How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Entropy jump residual
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ().
Let and be open, let be open and convex, and let , . Let have , let , and set . Suppose is piecewise across , satisfies classically on each open side, and the state, flux, and entropy compositions are locally integrable. Let be convex and let satisfy for every . With , the distributional entropy residual is Here uses the plane measure defined in the vector jump-residual theorem: integrate in and in with , where is a linear isometry onto , using Lebesgue measure and singleton mass one when . The entropy inequality holds near the interface if and only if at every interface point. Entropy admissibility is an additional condition; the conservation jump equality alone does not imply it.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the state field, entropy pair, and planar interface in the Statement.
Distributional systems and entropy flux pairs defines a convex entropy pair by and fixes the entropy inequality sign by requiring the nonnegative-test integral to be nonnegative.
Planar shocks and piecewise smooth traces fixes the one-sided traces and jump orientation .
Vector Rankine–Hugoniot condition proves the interface distribution calculation from the distributional derivative definition and one-dimensional integration by parts in a normal coordinate.
The chain rule for total derivatives: states when and are totally differentiable.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is the hypothesis required by the Rankine–Hugoniot supplier in [F3].
On each open side, satisfies the conservation system classically and has the piecewise extensions from [F2].
Proof
On either open side, [F4] and entropy compatibility give .
The fields and have extensions to each side of . Apply the normal-coordinate distribution calculation from [F3] under the stated Countable Choice assumption [F5] to this scalar density and its scalar fluxes; the bulk residuals vanish by step 1.1, leaving the interface coefficient . The interface measure is the time integral of the isometric pushforward of Lebesgue measure specified in [F3].
If this coefficient is nonpositive everywhere, pairing the residual with any nonnegative test gives a nonpositive value, which is the distributional inequality. If the coefficient is positive at a point, continuity makes it positive on a smaller interface patch; a nonnegative test supported there has positive pairing, contradicting the inequality. Thus the distributional inequality holds exactly under the stated pointwise condition.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Constantine M. Dafermos, Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, 2nd ed., Chapter III §3.2 and Chapter IV §4.5
- Lawrence C. Evans, Entropy and Partial Differential Equations, Chapter V §§2–3
- Piotr Gwiazda, Martin Michálek, and Agnieszka Świerczewska-Gwiazda, A Note on Weak Solutions of Conservation Laws and Energy/Entropy Conservation, §1