How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The filtered differential induces d r on the r page
Statement
For each , the filtered differential induces a morphism characterized on local representatives by , where .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A filtered complex, , and ; symbols have [F1] conventions.
is the quotient of the specified numerator by its two denominator summands (R page of the spectral sequence of a filtered complex).
The associated graded differential is well defined (The associated graded of a filtered complex is a bigraded complex).
Maps preserving numerator and denominator descend uniquely; image representatives can be lifted after epic pullback (Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus).
Proof
For r=0 use [F2]. For r≥1, the restriction of d to lands in . Its next differential is zero, so it lands in , the target numerator in [F1].
If changes by , then lies in the target boundary summand . If x changes by with , its differential changes by . These are subobject factorization calculations: the sum epimorphism allows their verification after an epic cover by [F3].
Consequently the map from the source numerator to the target quotient kills both denominator summands and hence their sum. Cokernel descent [F3] gives a unique satisfying the stated rule. Equality after the epic source quotient proves that the rule is independent of every permitted local representative.
Source notes
Weibel, Chapter 5, Construction 5.4.6 and Lemma 5.4.7, pp.133–134; Sharifi, Theorem 4.2.3, pp.91–92. Increasing homological indices are used here.