Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gauge-compensated charged Killing energy

Statement

Use the Lorentzian geometry, units, charge sign, potential A, field F=dA, compensator Λξ, and C2 charged trajectory x(sm) of Charged particle and Liouville data on a stationary Lorentzian domain. Assume the global potential symmetry LξA=dΛξ. Define Hξ:=−g(P,ξ)+qΦξ=−g(P,ξ)−cqΨξ. Then ιξF=−dΨξ, and Hξ is constant along every interval on which the trajectory obeys the stated Lorentz equation. It is invariant under A↦A+dχ, Λξ↦Λξ+ξ(χ). Replacing the potential reference by Φξ+C0 changes Hξ by qC0.

This is a conditional mathematical statement about curves satisfying the displayed equation. It asserts neither existence of such curves for arbitrary initial data nor that the model describes nature.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A connected domain O, a smooth future timelike Killing field ξ, a global smooth real one-form A with F=dA, a smooth scalar Λξ with LξA=dΛξ, and a C2 future unit trajectory x(sm) with P=Mw, M=mc2>0, satisfying ∇wPa=cqFabwb.

[F1]

Charged particle and Liouville data on a stationary Lorentzian domain: P=Mw with g(w,w)=−1, Fab=∂aAb−∂bAa, (LξA)a=ξb∂bAa+Ab∂aξb, (ιξF)a=ξbFba, Ψξ=ξaAa−Λξ, and Φξ=−cΨξ.

[F2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. This inherited assumption is part of the actual draft stationary thermal geometry carrier; the trajectory calculation invokes no stronger choice principle.

[F3]

A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant: a real function continuous on an interval and differentiable at each interior point, with zero derivative at each such point, is constant on the interval.

[A1]

The stationary field satisfies the Killing equation ∇(aξb)=0, and the Lorentz force equation is ∇wPa=cqFabwb.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

In any coordinate chart, (ιξF)a=ξb(∂bAa−∂aAb) and d(ιξA)a=∂a(ξbAb). Adding these identities gives (ιξF)a+d(ιξA)a=ξb∂bAa+Ab∂aξb=(LξA)a. Using LξA=dΛξ and [F1], this yields ιξF=dΛξ−d(ιξA)=−dΨξ.

2.1givenF1F2A1step 1.1algebra

Metric compatibility and P=Mw yield ddsmg(P,ξ)=cq g(F♯(w),ξ)+Mwawb∇bξa=cq (ιξF)(w)=−cq w(Ψξ). The middle Killing term vanishes because wawb is symmetric and ∇(aξb)=0; the force contraction has the displayed sign since g(F♯(w),ξ)=ξcFcbwb.

3.1givenF3step 2.1algebra

Since dΨξ/dsm=w(Ψξ) and qΦξ=−cqΨξ, dHξdsm=−ddsmg(P,ξ)−cq w(Ψξ)=0. The curve is C2 and the fields are smooth, so Hξ is C1 and hence continuous on J. Its derivative is zero by step 2.1; since the open interval J is order-convex, [F3] makes Hξ constant there.

4.1givenF1algebra∎

Under A′=A+dχ, dA′=F because the coordinate mixed partials of the smooth scalar χ commute. Also (Lξdχ)a=ξb∂b∂aχ+(∂aξb)∂bχ=∂a(ξb∂bχ), so Λξ′:=Λξ+ξ(χ) satisfies LξA′=dΛξ′. Since (ιξdχ)=ξ(χ), Ψξ′=Ψξ and Hξ′=Hξ. Replacing Λξ by Λξ+C0/c leaves dΛξ fixed and sends Φξ to Φξ+C0, so Hξ changes by qC0.

Remarks

For a global grand-canonical multiplier μK, the reference shift Φξ↦Φξ+C0 is accompanied by μK↦μK+qC0; hence Hξ−μK is reference independent. The source treatments are context only: the proof above fixes its own Lorentz-force and potential conventions and does not assume a fluid model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources