Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite positive multicenter MP exterior and fluxes

Statement

Let N≥1 be an integer, let a1,…,aN∈R3 be distinct, let mA>0 have length units, and let σ∈{−1,+1}. On D=R3∖{a1,…,aN} define

H(x)=1+∑A=1NmA∣x−aA∣.

Then H is smooth, positive and Euclidean harmonic on D, so Positive harmonic conformastatic electrovac data and Full harmonic Majumdar-Papapetrou Einstein-Maxwell verification give a smooth source-free geometric electrovac datum on Rx0×D. For any fixed s∈Rx0 and any outward-oriented Euclidean sphere S⊂D, use the inclusion is,S:S→Rx0×D, is,S(x)=(s,x), and give its image the transported sphere orientation. In the flux notation below, qe(S) and qm(S) mean the fluxes through is,S(S), equivalently (4π)−1∫Sis,S∗(⋆gFσ) and (4π)−1∫Sis,S∗Fσ; the values are independent of s. For each A and r>0, every coordinate sphere SA(r)={x:∣x−aA∣=r} whose closed ball contains no other center has electric flux qe(SA(r))=σmA and magnetic flux qm(SA(r))=0. If a coordinate sphere with R>0, SR={x:∣x∣=R} strictly encloses all centers, its fluxes are qe(SR)=σ∑AmA and qm(SR)=0. No center is included in the manifold; these are fluxes through regular spheres, not matter-source, horizon-extension, stability, or completeness claims.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Euclidean coordinate domain, finitely many distinct centers, positive length parameters, and the data definitions and flux conventions below.

[F1]

Positive harmonic conformastatic electrovac data defines the metric, global potential, field Fσ, orientation, and units for any smooth positive harmonic H.

[F2]

Full harmonic Majumdar-Papapetrou Einstein-Maxwell verification proves that these data satisfy dFσ=d(⋆gFσ)=0 and Ric⁡=2Q(Fσ).

[F3]

Geometric electrovac equations and flux normalization defines qe(S)=(4π)−1∫S⋆gF and qm(S)=(4π)−1∫SF for oriented embedded spheres.

[F4]

Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star gives (⋆gF)ab=12(volg)abcdFcd in a positively oriented chart.

[A1]

All radii r,R used below are positive, and every coordinate sphere is oriented by the outward Euclidean orientation from its bounded ball. The centers are distinct, mA>0, every isolated sphere has a closed ball containing no other center, and every outer sphere considered strictly encloses all centers.

Proof

1.1givenA1algebra

For z≠0, direct differentiation gives ∂i∣z∣−1=−zi∣z∣−3 and ∂i2∣z∣−1=−∣z∣−3+3zi2∣z∣−5. Summing over i yields Δδ∣z∣−1=−3∣z∣−3+3∣z∣2∣z∣−5=0. Every term in H is smooth on D, and every term is positive there, so H>0 and ΔδH=0 on D.

1.2givenF1F3F4algebra

Inverting the diagonal metric in [F1] gives g00=−H2 and gij=H−2δij, so raising Fi0=−σHi/H2 gives Fi0=σHi/H2. The metric determinant is (−H−2)(H2)3=−H4, so the oriented volume form is volg=H2dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3. The Hodge formula [F4], with ϵ123=1 and ϵijk alternating, therefore gives (⋆gFσ)ij=−σϵijkHk. For each sphere S⊂D and fixed s, the map is,S in the Statement is smooth and injective, its differential is v↦(0,v) of rank two, and projection onto D restricts to its continuous inverse on its image. Thus it is a smooth embedding as required by [F3]. The sphere is compact and disjoint from all centers, so both forms are smooth on a neighborhood of its image and their pullbacks are admissible for [F3]. Pulling back to the outward-oriented Euclidean sphere gives ∫Sis,S∗(⋆gFσ)=−σ∫S∂νH dSδ, because ∂νH=nkHk and the induced oriented area form has components ϵijknkdSδ. The pullback of Fσ to each spatial sphere is zero because every term in [F1] contains dx0, which vanishes on its tangent vectors; hence qm(S)=0. All pulled-back coefficients are independent of s, so both fluxes are independent of the chosen time slice.

1.3givenalgebra

Let Sr(a) be a Euclidean sphere with center a and radius r, and let m/∣x−b∣ be one term in H, where d:=∣b−a∣≠r. At x=a+rn with n∈S2, its outward normal derivative is −m(r−n⋅(b−a))/∣rn−(b−a)∣3. The sphere area element is r2dΩ, where dΩ=sin⁡θ dθ dϕ and ∫S2dΩ=2π∫0πsin⁡θ dθ=4π. If d=0, direct integration gives flux −4πm. If d>0, choose the polar axis along b−a; this orthogonal change preserves the induced sphere area. With u=cos⁡θ and n⋅(b−a)=du, the flux is −2πmr2J, where J:=∫−11r−du(r2+d2−2rdu)3/2 du. Set w=r2+d2−2rdu. Then du=−dw/(2rd), the endpoint square roots for w are r+d and ∣r−d∣, and r−du=(r2−d2+w)/(2r). Therefore J=14r2d((r2−d2)∫(r−d)2(r+d)2w−3/2 dw+∫(r−d)2(r+d)2w−1/2 dw). Using antiderivatives −2w−1/2 and 2w1/2 gives J=(r2−d2)(∣r−d∣−1−(r+d)−1)+(r+d−∣r−d∣)2r2d. If d<r, the numerator is 4d, so J=2/r2; if d>r, the numerator is 0, so J=0. Thus a Coulomb term contributes −4πm to the outward flux exactly when its center lies inside the sphere, and zero when its center lies outside.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1

The conditions in [F1] now hold, so the defined data exist on the entire punctured domain. Applying [F2] proves the source-free field equations there; no equation is asserted at a removed center.

2.2givenA1F3step 1.2step 1.3algebra

For an isolated sphere SA(r), its own center has d=0, while each other center has distance dAB>r by [A1]. Applying step 1.3 term by term gives ∫SA(r)∂νH dSδ=−4πmA. Step 1.2 yields qe(SA(r))=σmA, and that step also gives qm(SA(r))=0.

3.1givenA1F3step 1.2step 1.3algebra∎

On an outer sphere that strictly encloses every center, each term has d=∣aA∣<R. Step 1.3 gives ∫SR∂νH dSδ=−4π∑AmA. Step 1.2 therefore yields qe(SR)=σ∑AmA and qm(SR)=0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources