum is finite, and under the envelope the mean and variance follow from derivatives of Z.

[F5]

The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞: nke−bn→0 for each fixed integer k and b>0.

Proof

Given: The geometric and two-state laws with q∈(0,1).

1.1A1F1F3F5algebra

Let SN=∑n=0Nqn. Multiplying this finite sum by 1−q gives (1−q)SN=1−qN+1. Since q=e−γ for γ>0, [F5] gives qN+1→0; hence Z=(1−q)−1 and the weights (1−q)qn sum to one. On a compact γ-interval [b,B]⊂(0,∞), set an=(1+n2)e−bn. Then an+1/an=e−b(1+(n+1)2)/(1+n2)→e−b<1. Choose c with e−b<c<1; for all sufficiently large n, an+1≤can, so the tail is bounded by a convergent geometric series. Thus ∑n(1+n2)e−γn≤∑nan<∞, which is the local envelope required by [F1].

1.2A1F2F3

The fermionic partition sum is 1+q; its two probabilities are 1/(1+q) and q/(1+q). Their finite weighted sums give mean q/(1+q) and variance q/(1+q)2, equal to the mean times one minus the mean.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1

With Z(γ)=(1−e−γ)−1, [F1] gives En=−∂γlog⁡Z=q/(1−q) and Var⁡(n)=∂γ2log⁡Z=q/(1−q)2. Substitution q=e−γ and [F4] justify the parameter derivatives. Therefore Var⁡(n)/En=1/q→1 as q↑1.

3.1A1step 2.1step 1.2∎

These are calculations for the two specified probability laws only; no independence, physical preparation, or measured fluctuation claim is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources