Alphabeta Math
PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Selected finite bath and effective energy-exchange preparation

Physical scope

A selected finite Gibbs-volume Kepler subsystem with negative capacity, a finite logarithmic-entropy bath with positive constant capacity, conserved total energy, a matched-temperature point, and the separately adopted scalar exchange ODE, with the upstream slow-motion bound retained for any Newtonian physical-applicability claim; not causal relativistic transport, generic stellar stability, empirical thermalization, or an observed reservoir.

Postulate

Use the finite relative Kepler subsystem and Gibbs-volume entropy convention of Confined relative Kepler shell and volume entropy preparation, with R>16r0. In that model, choose EG=−e∗ with A/R<e∗<A/(16r0), strictly inside the energy branch, and restrict to an open interval IG about x∗=EG whose energies stay in that interior. The supplied formula Ω(−e)=Ce−3/2J(er0/A) has J(δ)=∫δ1s1/2(1−s)3/2ds and J′(δ)=−δ1/2(1−δ)3/2; because δ stays in (0,1/16), this derivative is smooth there, so J, Ω, and SG=kBlog⁡Ω are C2 on IG. The mathematical result Negative Gibbs-volume capacity in a finite regulated shell gives TG(x∗)=T∗>0 and finite CG(x∗)<0 on this branch; restrict IG if necessary so these strict signs persist. For a physical Newtonian slow-motion interpretation, also retain the upstream condition 2A/(μr0c2)≤δNR≪1 for a stated tolerance δNR; the scalar exchange calculation itself uses only the explicitly adopted model.

As a separate finite bath, choose Cb>0 in J K−1, reference energy E0 in joules, reference temperature Tref>0 in kelvins, and entropy constant S0 in J K−1. For bath energy Eb>E0, adopt Sb(Eb)=Cblog⁡ ⁣(Eb−E0CbTref)+S0. The logarithm argument is dimensionless, and this stipulated bath has Tb=(dSb/dEb)−1=(Eb−E0)/Cb and constant heat capacity Cb. Fix total energy Etot=x+Eb, choose Eb=E0+CbT∗ to match the selected subsystem temperature, and restrict 0<Cb<∣CG(x∗)∣.

Finally adopt the effective scalar energy-exchange law x˙=L ddx[SG(x)+Sb(Etot−x)],L>0 J K s−1. The law is a selected one-dimensional model with time measured in seconds; it does not assert a relativistic transport equation or a mechanism for thermalization. The literature citations give gravitational-thermodynamic context only; the explicit bath and ODE are adopted here, and their mathematical consequences are proved conditionally by the linked local supplier.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources