How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dp Brane NS Two Form Gauge Invariance Of The Invariant Field
Local Abelian worldvolume NS two-form gauge shift on a smooth Dp probe; proves invariance of the DBI combination and the WZ exponential with RR potentials held fixed, not the full RR-potential gauge crosswalk.
Statement
Under the adopted shift , on a single Abelian Dp-brane, is invariant. Consequently the DBI determinant and the WZ exponential are unchanged when the RR potential polyform is held fixed. This does not establish invariance under the simultaneous R4 RR-potential gauge transformations.
Statement References
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth Abelian connection , a smooth one-form gauge parameter on the target, and the adopted NS shift on a fixed smooth embedding.
Type II Dp Brane DBI WZ Action: , , , and . This use is restricted to the explicit NS clause with the RR polyform held fixed; it does not use the separate RR gauge-transformation clause.
Dp Brane Worldvolume Fields: for a single brane, is an Abelian connection and its curvature is .
The exterior derivative commutes with pullback: for every smooth map and form , .
Proof
By [F1]–[F3], .
Substituting step 1.1 and [F1] gives . Thus both the determinant input and are unchanged; holding fixed makes the displayed WZ integrand unchanged. The proof makes no claim about the separate RR transformation terms.