Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Forward positivity for a matched scalar EFT coefficient

Physical scope

Conditional sign constraint on the matched on-shell coefficient combination of one four-dimensional gapped identical-real-scalar channel satisfying the exact analyticity, crossing, high-energy, pole-subtraction, spectral, and matching inputs stated here. It establishes neither amplitude existence nor a universal sign for arbitrary off-shell Wilson coefficients.

Statement

Let m>0, Λ>2m, and 0<μ∗<Λ. Use natural units and the four-dimensional Minkowski metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1). Let ϕ be a real scalar of engineering dimension one with a stable one-particle pole of mass m, where stable means an isolated real mass pole with zero decay width. In the convention S=1+i(2π)4δ4(pout−pin)A+⋯, let A(s)=A(s,0,4m2−s) be the forward amplitude for identical on-shell external momenta pj2=−m2, p1+p2=p3+p4, with s=−(p1+p2)2, t=−(p1−p3)2, u=−(p1−p4)2, s+t+u=4m2, and crossing A(s)=A(4m2−s). For a finite crossing-paired sum containing every stable variable simple pole in the open subthreshold interval

P(s)=∑j(rjs−pj+rj4m2−pj−s),rj∈R,pj∈(0,4m2)∖{2m2},

Put ν0=2m2, v=s−2m2, and B(v)=A(2m2+v)−P(2m2+v). Require B(−v)=B(v), B(v‾)=B(v)‾, and holomorphy on C∖((−∞,−ν0]∪[ν0,∞)). Require finite upper and lower cut-boundary values except at ±ν0, and require B to extend continuously from each open half-plane onto every compact cut-bank segment avoiding ±ν0. This compact-bank continuity is an explicit admissibility input. Require B(w)=o(∣w∣2) uniformly as ∣w∣→∞ in the closed upper half-plane, including upper cut-bank limits. Let ρ(ν)=Im⁡B(ν+i0) for ν>ν0, extended by ρ(ν0)=0 without asserting a threshold boundary limit. Require ρ to be nonnegative and Riemann integrable on every compact subinterval of [ν0,∞), with finite ∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−3 dν. For every real ∣v∣<ν0, require the upper/lower boundary-bank integrals of [B(x)−B(0)]/[x2(x−v)] to exist as finite improper Riemann limits and the small threshold-arc integrals of this same integrand to vanish as their radii tend to zero. Assume no massless pole or cut reaches t=0. Define c1=B′′(0)/2!.

At the fixed matching scale μ∗, suppose the selected local representative contains the real dimension-eight interaction C8(μ∗)(∂μϕ ∂μϕ)2/Λ4, with C8(μ∗) dimensionless, and the exact matched coefficient identity is c1=4C8(μ∗)/Λ4+Δmatch, where Δmatch has mass dimension −4 and includes every other contribution to the exact v2 coefficient. Then

C8(μ∗)+Λ44Δmatch≥0.

If the exact retained-order matching condition additionally gives Δmatch=0, then C8(μ∗)≥0. The result is only a necessary bound on this specified matched channel combination; it asserts neither that a full amplitude exists for every coefficient passing the bound nor that every off-shell operator coefficient has a universal sign.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A gapped scalar forward-amplitude input with m>0, the stated crossing-even pole subtraction and analytic/spectral hypotheses, a fixed EFT representative and matching scale, and the exact coefficient identity c1=4C8(μ∗)/Λ4+Δmatch.

[A1]

Gapped scalar EFT forward channel and matched coefficient data: the supplied amplitude has the stated m>0 gap, forward crossing, complete specified pole subtraction, two-cut holomorphic domain, real analyticity, uniform o(∣v∣2) high-energy condition, nonnegative locally integrable ρ with finite ρ/ν3 moment, and boundary/endpoint integral conditions. The same definition fixes c1=B′′(0)/2! and the exact match c1=4C8(μ∗)/Λ4+Δmatch for the displayed dimension-eight local representative.

[A2]

Gapped scalar EFT forward channel and matched coefficient data: the fixed local representative contains O8=(∂μϕ ∂μϕ)2 with interaction density +C8(μ∗)O8/Λ4, using the stated mostly-plus metric, identical external scalar, and Mandelstam conventions.

[A3]

Gapped scalar EFT forward channel and matched coefficient data: B extends continuously from each open half-plane onto every compact segment of either real cut bank avoiding ±ν0; this is an explicit admissibility assumption on the supplied data.

[F1]

Forward positivity for a gapped identical scalar: for the specified gapped identical-scalar data, B(2n)(0)/(2n)!=(2/π)∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−(2n+1) dν≥0 for every integer n≥1. Only n=1 is used.

[F2]

Quartic scalar contact jets descend through verified operator relations: the explicit finite quartic polarization/Fourier map descends on the image of the metric-contracted quartic subspace in the existing quotient, provided every declared relation there has the stated polynomial/total-derivative/free-EOM certificate. It gives tO8(v)=8m4+4v2 and first normalized contact coordinate 4ν02C8/Λ4. This result concerns one contact insertion, not a full quantum matching theorem.

Proof

1.1givenA1A3F1

The channel assumptions in [A1] and [A3] give the exact hypotheses of [F1], including m>0, crossing evenness, complete subtraction of the specified variable poles, the two-cut analytic domain, the uniform high-energy bound, nonnegative ρ, compact cut-bank continuity, and the boundary and convergence conditions. Taking n=1 in [F1] and using c1=B′′(0)/2! yields c1≥0. This is a conditional deduction from the supplied amplitude data, not a construction of an amplitude.

1.2A1A2F2algebra

Use [F2] only for the finite-jet contact polynomial: for this calculation take the raw representative C8(μ∗)O8 and the zero relation space R8={0}, whose certificate is vacuous. Its stated polarization gives tC8O8(v)=C8(μ∗)(8m4+4v2), so the algebraic v2 coefficient after multiplication by Λ−4 is 4C8(μ∗)/Λ4. This calculation does not identify the contact polynomial with the exact amplitude. The exact identity c1=4C8(μ∗)/Λ4+Δmatch is the separate matching premise [A1], with Δmatch retaining every other contribution.

2.1A1step 1.1algebra

By the exact matching identity in [A1], the full coefficient is c1=4C8(μ∗)/Λ4+Δmatch. Combining this with step 1.1 gives 4C8(μ∗)/Λ4+Δmatch≥0. Multiplying by Λ4/4>0 proves the claimed matched-coefficient inequality.

3.1givenF1step 2.1algebra∎

If the additional matching condition is Δmatch=0, step 2.1 reduces to C8(μ∗)≥0. Equality is permitted because [F1] supplies a nonnegative, not strictly positive, moment.

Remarks

The positivity input concerns the exact pole-subtracted on-shell amplitude coefficient. The local contact vertex contributes 4C8/Λ4 in the stated convention, while other terms at the same v2 order remain in Δmatch. A finite-order EFT calculation sets that remainder to zero only if the exact matching data explicitly say so. Massless forward exchange, gravitational poles, non-polynomial high-energy growth, or an unproved matching identity fall outside this theorem's hypotheses.

The matching supplier also defines the full normalized contact-jet map on its verified-relation quotient image. For a supplied exact amplitude, the remaining Taylor coordinates belong to the remainder R(v)=B(v)−C8tO8(v)/Λ4; in particular [v2]R=Δmatch. No polynomial contact term is separately required to satisfy the exact amplitude's high-energy bound.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources