How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Separately adopted fixed-background Maxwell and charged probes
A separately adopted classical test model on a prescribed smooth Lorentzian metric: smooth source-free or prescribed-source Maxwell fields and massive charged probes on finite local-potential worldline segments. The metric and field are fixed inputs; no Einstein equation is imposed on them, no probe self-field or self-gravity is evaluated, and no small-backreaction limit, global potential, global trajectory, or empirical validity is asserted. Geometric-optics use is limited to the exact finite-order phase, amplitude, constraint, and compact-region bounds in the listed mathematical supplier.
Postulate
On an open region of the oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian spacetime and length-coordinate SI conventions of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables, adopt a prescribed-background Maxwell model. The metric is fixed input. Choose a real electromagnetic two-form and either adopt the source-free equations and , or supply a current and adopt and , with the exact signs and units of that definition. The source current is prescribed independently of the probe; this postulate does not impose an Einstein equation, matter evolution equation, or field equation for the sources on the unchanged metric.
For a massive charged probe, use the adopted local action and finite-curve conditions of External-field charged-particle action: and are constant, the path is a future-directed timelike segment parameterized by proper time, and its endpoints are fixed in variations supported in a local potential domain with a supplied one-form satisfying . The potential and metric are external data independent of the path. Under the exact hypotheses of Stationary charged action and Lorentz force, action stationarity is equivalent to ; that theorem's assumption is inherited only when this equivalent force-law formulation is used. No global potential or trajectory is included.
The probe's own singular field and self-gravity are excluded. No radiation reaction, variable mass or charge, finite-body model, or backreaction estimate is adopted. In particular, calling or a test background records this model's omission of their response; it does not claim that the unchanged pair solves the coupled Einstein–Maxwell equations or is close to a coupled solution.
When geometric optics is invoked, it is restricted to the exact real phase, complex amplitudes, four pointwise ansatz constraints, and fixed compact-chart coefficient bounds of Finite WKB Maxwell residual, null rays and polarization quotient. That result supplies finite residual and leading-field estimates, local null rays, and a polarization quotient; it supplies no convergent series, global transport through caustics, exact-solution error estimate, or backreaction theorem.
This is a separately adopted physical model with no empirical premise. The Maxwell and probe assumptions are not deductions from one another, from mathematical axioms, or from source authority.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- H. S. Reall, General Relativity, Cambridge Part III lecture notes, 12 October 2022 revision, complete 125-page notes, §6.2
- Eric Poisson, Adam Pound and Ian Vega, The Motion of Point Particles in Curved Spacetime, author manuscript arXiv:1102.0529v3 (2011), complete 162-page review
- David Tong, General Relativity, complete author-hosted 290-page lecture notes (2019)
- A. I. Harte, Gravitational lensing beyond geometric optics: I. Formalism and observables, arXiv:1808.06203v2 (2018), complete 38-page article