Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Forward positivity for a gapped identical scalar

Statement

Let m>0, ν0=2m2, and let A(s), its real crossing-symmetric subtraction P(s) of the specified isolated real subthreshold simple poles and their crossing partners, and B(v)=A(2m2+v)−P(2m2+v) satisfy the gapped identical-scalar amplitude conditions defined above. In particular, all such variable poles are removed; B is holomorphic on C∖((−∞,−ν0]∪[ν0,∞)), real analytic, and crossing even; B extends continuously from each half-plane onto every compact cut-bank segment away from the thresholds; B(v)=o(∣v∣2) uniformly on the closing arcs; and no massless pole or cut reaches t=0. Its forward absorptive density is ρ(ν)=Im⁡B(ν+i0) for ν>ν0, extended by the harmless convention ρ(ν0)=0 without asserting a threshold limit; it is nonnegative, locally Riemann integrable with the cut-boundary limits specified above, and has finite ∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−3 dν. Then for every integer n≥1,

B(2n)(0)(2n)!=2π∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν2n+1 dν≥0.

In particular, the first nonconstant even Taylor coefficient B′′(0)/2! is nonnegative. Equality is allowed; no strict bound or sign for an arbitrary off-shell operator coefficient is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The amplitude data with m>0, gap ν0=2m2, paired real subthreshold simple-pole subtraction, crossing, real analyticity, the exact o(∣v∣2) upper-half-plane condition, and the stated Riemann boundary and convergence hypotheses.

[F1]

Gapped identical-scalar forward-amplitude data: B is holomorphic on the two-cut domain, real analytic, and has ρ(ν)=Im⁡B(ν+i0)≥0, locally Riemann integrable on [ν0,∞), with ∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−3 dν<∞; all specified variable subthreshold poles are subtracted and the endpoint caps vanish. For each real ∣v∣<ν0, the two cut-bank integrals of [B(x)−B(0)]/[x2(x−v)] exist as finite improper Riemann limits. In addition, B has a continuous extension from each half-plane onto compact cut-bank segments away from the thresholds; this is an explicit extra admissibility premise.

[F2]

Crossing evenness at the scalar subtraction point: B(−v)=B(v) and B′(0)=0.

[F3]

Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy: if f is holomorphic on a disc and γ is a positively oriented compactly contained circle, then f(z)=(2πi)−1∫γf(ζ)/(ζ−z) dζ for interior z.

[F4]

The filled difference quotient is continuous at its exceptional point and holomorphic away from it: for holomorphic f near z0, the quotient (f(z)−f(z0))/(z−z0), filled by f′(z0), is continuous on the domain and holomorphic away from z0.

[F5]

A continuous function holomorphic away from one point on a star-shaped domain has a primitive and zero closed-contour integrals: a continuous function holomorphic away from one point in an open star-shaped domain has zero integral around every closed rectifiable contour in that domain.

[F6]

Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space: U is star-shaped with respect to a∈U when a+t(x−a)∈U for every x∈U and 0≤t≤1; an open half-plane has this property.

[F7]

Improper integrals over unbounded intervals: a right-unbounded Riemann integral is the finite limit of its truncation integrals.

[F8]

Linearity of convergent improper integrals: convergent improper Riemann integrals on the same one-ended interval are linear under finite real combinations.

[F10]

Comparison tests for improper integrals: if f and g are locally Riemann integrable, 0≤f≤g eventually toward an improper end, and the improper integral of g converges, then that of f converges.

Proof

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

Apply [F3] to B on any circle centered at 0 with radius r<ν0. Expanding (ζ−v)−1=∑j≥0vjζ−j−1 uniformly on that circle for ∣v∣<r gives the Taylor series of B near 0. By [F2], every odd coefficient vanishes. Hence H(v):=(B(v)−B(0))/v2 has a holomorphic extension through v=0 with H(0)=B′′(0)/2!, and H is real on the real gap.

1.2F4F5F6givenconstruct

Fix a real v∈(−ν0,ν0), R>ν0+∣v∣, 0<η<min⁡(1,(ν0−∣v∣)/3), and δ>0. Choose ϵ>0 so the closed radius-ϵ discs about ±ν0 are disjoint, avoid the radius-η disc about v, and lie strictly inside the radius-R circle about v. Let Uδ={z:Im⁡z>−δ/2}, which is star-shaped by [F6]. The contour ΓR,η,ϵ follows the real line left-to-right from v−R to v+R, replacing the intervals about v and ±ν0 by upper semicircles traversed left-to-right, and closes by the radius-R upper semicircle traversed right-to-left. The filled function Gδ(z)=(H(z+iδ)−H(v+iδ))/(z−v) is continuous on Uδ and holomorphic away from v by [F4].

2.1step 1.2F5algebra

Apply [F5] to Gδ on ΓR,η,ϵ. The integral of dz/(z−v) over the contour without threshold detours is zero: the real-segment logarithms cancel, and the small and large semicircles contribute −iπ and +iπ. Replacing a real interval about either threshold by its semicircle preserves that integral, because 1/(z−v) is holomorphic on a disc containing the interval and semicircle but not v; [F5] applied there gives equality of the two path integrals. Thus ∫ΓR,η,ϵdz/(z−v)=0, and the definition of Gδ yields ∫ΓR,η,ϵH(z+iδ)/(z−v) dz=0.

3.1step 2.1F1givenalgebra

First hold R,η,ϵ fixed and let δ↓0. The detoured contour avoids the threshold points and v. On each retained real cut segment K, the new continuous-bank hypothesis in [F1] gives uniform convergence of H(x+iδ) to H+(x). Explicitly, the integral error is at most ∣K∣sup⁡K∣H(x+iδ)−H+(x)∣/dist⁡(K,v), which tends to zero. Compact gap segments and semicircles have the same uniform convergence by holomorphy, with their length and minimum distance from v giving the analogous bound. Therefore the entire fixed contour integral converges to its boundary-contour value. Take imaginary parts at these fixed radii: every retained real-gap segment contributes zero because H is real there. Now let ϵ↓0: the threshold semicircle contributions vanish by exactly the endpoint-arc hypothesis in [F1], and the retained imaginary cut integrals converge by the specified improper-bank limits. This step does not require convergence of separate real-part integrals on the gap side of a threshold. Finally let R→∞ and η↓0. The outer integral has modulus at most πsup⁡∣z−v∣=R, Im⁡z≥0∣H(z)∣→0 by the uniform high-energy bound. On the small semicircle the difference from −iπH(v) is bounded by πsup⁡∣z−v∣=η∣H(z)−H(v)∣→0. Since H(v) is real, the resulting imaginary-part identity is H(v)=π−1∫RIm⁡H+(x)/(x−v) dx, with the integrand set to zero throughout the gap, including at x=v. Only the cut integrals remain; a full complex real-line principal value is not asserted. No dominated-convergence theorem or unasserted interchange of pointwise boundary limits is used.

4.1step 3.1F1F2F7F10algebra

On the gap, Im⁡H+(x)=0. For ν>ν0 on the right cut, Im⁡H+(ν)=ρ(ν)/ν2. On the left cut, evenness and real analyticity give Im⁡H+(−ν)=−ρ(ν)/ν2. Substituting these boundary values into step 3.1 and changing variables x=−ν on the left cut gives H(v)=π−1∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−2((ν−v)−1+(ν+v)−1) dν=(2/π)∫ν0∞ρ(ν)/[ν(ν2−v2)] dν. Both integrals converge: on each compact interval, ρ is Riemann integrable and each kernel is continuous, so their products are Riemann integrable. Explicitly, for bounded f and continuous g, osc⁡J(fg)≤∥g∥∞osc⁡Jf+∥f∥∞osc⁡Jg on every subinterval J, where osc⁡Jf:=sup⁡Jf−inf⁡Jf. A Darboux-good partition for f, refined to small mesh using uniform continuity of g, proves this product claim. The kernels are bounded near threshold and at infinity they are bounded by a constant times ν−3; [F7, F10] apply. This same compact-interval argument applies to every continuous kernel multiplying ρ below. This is the twice-subtracted forward dispersion relation, with subtraction constants B(0) and B′(0)=0 and with all specified subthreshold poles removed.

5.1step 1.1step 4.1F8F9F10algebra

Fix an integer N≥1. For real ∣v∣<ν0, expand 1/(1−v2/ν2) through order N; its remainder is bounded uniformly in ν≥ν0 by qN+1/(1−q), where q=v2/ν02<1. Using [F8] for the finite sum and [F9, F10] for the nonnegative remainder gives B(v)=B(0)+∑n=1N+1((2/π)∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−2n−1 dν)v2n+o(v2N+2) as v→0 through real values: the integrated remainder is bounded by (2/π)v2qN+1(1−q)−1∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−3 dν=O(v2N+4). The Taylor series of B from step 1.1 is unique: if a first coefficient differed, dividing the difference by its least differing power and taking v→0 would give a nonzero constant equal to 0. Since N is arbitrary, B(2n)(0)/(2n)!=(2/π)∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−2n−1 dν for every n≥1.

6.1F1F9F10step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

For each finite R>ν0, the integrand ρ(ν)/ν2n+1 is locally Riemann integrable by the compact-kernel argument in step 4.1 and is nonnegative, so [F9] gives ∫ν0Rρ(ν)ν−2n−1dν≥0. Its improper limit is finite by [F10], since 0≤ρ(ν)ν−2n−1≤ν0−2n+2ρ(ν)ν−3. Taking that limit and multiplying by 2/π>0 proves the asserted nonnegativity. If ρ vanishes, equality can occur; strict positivity is not concluded.

Remarks

The compact-bank continuity assumption is explicit additional data. Finite pointwise boundary values alone did not justify the former shifted-segment limit. The contour identity separates the two physical cuts only after the crossing-even pole subtraction and the explicit two-subtraction high-energy condition. A massless pole or cut at t=0, a nonvanishing outer contribution, or a nonpositive absorptive input invalidates this proof route. The result constrains forward on-shell amplitude combinations; it does not assign a universal sign to all Wilson coefficients.

The diagram is a schematic of the real z-plane contour ΓR,η,ϵ used in step 1.2, with R>∣v∣+ν0, 0<η<min⁡(1,(ν0−∣v∣)/3), and ϵ chosen as there. The drawing suppresses the fixed small upper detours about the two threshold points. These detours are essential to the compact boundary-limit argument; the integrand before δ↓0 is H(z+iδ). The small upper semicircle is traversed left-to-right and the large one right-to-left. The proof uses the stated contour integrals and orientations, not the drawing.

Rez¡º0º0v´R¡R;´;²

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources