How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Forward positivity for a matched scalar EFT coefficient
Conditional sign constraint on the matched on-shell coefficient combination of one four-dimensional gapped identical-real-scalar channel satisfying the exact analyticity, crossing, high-energy, pole-subtraction, spectral, and matching inputs stated here. It establishes neither amplitude existence nor a universal sign for arbitrary off-shell Wilson coefficients.
Statement
Let , , and . Use natural units and the four-dimensional Minkowski metric . Let be a real scalar of engineering dimension one with a stable one-particle pole of mass , where stable means an isolated real mass pole with zero decay width. In the convention , let be the forward amplitude for identical on-shell external momenta , , with , , , , and crossing . For a finite crossing-paired sum containing every stable variable simple pole in the open subthreshold interval
Put , , and . Require , , and holomorphy on . Require finite upper and lower cut-boundary values except at , and require to extend continuously from each open half-plane onto every compact cut-bank segment avoiding . This compact-bank continuity is an explicit admissibility input. Require uniformly as in the closed upper half-plane, including upper cut-bank limits. Let for , extended by without asserting a threshold boundary limit. Require to be nonnegative and Riemann integrable on every compact subinterval of , with finite . For every real , require the upper/lower boundary-bank integrals of to exist as finite improper Riemann limits and the small threshold-arc integrals of this same integrand to vanish as their radii tend to zero. Assume no massless pole or cut reaches . Define .
At the fixed matching scale , suppose the selected local representative contains the real dimension-eight interaction , with dimensionless, and the exact matched coefficient identity is , where has mass dimension and includes every other contribution to the exact coefficient. Then
If the exact retained-order matching condition additionally gives , then . The result is only a necessary bound on this specified matched channel combination; it asserts neither that a full amplitude exists for every coefficient passing the bound nor that every off-shell operator coefficient has a universal sign.
Statement references
Gapped scalar EFT forward channel and matched coefficient data
Forward positivity for a gapped identical scalar
Quartic scalar contact jets descend through verified operator relations
Adams et al., Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion, § 4
de Rham et al., Positivity Bounds for Scalar Theories, §§ 2.1–2.2
Basile et al., Lectures in Quantum Gravity, §§ 3.2.1–3.3.1
Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, §§ 2.2.1, 2.2.3–2.2.4, and opening § 2.2.5
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A gapped scalar forward-amplitude input with , the stated crossing-even pole subtraction and analytic/spectral hypotheses, a fixed EFT representative and matching scale, and the exact coefficient identity .
Gapped scalar EFT forward channel and matched coefficient data: the supplied amplitude has the stated gap, forward crossing, complete specified pole subtraction, two-cut holomorphic domain, real analyticity, uniform high-energy condition, nonnegative locally integrable with finite moment, and boundary/endpoint integral conditions. The same definition fixes and the exact match for the displayed dimension-eight local representative.
Gapped scalar EFT forward channel and matched coefficient data: the fixed local representative contains with interaction density , using the stated mostly-plus metric, identical external scalar, and Mandelstam conventions.
Gapped scalar EFT forward channel and matched coefficient data: extends continuously from each open half-plane onto every compact segment of either real cut bank avoiding ; this is an explicit admissibility assumption on the supplied data.
Forward positivity for a gapped identical scalar: for the specified gapped identical-scalar data, for every integer . Only is used.
Quartic scalar contact jets descend through verified operator relations: the explicit finite quartic polarization/Fourier map descends on the image of the metric-contracted quartic subspace in the existing quotient, provided every declared relation there has the stated polynomial/total-derivative/free-EOM certificate. It gives and first normalized contact coordinate . This result concerns one contact insertion, not a full quantum matching theorem.
Proof
The channel assumptions in [A1] and [A3] give the exact hypotheses of [F1], including , crossing evenness, complete subtraction of the specified variable poles, the two-cut analytic domain, the uniform high-energy bound, nonnegative , compact cut-bank continuity, and the boundary and convergence conditions. Taking in [F1] and using yields . This is a conditional deduction from the supplied amplitude data, not a construction of an amplitude.
Use [F2] only for the finite-jet contact polynomial: for this calculation take the raw representative and the zero relation space , whose certificate is vacuous. Its stated polarization gives , so the algebraic coefficient after multiplication by is . This calculation does not identify the contact polynomial with the exact amplitude. The exact identity is the separate matching premise [A1], with retaining every other contribution.
By the exact matching identity in [A1], the full coefficient is . Combining this with step 1.1 gives . Multiplying by proves the claimed matched-coefficient inequality.
If the additional matching condition is , step 2.1 reduces to . Equality is permitted because [F1] supplies a nonnegative, not strictly positive, moment.
Remarks
The positivity input concerns the exact pole-subtracted on-shell amplitude coefficient. The local contact vertex contributes in the stated convention, while other terms at the same order remain in . A finite-order EFT calculation sets that remainder to zero only if the exact matching data explicitly say so. Massless forward exchange, gravitational poles, non-polynomial high-energy growth, or an unproved matching identity fall outside this theorem's hypotheses.
The matching supplier also defines the full normalized contact-jet map on its verified-relation quotient image. For a supplied exact amplitude, the remaining Taylor coordinates belong to the remainder ; in particular . No polynomial contact term is separately required to satisfy the exact amplitude's high-energy bound.