How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gauge-compensated charged Killing energy
Statement
Use the Lorentzian geometry, units, charge sign, potential , field , compensator , and charged trajectory of Charged particle and Liouville data on a stationary Lorentzian domain. Assume the global potential symmetry . Define Then , and is constant along every interval on which the trajectory obeys the stated Lorentz equation. It is invariant under , . Replacing the potential reference by changes by .
This is a conditional mathematical statement about curves satisfying the displayed equation. It asserts neither existence of such curves for arbitrary initial data nor that the model describes nature.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A connected domain , a smooth future timelike Killing field , a global smooth real one-form with , a smooth scalar with , and a future unit trajectory with , , satisfying .
Charged particle and Liouville data on a stationary Lorentzian domain: with , , , , , and .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. This inherited assumption is part of the actual draft stationary thermal geometry carrier; the trajectory calculation invokes no stronger choice principle.
A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant: a real function continuous on an interval and differentiable at each interior point, with zero derivative at each such point, is constant on the interval.
The stationary field satisfies the Killing equation , and the Lorentz force equation is .
Proof
In any coordinate chart, and . Adding these identities gives . Using and [F1], this yields .
Metric compatibility and yield The middle Killing term vanishes because is symmetric and ; the force contraction has the displayed sign since .
Since and , The curve is and the fields are smooth, so is and hence continuous on . Its derivative is zero by step 2.1; since the open interval is order-convex, [F3] makes constant there.
Under , because the coordinate mixed partials of the smooth scalar commute. Also , so satisfies . Since , and . Replacing by leaves fixed and sends to , so changes by .
Remarks
For a global grand-canonical multiplier , the reference shift is accompanied by ; hence is reference independent. The source treatments are context only: the proof above fixes its own Lorentz-force and potential conventions and does not assume a fluid model.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- David Tong, General Relativity lecture notes, §4.3.2, Killing fields and conserved particle quantities
- Igor Bogush, Kirill Kobialko and Dmitri Gal’tsov, Constructing massive particles surfaces in static spacetimes, arXiv:2402.03266v1, §II
- Kai Shi, Yu Tian, Xiaoning Wu, Hongbao Zhang and Chuanjia Zhu, Thermodynamic equilibrium condition and the first law of thermodynamics for charged perfect fluids in electromagnetic and gravitational fields, §§2–3