How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Entropy inequality under an assumed viscous limit
Statement
Let , let be open, let , and let be convex. Let satisfy for every and . For each , let , with initial trace , and let and . Suppose , , all first spatial derivatives, and all second spatial derivatives are continuous on for every compact . Suppose solves Suppose almost everywhere for one finite , as strongly in , and as strongly in . Here strongly in means for every compact , with Lebesgue measure on . Then, for every nonnegative real test , This is a conditional passage for any family satisfying the stated smoothness, bound, and convergence assumptions; it asserts neither existence nor compactness of such a family.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the flux, entropy pair, smooth approximate solutions, uniform bound, strong local convergence, and compatible initial traces in the Statement.
Distributional systems and entropy flux pairs defines and the initial entropy inequality by its nonnegative-test integral, including the initial trace term.
The chain rule for total derivatives: gives the classical chain rule for compositions of differentiable Euclidean maps.
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then gives when is differentiable on a closed interval and its derivative is integrable.
Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product permits iterated integration of the compactly supported integrands over time and spatial coordinates.
Each is a classical solution on , with the stated continuous initial trace.
The uniform range bound and both stated strong convergences hold.
Proof
By [F2], the chain rule and compatibility give, pointwise for each , Applying the chain rule twice in each spatial coordinate and the product rule yields . Since , the entropy residual is at most .
Multiply by and integrate. By [F4], the integrals can be taken iteratively in time and each spatial coordinate. Applying [F3] to the smooth compactly supported products gives integration by parts twice in each spatial coordinate and once in time, with vanishing near , and yields These integrations by parts are the one-dimensional FTC applied to the smooth compactly supported products in each coordinate and in time; no spatial boundary term remains.
Continuity of up to and its almost-everywhere bound on imply on : a value larger than at any would, by continuity, give a relative open neighborhood in of positive measure where . For every compact , this bound and the strong initial convergence give , so almost everywhere on each such . The countable compact exhaustion (taking the distance to the empty set to be ) covers , hence almost everywhere on . The functions and are Lipschitz and bounded on . Thus [A2] implies local convergence of and to and , and of to . For a given test, choose and compact with its support in . The same bounded ranges imply absolute integrability of and all on this slab, as required by [F1]. For , the spacetime terms converge on by the interior convergence and these Lipschitz bounds. On , their difference is bounded in absolute integral by uniformly in . Letting first and then proves convergence for the complete initial-boundary test. Moreover, the absolute value of the right-hand side in step 2.1 is at most , which tends to zero. Passing to the limit yields the stated entropy inequality.