Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Helicity line bundles have nonzero Chern number

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let S2={n∈R3:∣n∣=1} with the subspace topology and six smooth graph charts: for j∈{1,2,3} and ε∈{+1,−1}, the chart on {εnj>0} uses the other coordinates in B12={x∈R2:∣x∣<1} and has inverse nj=ε1−∑i≠jni2. Orient it by the outward unit normal, so an ordered tangent basis (u,v) is positive exactly when u×v=λn for some real λ>0; in spherical coordinates away from the poles its area form is dΩ=sin⁡θ dθ∧dφ. In that chart let n=(sin⁡θcos⁡φ,sin⁡θsin⁡φ,cos⁡θ), eθ=(cos⁡θcos⁡φ,cos⁡θsin⁡φ,−sin⁡θ), and eφ=(−sin⁡φ,cos⁡φ,0). For σ∈{+1,−1} set eσ=(eθ+iσeφ)/2, a local unit frame of Lσ,n=ran⁡Pσ(n). With Hermitian pairing u‾⋅v, define the skew-Hermitian connection form ωσ=eσ†deσ, its curvature Ωσ=dωσ, the real Berry connection Aσ=−ieσ†deσ, and Fσ=dAσ. Then Aσ=−σcos⁡θ dφ,Fσ=σsin⁡θ dθ∧dφ,12π∫S2Fσ=2σ. Use the Chern-Weil convention c1(Lσ)[S2]=i2π∫S2Ωσ for ∇=d+ωσ; then c1(Lσ)[S2]=−2σ. The north and south unit gauges eσN=eiσφeσ and eσS=e−iσφeσ have transition eσN=e2iσφeσS; the map eiφ↦e2iσφ has degree 2σ, since its argument changes by 4πσ as φ runs from 0 to 2π. Thus neither helicity line admits a global smooth unit section. This obstruction concerns each line separately and makes no nontriviality claim about the rank-two transverse complex bundle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the unit sphere with the graph charts and outward orientation in the Statement; the helicity line projections; and the stated Berry and Chern-Weil conventions.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice, ACω. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

For each n∈S2, Pσ(n) is a smooth rank-one orthogonal projection, and Lσ,n=ran⁡Pσ(n). Transverse one-photon space and helicity projectors

[F2]

The polar surface measure of S2 has total mass 4π. Zonal and quadratic sphere moments for the polar surface measure on S2

[F3]

Under ACω, if M is an oriented smooth n-manifold with boundary and η is a compactly supported smooth (n−1)-form, then ∫Mdη=∫∂Mj∗η with outward-normal-first boundary orientation. The general Stokes theorem

[F4]

The unit sphere is closed and bounded in R3, hence compact by Heine-Borel; the graph charts in the Statement make it a smooth 2-manifold without boundary. Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line

Proof

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F4], the local spherical frame and connection conventions in the Statement.

1.1F1givenalgebra

The vectors eθ,eφ are real unit vectors orthogonal to each other and to n, and n×eθ=eφ, n×eφ=−eθ. Hence eσ has unit norm and satisfies h(n)eσ=σeσ, so it is a local frame of Lσ,n. Direct differentiation gives eθ⋅deφ=−cos⁡θ dφ and eφ⋅deθ=cos⁡θ dφ; the diagonal terms vanish. Therefore eσ†deσ=iσ2(eθ⋅deφ−eφ⋅deθ)=−iσcos⁡θ dφ. Multiplying by −i gives Aσ=−σcos⁡θ dφ, and differentiating gives Fσ=σsin⁡θ dθ∧dφ.

1.2givenalgebra

In Cartesian coordinates, the north and south gauges for σ=+1 are e+N=12((1+n3)/2−(n1+in2)2/[2(1+n3)]i(1+n3)/2+i(n1+in2)2/[2(1+n3)]−(n1+in2)),e+S=12((n3−1)/2+(n1−in2)2/[2(1−n3)]i(1−n3)/2+i(n1−in2)2/[2(1−n3)]−(n1−in2)). Their denominators are nonzero on the north and south charts respectively, so they are smooth there. Since e−N=e+N‾ and e−S=e+S‾, the gauges for σ=−1 are smooth as well. Each has unit norm because it differs from eσ by a phase. On the overlap, eσN=e2iσφeσS, and the transition map eiφ↦e2iσφ has degree 2σ.

2.1F2givenstep 1.1algebra

Since Fσ=σdΩ, [F2] gives ∫S2Fσ=4πσ, hence the normalized Berry flux is 2σ. The skew-Hermitian curvature is Ωσ=dωσ=iFσ because ωσ=iAσ. Under the stated Chern-Weil convention, c1(Lσ)[S2]=i2π∫S2iFσ=−12π∫S2Fσ=−2σ.

3.1A1F3F4step 2.1step 1.2assume-contraalgebradischarge-contradiction∎

Suppose a global smooth unit section s of Lσ existed. Then As=−i s†ds would be a globally defined smooth real one-form with compact support because S2 is compact by [F4]. On each local unit frame, writing s=geσ with ∣g∣=1 gives As=Aσ−ig−1dg; the correction is closed because d(g−1dg)=−g−2dg∧dg=0, so dAs=Fσ. The sphere is oriented and boundaryless by the Statement and [F4], so [F3] yields ∫S2Fσ=∫S2dAs=∫∂S2As=0. This contradicts ∫S2Fσ=4πσ≠0 from step 2.1. Therefore no global smooth unit helicity eigenvector exists.

Remarks

The displayed real Berry-flux convention gives +2σ, while the explicitly defined standard Chern-Weil convention gives c1=−2σ. The sign difference follows from Ωσ=iFσ and is a convention conversion; both numbers are nonzero and give the same obstruction. The proof concerns the helicity eigenline bundles only.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources