Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normal slice charge equals its coordinate density integral

Statement

Assume the ACω convention and the spacelike slab data of Finite spacelike slab and normal flux charge. For every slice Σt and every C1 current J in that definition, its normal flux charge is QJ(t)=∫ΩwJ0 d3x, where w=∣det⁡(gab)∣ is the metric density in the supplied chart.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The coordinate box K, positive-definite spatial block hij, g00<0, scalar α=(−g00)−1/2, future unit normal na=−αδa0, and charge QJ(t)=∫Ω−g(J,n)det⁡h d3x.

[A1]

The smooth Lorentzian geometry uses the ACω convention recorded in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) and Finite spacelike slab and normal flux charge.

[F1]

The supplied definition gives h=(gij) positive definite, g00<0, na=−αδa0 and the normal-flux definition of QJ(t) (Finite spacelike slab and normal flux charge).

Proof

technique · direct block determinant and inverse-matrix calculation
1.1A1F1algebra

In the coordinate basis write the metric matrix as G=(g00bTbh), where bi=gi0. Since h is positive definite it is invertible. Subtract bTh−1 times the lower block rows from the first row; this determinant-preserving operation gives det⁡G=det⁡(h) S,S:=g00−bTh−1b. To identify the inverse entry, solve Gz=e0: the lower equations give zsp=−h−1bz0, and the first equation then gives Sz0=1. Therefore g00=z0=S−1, so S<0 by [F1].

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

From S=(g00)−1<0 and the definition of α, α=−S. As det⁡h>0, step 1.1 yields w=∣det⁡G∣=det⁡h−S=αdet⁡h.

3.1step 2.1F1algebra∎

Lowering the index of n gives na=−αδa0 by [F1], hence −g(J,n)=−Jana=αJ0. Substitute step 2.1 into the defining integrand of QJ(t) to obtain −g(J,n)det⁡h=αJ0det⁡h=wJ0. Integrating over Ω proves the statement.

Remarks

The calculation is restricted to the supplied spacelike coordinate slices. It makes no assertion that the coordinate component J0 alone is invariant or that charges from different slicings agree.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources