Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dp Brane NS Two Form Gauge Invariance Of The Invariant Field

Physical scope

Local Abelian worldvolume NS two-form gauge shift on a smooth Dp probe; proves invariance of the DBI combination and the WZ exponential with RR potentials held fixed, not the full RR-potential gauge crosswalk.

Statement

Under the adopted shift δB2=dζ1, δA=ι∗ζ1/(2πα′) on a single Abelian Dp-brane, F=2πα′FA−ι∗B2 is invariant. Consequently the DBI determinant and the WZ exponential are unchanged when the RR potential polyform C is held fixed. This does not establish invariance under the simultaneous R4 RR-potential gauge transformations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth Abelian connection A, a smooth one-form gauge parameter ζ1 on the target, and the adopted NS shift on a fixed smooth embedding.

[F1]

Type II Dp Brane DBI WZ Action: F=2πα′FA−ι∗B2, FA=dA, δB2=dζ1, and δA=ι∗ζ1/(2πα′). This use is restricted to the explicit NS clause with the RR polyform held fixed; it does not use the separate RR gauge-transformation clause.

[F2]

Dp Brane Worldvolume Fields: for a single brane, A is an Abelian connection and its curvature is FA=dA.

[F3]

The exterior derivative commutes with pullback: for every smooth map ι and form ζ, d(ι∗ζ)=ι∗(dζ).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3

By [F1]–[F3], δFA=d(δA)=d(ι∗ζ1)/(2πα′)=ι∗(dζ1)/(2πα′).

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

Substituting step 1.1 and [F1] gives δF=2πα′ δFA−ι∗(δB2)=ι∗(dζ1)−ι∗(dζ1)=0. Thus both the determinant input and eF are unchanged; holding C fixed makes the displayed WZ integrand unchanged. The proof makes no claim about the separate RR transformation terms.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources