How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
On-shell closure and finite-region symplectic flux
Statement
Let have a chosen first-variation decomposition with Euler functional . Take a smooth two-parameter field family and its commuting coordinate variations . If and each variation satisfies the linearized equation, meaning for every smooth test variation with the input held fixed as in the definition, then . For a finite oriented smooth singular four-chain with , where the are oriented three-chains and is the remaining oriented boundary chain,
Thus on-shell closure alone gives independence between cuts only when the side flux vanishes.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A chosen first-variation decomposition, a smooth two-parameter field family with commuting coordinate variations, a solution whose Euler functional vanishes, two variations satisfying the stated linearized equations, and a finite oriented smooth singular four-chain whose boundary is .
, and for each , for every smooth test variation , with the input held fixed as specified in the chosen decomposition.
For commuting variations, . Variation identity for the presymplectic current
For a finite smooth singular chain and a smooth form, ; chain integration is finite and linear. Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains
for each finite oriented smooth singular three-chain . Covariant presymplectic current
Proof
Given: As in [A1] and [F1]–[F3].
By [A1], . Substitution in [F1] gives throughout the region.
Apply [F2] to : . The last equality uses the oriented boundary decomposition in the Given line and the linearity in [F2]–[F3].
Rearranging step 2.1 gives . If , the two cut forms agree; without that condition the identity permits a nonzero difference.
Remarks
The chain is finite and compact in the sense of being a finite sum of compact simplex domains. No limit at spatial infinity, falloff assumption, or convergence of an exhaustion is included.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Vivek Iyer and Robert M. Wald, Some Properties of Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy, §3, equations (44)–(47)
- Geoffrey Compère and Adrien Fiorucci, Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, §1.3.1
- Daniel Harlow and Jie-qiang Wu, Covariant phase space with boundaries, §2.2, equation (2.25)