Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux

Statement

Let L have a chosen first-variation decomposition with Euler functional Eϕ. Take a smooth two-parameter field family and its commuting coordinate variations δ1,δ2. If Eϕ=0 and each variation satisfies the linearized equation, meaning (δiEϕ)[η]=0 for every smooth test variation η with the input held fixed as in the definition, then dMω=0. For a finite oriented smooth singular four-chain C with ∂C=Σ2−Σ1+B, where the Σi are oriented three-chains and B is the remaining oriented boundary chain,

ΩΣ2−ΩΣ1=−∫Bω.

Thus on-shell closure alone gives independence between cuts only when the side flux vanishes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A chosen first-variation decomposition, a smooth two-parameter field family with commuting coordinate variations, a solution ϕ whose Euler functional vanishes, two variations satisfying the stated linearized equations, and a finite oriented smooth singular four-chain C whose boundary is Σ2−Σ1+B.

[A1]

Eϕ=0, and for each i∈{1,2}, (δiEϕ)[η]=0 for every smooth test variation η, with the input held fixed as specified in the chosen decomposition.

[F1]

For commuting variations, dMω=(δ1Eϕ)[δ2ϕ]−(δ2Eϕ)[δ1ϕ]. Variation identity for the presymplectic current

[F2]

For a finite smooth singular chain and a smooth form, ∫Cdω=∫∂Cω; chain integration is finite and linear. Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains

[F3]

ΩΣ=∫Σω for each finite oriented smooth singular three-chain Σ. Covariant presymplectic current

Proof

Given: As in [A1] and [F1]–[F3].

1.1A1F1

By [A1], (δ1Eϕ)[δ2ϕ]=(δ2Eϕ)[δ1ϕ]=0. Substitution in [F1] gives dMω=0 throughout the region.

2.1A1F2F3step 1.1

Apply [F2] to C: 0=∫CdMω=∫∂Cω=ΩΣ2−ΩΣ1+∫Bω. The last equality uses the oriented boundary decomposition in the Given line and the linearity in [F2]–[F3].

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

Rearranging step 2.1 gives ΩΣ2−ΩΣ1=−∫Bω. If ∫Bω=0, the two cut forms agree; without that condition the identity permits a nonzero difference.

Remarks

The chain is finite and compact in the sense of being a finite sum of compact simplex domains. No limit at spatial infinity, falloff assumption, or convergence of an exhaustion is included.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources