Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Entropy inequality under an assumed viscous limit

Statement

Let T>0, let Ω⊆Rd be open, let F∈C2(R;Rd), and let η∈C2(R) be convex. Let q∈C1(R;Rd) satisfy qj′(z)=η′(z)Fj′(z) for every z∈R and 1≤j≤d. For each ϵ>0, let uϵ:[0,T]×Ω→R, with initial trace u0ϵ:=uϵ(0,⋅), and let u:(0,T)×Ω→R and u0:Ω→R. Suppose uϵ, ∂tuϵ, all first spatial derivatives, and all second spatial derivatives are continuous on [0,T]×K for every compact K⊆Ω. Suppose uϵ solves ∂tuϵ+∑j=1d∂xjFj(uϵ)=ϵΔuϵon (0,T)×Ω, Suppose ∣uϵ∣,∣u∣≤M almost everywhere for one finite M, uϵ→u as ϵ↓0 strongly in Lloc1((0,T)×Ω), and u0ϵ→u0 as ϵ↓0 strongly in Lloc1(Ω). Here fϵ→f strongly in Lloc1(X) means ∫K∣fϵ−f∣ dλ→0 for every compact K⊆X, with Lebesgue measure λ on X. Then, for every nonnegative real test ψ∈Cc∞([0,T)×Ω), ∫0T ⁣ ⁣∫Ω(η(u)∂tψ+∑j=1dqj(u)∂xjψ) dx dt+∫Ωη(u0(x))ψ(0,x) dx≥0. This is a conditional passage for any family satisfying the stated smoothness, bound, and convergence assumptions; it asserts neither existence nor compactness of such a family.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the flux, entropy pair, smooth approximate solutions, uniform bound, strong local convergence, and compatible initial traces in the Statement.

[F1]

Distributional systems and entropy flux pairs defines qj′=η′Fj′ and the initial entropy inequality by its nonnegative-test integral, including the initial trace term.

[F2]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a) gives the classical chain rule for compositions of differentiable Euclidean maps.

[F3]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a) gives ∫cdG′=G(d)−G(c) when G is differentiable on a closed interval and its derivative is integrable.

[F4]

Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product permits iterated integration of the compactly supported integrands over time and spatial coordinates.

[A1]

Each uϵ is a classical solution on (0,T)×Ω, with the stated continuous initial trace.

[A2]

The uniform range bound and both stated strong Lloc1 convergences hold.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2A1algebra

By [F2], the chain rule and compatibility give, pointwise for each ϵ>0, ∂tη(uϵ)+∑j∂xjqj(uϵ)=ϵη′(uϵ)Δuϵ. Applying the chain rule twice in each spatial coordinate and the product rule yields η′(uϵ)Δuϵ=Δη(uϵ)−η′′(uϵ)∣∇uϵ∣2. Since η′′≥0, the entropy residual is at most ϵΔη(uϵ).

2.1givenF3F4A1step 1.1

Multiply by ψ≥0 and integrate. By [F4], the integrals can be taken iteratively in time and each spatial coordinate. Applying [F3] to the smooth compactly supported products gives integration by parts twice in each spatial coordinate and once in time, with ψ vanishing near T, and yields ∫0T ⁣ ⁣∫Ω(η(uϵ)ψt+∑jqj(uϵ)ψxj) dx dt+∫Ωη(u0ϵ)ψ(0,x) dx≥−ϵ∫0T ⁣ ⁣∫Ωη(uϵ)Δψ dx dt. These integrations by parts are the one-dimensional FTC applied to the smooth compactly supported products in each coordinate and in time; no spatial boundary term remains.

3.1givenF1A2step 2.1algebra∎

Continuity of uϵ up to t=0 and its almost-everywhere bound on (0,T)×Ω imply ∣u0ϵ∣≤M on Ω: a value larger than M at any x0∈Ω would, by continuity, give a relative open neighborhood in (0,T)×Ω of positive measure where ∣uϵ∣>M. For every compact K⊆Ω, this bound and the strong initial convergence give 0≤∫K(∣u0∣−M)+ dx≤∫K∣u0−u0ϵ∣ dx→0, so (∣u0∣−M)+=0 almost everywhere on each such K. The countable compact exhaustion KN={x∈Ω:∣x∣≤N, dist⁡(x,Rd∖Ω)≥1/N} (taking the distance to the empty set to be +∞) covers Ω, hence ∣u0∣≤M almost everywhere on Ω. The functions η and qj are Lipschitz and bounded on [−M,M]. Thus [A2] implies local L1 convergence of η(uϵ) and qj(uϵ) to η(u) and qj(u), and of η(u0ϵ) to η(u0). For a given test, choose 0<τ<T and compact K⊆Ω with its support in [0,τ]×K. The same bounded ranges imply absolute integrability of η(u) and all qj(u) on this slab, as required by [F1]. For 0<δ<τ, the spacetime terms converge on [δ,τ]×K by the interior L1 convergence and these Lipschitz bounds. On (0,δ)×K, their difference is bounded in absolute integral by 2δλd(K)(sup⁡[−M,M]∣η∣ ∥ψt∥∞+∑j=1dsup⁡[−M,M]∣qj∣ ∥ψxj∥∞), uniformly in ϵ. Letting ϵ↓0 first and then δ↓0 proves convergence for the complete initial-boundary test. Moreover, the absolute value of the right-hand side in step 2.1 is at most ϵsup⁡[−M,M]∣η∣∫∣Δψ∣, which tends to zero. Passing to the limit yields the stated entropy inequality.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources