Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mechanical power balance under adopted wall laws

Physical scope

Smooth incompressible Newtonian solutions of constant positive density and viscosity on a fixed bounded C2 domain, or on the stated periodic channel with no-slip physical walls. The adopted stationary Navier friction law is used only on the bounded-domain branch. It gives conditional mechanical power identities and stationary bounded-domain smooth uniqueness only; no existence or universal wall-law applicability is asserted.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, meaning every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. Let T>0 seconds. The spatial domain is either (B) a bounded connected nonempty open Ω⊂R3 with C2 boundary, or (P) a periodic channel ΩLx,h,Lz:=(R/LxZ)×(0,h)×(R/LzZ) with Lx,Lz,h>0 metres. In (P), fields are periodic in the first and third coordinates on the Euclidean covering space, and the only physical wall boundary is Γ=(R/LxZ)×{0,h}×(R/LzZ); identified periodic faces are not walls. In (B), set Γ:=∂Ω. In either case let n be the outward unit normal on Γ, let dx be Euclidean volume measure (or its periodic-cell quotient measure), and let dS be the induced area measure on Γ. Let the constant mass density be ρ>0 kilograms per cubic metre, and let the coefficient μ of the adopted Newtonian closure be constant and denote its value by η>0 pascal-seconds; let the body-acceleration field be b∈C([0,T]×Ω‾;R3) in metres per second squared, the velocity be u∈C1([0,T];C2(Ω‾;R3)) in metres per second, and the pressure be p∈C([0,T];C1(Ω‾)) in pascals. Define D(u)ij:=(∂xjui+∂xiuj)/2, σ:=−pI+2ηD(u), and rowwise (div⁡σ)i:=∑j∂xjσij. For matrices A,B∈R3×3 define the Frobenius contraction A:B:=∑i,j=13AijBij and the squared norm ∣D(u)∣2:=D(u):D(u)=∑i,j=13D(u)ij2. In the proof, D abbreviates D(u). Put I=(0,T). In case (B), put B=Ω and assume χ∈C2(I×B;R3), with each χt:B→B an orientation-preserving C2 diffeomorphism, and u(t,χ(t,a))=∂tχ(t,a). In case (P), put Ω~=R×(0,h)×R and Λ={(mLx,0,nLz):m,n∈Z}; denote periodic lifts of u,b,σ by u~,b~,σ~. Assume χ~∈C2(I×Ω~;R3), with each χ~t:Ω~→Ω~ an orientation-preserving C2 diffeomorphism satisfying χ~(t,a+λ)=χ~(t,a)+λ for every λ∈Λ, and u~(t,χ~(t,a))=∂tχ~(t,a). For the material balance, write (B,χ,u♯,b♯,σ♯)=(Ω,χ,u,b,σ) in case (B), and (B,χ,u♯,b♯,σ♯)=(Ω~,χ~,u~,b~,σ~) in case (P). Here ν denotes the outward unit normal of χt(V); in case (P), the material-region integrals are on the Euclidean covering space. For every t∈I and every nonempty bounded open V⋐B with C1 boundary, assume the adopted material linear-momentum balance

ddt∫χt(V)ρu♯ dx=∫χt(V)ρb♯ dx+∫∂χt(V)σ♯ν dS,

Assume incompressibility as a model constraint, div⁡u=0 throughout the fluid domain (and div⁡u~=0 on its lift in case (P)). At every time impose one of the following wall laws: (N) no-slip, u=g on Γ for a prescribed tangential wall-velocity field g∈C1([0,T];C2(Γ;R3)) in metres per second with g⋅n=0; or (S) stationary Navier friction on branch (B) only, u⋅n=0 and (σn)τ=−βuτ on Γ, where aτ:=a−(a⋅n)n and β≥0 is the adopted constant wall coefficient in pascal-seconds per metre. Then the local momentum equation

ρ(∂tu+(u⋅∇)u)=div⁡σ+ρb

holds on the fluid domain by the local momentum result from the adopted material balance; incompressibility is the separate model constraint stated above, not a conclusion of that result. Let K(t):=∫Ωρ∣u(t,x)∣2/2 dx. Then for every t∈(0,T) in case (N),

dKdt=∫Ωρb⋅u dx−2η∫Ω∣D(u)∣2 dx+∫Γg⋅σn dS,

and for every t∈(0,T) in case (S),

dKdt=∫Ωρb⋅u dx−2η∫Ω∣D(u)∣2 dx−β∫Γ∣uτ∣2 dS.

Every term has units of watts. In branch (B) only, in either stationary homogeneous case, (N) with g=0 or (S) with a fixed β, there is at most one velocity field u in this smooth class for a given body force and initial velocity. No pressure uniqueness is asserted. These are deductions conditional on the stated model and wall assumptions; no solution-existence or empirical-applicability claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth fields, equations, units, boundary branch and Countable Choice assumption stated above.

[A1]

Single-component nonpolar continuum and material balances: the adopted material momentum balance uses body acceleration b, Cauchy stress σ, and traction σn; it asserts a model balance, not empirical universality. This current item is Step-1 ready.

[F1]

Constant-density incompressible Newtonian model: the current definition specifies constant positive density, div⁡u=0, pressure-multiplier stress σ=−pI3+2μD, and the rowwise stress divergence. Its displayed momentum equation is unforced and is not used here; [F7] derives the forced equation from [A1] and [F2]. The current Step-1 readiness record is ready.

[F2]

Newtonian stress and Fourier conductive closure: the current adopted closure is τ=2μD0+ζθI3 and σ=−pI3+τ. In the selected constant-viscosity incompressible branch, θ=0 and D0=D, so this gives the stress in the Statement; the current Step-1 readiness record is ready.

[F3]

Specified wall, thermal, periodic and initial data: no-slip is the separately selected equality of fluid and wall velocities, and impermeability equates their normal components. Here the fixed wall has tangential velocity g, so the selected no-slip branch has u=g and u⋅n=0; its current Step-1 readiness record is ready.

[F4]

Adopted Navier friction law for a stationary wall: at a stationary impermeable wall the adopted tangential traction is (σn)τ=−βuτ with β≥0 in Pa·s/m.

[F5]

Smooth bounded-wall and exterior solution domains: a bounded wall domain is bounded, connected and C2; its bounded-domain smooth velocity class is Ct1Cx2 and pressure has one continuous spatial derivative.

[F6]

Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain: for bounded C1 Ω and F∈C1(Ω‾;R3), the volume divergence integral equals the outward boundary flux. Its Statement assumes Countable Choice.

[A2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function; this is the exact choice strength used by [F6].

[L1]

Conditional wall energy and smooth uniqueness: the current theorem states the fixed bounded-domain smooth forced equations and uniqueness for two solutions with the same force, initial velocity, density, viscosity and selected homogeneous wall law. Its full current proof includes the integrating-factor Gronwall step, and its current Step-1 readiness record is ready. The statement and proof interface match this bounded-domain uniqueness use.

[F7]

Local momentum equation from the adopted continuum balance: under the adopted material balance, smooth material motion, constant density, incompressibility and selected Newtonian closure, the forced local momentum equation in the Statement follows pointwise. Its full local transport and continuity-localization proof is on this A page.

Proof

Given: The assumptions in the Statement, including the adopted material balance, the incompressible Newtonian branch, either boundary law, and Countable Choice.

1.1givenA1F1F2F7

The material-motion hypotheses in the Statement give an orientation-preserving C2 diffeomorphism of the bounded domain or of the periodic covering region, and the periodic lift is translation-equivariant; the displayed integral balance is exactly the adopted material balance [A1]. The regularity, constant positive density and viscosity, incompressibility constraint [F1], and stress closure [F2] satisfy the corresponding hypotheses of [F7]. Thus its forced pointwise momentum equation holds in the fluid domain. The local-momentum result does not derive incompressibility; that condition is imposed separately in the Statement.

2.1givenF1F3F4F6A2step 1.1algebra

Put k=ρ∣u∣2/2. Since ρ is constant and div⁡u=0, the product rule gives ∂tk+div⁡(ku)=ρu⋅(∂tu+(u⋅∇)u). In branch (B), the divergence theorem applied to ku gives boundary flux k(u⋅n)=0; in branch (P), periodic-coordinate endpoint values cancel and the two wall fluxes vanish because u⋅n=0. Substituting the local equation from step 1.1 therefore yields K′=∫Ωu⋅div⁡σ dx+∫Ωρb⋅u dx.

3.1givenF1F2step 2.1algebra

Using the Frobenius contraction and ∣D∣2=D:D defined in the Statement and the rowwise divergence convention, the product rule gives u⋅div⁡σ=div⁡(σTu)−σ:∇u. Write ∇u=D+W with W=(∇u−∇uT)/2; symmetry of D and skew-symmetry of W imply D:W=0, while div⁡u=tr⁡D=0. Consequently σ:∇u=(−pI+2ηD):(D+W)=2η∣D∣2.

4.1givenF5F6A2step 2.1step 3.1

In branch (B), apply [F6] to the C1 vector field σTu. In branch (P), integrate its coordinate divergence over a fundamental cell; the periodic side fluxes cancel and the two remaining wall fluxes equal ∫Γu⋅σn dS. In both cases the kinetic boundary flux is zero, so step 2.1 becomes K′=∫Ωρb⋅u dx−2η∫Ω∣D∣2 dx+∫Γu⋅σn dS. The domain regularity, field regularity and Countable Choice hypotheses of [F6] hold on branch (B) by the Statement and [A2].

5.1givenF3F4step 4.1algebra

In branch (N), u=g on the physical wall, so the last integral in step 4.1 is ∫Γg⋅σn dS. In branch (S), u=uτ and (σn)τ=−βuτ, so u⋅σn=uτ⋅(σn)τ=−β∣uτ∣2. These substitutions give the two asserted power identities.

6.1givenL1∎

For the stationary homogeneous branches, the same body force, boundary law, density, viscosity and initial velocity satisfy the exact current uniqueness interface recorded in [L1]. Its inspected integrating-factor argument gives at most one velocity in this smooth class; this does not assert existence.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources