Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Composition of two spin labels: total spin operators, the Clebsch-Gordan block decomposition and the spin-half singlet

Physical scope

The internal-factor reading of the composition of two declared spin labels s and t under the composition postulate P1, the spin assignment P6 and the locally adopted diagonal two-factor rotation action: the total spin operators on the tensor product of the two internal factors, their commutation relations and Casimir, the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition into total-spin blocks with multiplicities, and the explicit spin-half singlet. The item concerns the internal factors only; the full two-particle spatial model, statistics, interactions and any measured correlation belong to the composites pages and are not asserted here.

Statement

Adopt the composition postulate P1 and the internal-factor assignment of the spin postulate P6 in the readings of State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems and Identical-particle and spin assignments P6: permutation sectors and finite-spin representations (The state space of the framework: preparations, pure rays and density operators, Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases), and assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Fix two declared spin labels s,t∈{0,12,1,32,… } with internal factors Vs=C2s+1, Vt=C2t+1 and spin matrices Ji(s), Ji(t) of Finite spin matrices, and consider the composite internal factor Vs⊗Vt. On this composite, explicitly adopt the diagonal internal rotation assignment Ds,t(W):=Ds(W)⊗Dt(W) for W∈SU(2), where each Ds,Dt is the representation assigned by P6 clause (ii). This two-factor action is a local composite model assignment, not an additional conclusion of P6. Put Sitot:=ℏ(Ji(s)⊗IVt+IVs⊗Ji(t)),Stot 2:=∑i=13(Sitot)2,Sztot:=S3tot. Write Si(s):=ℏJi(s) and S(s)2:=∑i(Si(s))2, and similarly for t; define S±tot:=S1tot±iS2tot. Then:

(a) each Sitot is a self-adjoint endomorphism of Vs⊗Vt satisfying [Sitot,Sjtot]=iℏ∑kεijkSktot, Stot 2 is self-adjoint and commutes with every Sitot, and Stot 2=S(s)2⊗IVt+IVs⊗S(t)2+2∑i=13Si(s)⊗Si(t);

(b) there is an orthogonal decomposition Vs⊗Vt=⨁j=∣s−t∣s+tWj into Stot-invariant subspaces with dim⁡Wj=2j+1, on each of which the triple (S1tot,S2tot,S3tot) is unitarily equivalent to the spin-j matrices of Finite spin matrices scaled by ℏ; in particular Stot 2=ℏ2j(j+1)I on Wj, each j occurs exactly once, and there is an orthonormal basis (vj,k), 0≤k≤2j, of Wj with Sztotvj,k=ℏ(j−k)vj,k,S+totvj,k=ℏk(2j−k+1) vj,k−1,S−totvj,k=ℏ(k+1)(2j−k) vj,k+1; the coefficients of the vj,k in the product basis (em(s)⊗en(t)) are the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and are determined by the phase of the top vector uj (a unit vector of Sztot-weight ℏj orthogonal to all Wj′ with j′>j), with us+t=es(s)⊗et(t) admissible;

(c) for every M the Sztot-eigenspace with weight ℏM has dimension N(M)=#{m∈{−s,…,s}:M−m∈{−t,…,t}}, and the identity (em(s)⊗en(t))m,n is an orthonormal basis of Vs⊗Vt of Sztot-eigenvectors with weights ℏ(m+n);

(d) for s=t=12 one has V1/2⊗V1/2=W0⊕W1 with dim⁡W0=1 and dim⁡W1=3; the vector Ψ:=12(e1/2(1/2)⊗e−1/2(1/2)−e−1/2(1/2)⊗e1/2(1/2)) is a unit vector with SitotΨ=0 for every i, and it is the unique unit vector in the kernel of Stot 2 up to a phase;

(e) Scope. The statement concerns the internal factors of a declared composite, the assignments of P1 and P6 and the declared diagonal two-factor action. It asserts no spatial two-particle model, no statistics or permutation symmetry, no interaction, no dynamics, no measurement and no empirical correlation; in particular it does not by itself imply the singlet correlations of a separated pair, which belong to the composites page.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The postulates P1 and P6 in the stated readings; the Axiom of Countable Choice; the local diagonal rotation assignment Ds,t; the spin labels s,t; the internal factors with their bases (em(s)), (en(t)); the total spin operators; a real number M.

[F1]

Finite spin matrices. On Vs the matrices Ji(s) are self-adjoint with [Ji(s),Jj(s)]=i∑kεijkJk(s), J(s)2=s(s+1)I, J+(s)em(s)=(s−m)(s+m+1)em+1(s) and Jz(s)em(s)=mem(s) (and analogously for t) (Finite spin matrices clauses (a),(b),(c),(d)).

[F2]

Tensor spin composition. On Vs⊗Vt the operators Jitot:=Ji(s)⊗I+I⊗Ji(t) are self-adjoint with the angular momentum commutators, Jtot2=J(s)2⊗I+I⊗J(t)2+2∑iJi(s)⊗Ji(t), there is an orthogonal decomposition Vs⊗Vt=⨁j=∣s−t∣s+tWj with dim⁡Wj=2j+1, each j occurring once, on each block the triple is unitarily equivalent to the spin-j matrices, the weight multiplicity is N(M)=#{m∈Ls:M−m∈Lt} with the identity basis (em(s)⊗en(t)), and the block bases vj,k=(k!(2j)⋯(2j−k+1))−1/2(J−tot)kuj satisfy the displayed ladder actions, with the phase of uj fixing the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and us+t=es(s)⊗et(t) admissible (Tensor spin composition clauses (a),(b),(c),(d),(e), Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases).

[F3]

Internal-factor reading. P1 supplies the composite internal factor Vs⊗Vt, and P6 clause (ii) assigns Ds,Dt separately. The diagonal composite action Ds,t(W)=Ds(W)⊗Dt(W) is adopted in the Statement. Its representation law and unitarity follow from tensor composition and adjoints, and its continuity from the finite-dimensional continuity of each factor. Along Ai(u) its derivative at zero is −i(Ji(s)⊗I+I⊗Ji(t)) by the product rule and the P6 coordinate generators. Thus Sitot are the scaled generators of this assigned action. The model's spin observables are S=ℏJ on each factor (Identical-particle and spin assignments P6: permutation sectors and finite-spin representations clause (ii), State and composition postulate P1: Hilbert spaces, preparations and composite systems, The massive spin-s particle model of the framework: state space, operators, units and frame readings, Orbital, spin and total angular momentum of the massive spin-s model: assigned sharp observables, units and readings).

Proof

Proof technique: direct; rescale the matrix composition theorem by ℏ, transfer its decomposition and ladder statements to the total spin operators, and evaluate the spin-half singlet explicitly.

Given: The data of the statement and [F1]-[F3].

1.1F2algebra

[Operators and algebra] By [F2] the operators Jitot are self-adjoint with the angular momentum commutators and the displayed Casimir identity; multiplying by ℏ and using Sitot=ℏJitot, Si(s)=ℏJi(s), Si(t)=ℏJi(t) and S(s)2=ℏ2J(s)2 gives [Sitot,Sjtot]=iℏ∑kεijkSktot and the identity of (a). Each Sitot is self-adjoint, so its square is self-adjoint; because the space is finite-dimensional, their sum Stot 2 is self-adjoint. Its commutation with every Sitot follows from the Casimir commutation in [F2], which completes (a).

1.2F1F2algebra

[Singlet computation] Let s=t=12 and Ψ=12(e1/2(s)⊗e−1/2(t)−e−1/2(s)⊗e1/2(t)); by [F1] J+(s)e1/2(s)=0, J+(s)e−1/2(s)=e1/2(s) and J−(s)e1/2(s)=e−1/2(s), J−(s)e−1/2(s)=0, and analogously for t; hence J+tot(e1/2(s)⊗e−1/2(t))=e1/2(s)⊗e1/2(t)=J+tot(e−1/2(s)⊗e1/2(t)) and J−tot(e1/2(s)⊗e−1/2(t))=e−1/2(s)⊗e−1/2(t)=J−tot(e−1/2(s)⊗e1/2(t)), so J±totΨ=0, giving J1totΨ=J2totΨ=0 by J±tot=J1tot±iJ2tot. Separately, [F1] gives J3tot(e1/2(s)⊗e−1/2(t))=(12−12)e1/2(s)⊗e−1/2(t)=0 and J3tot(e−1/2(s)⊗e1/2(t))=(−12+12)e−1/2(s)⊗e1/2(t)=0, hence J3totΨ=0 as well; Ψ is unit because the product basis is orthonormal.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra

[Decomposition and Clebsch-Gordan data] Transferring [F2] to the total spin operators by the rescaling of step 1.1 gives the orthogonal decomposition Vs⊗Vt=⨁j=∣s−t∣s+tWj with dim⁡Wj=2j+1, the unitary equivalence with the spin-j matrices on each block and hence Stot 2=ℏ2j(j+1)I on Wj, the weight multiplicity of (c) and the identity basis; the block bases vj,k have the displayed ladder actions with the stated phase convention, which are (b) and (c).

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F2algebra

[Uniqueness of the singlet] For s=t=12 the decomposition of step 2.1 has the two blocks j=0 and j=1 with dimensions 1 and 3, and Stot 2=0 on the one-dimensional block W0 and Stot 2=ℏ2⋅2I on W1; hence ker⁡Stot 2=W0 is one-dimensional, and since Ψ≠0 satisfies Stot 2Ψ=0 by step 1.2, it spans W0: the kernel is the line CΨ. This is (d).

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F3∎

[Assembly and scope] Step 1.1 proves (a), step 2.1 proves (b),(c), and step 3.1 proves (d); only the internal factors, the assignments of [F3] and the finite matrix composition theorem were used, no spatial two-particle factor, statistics, dynamics, measurement or empirical input entered, which is the scope statement (e).

Remarks

  • Role of the page. This theorem is the internal-factor supplier for the composites page, where the two-particle spatial factors, the preparation and the correlation analysis are added; no measured correlation or Bell statement is made here.
  • Phases. The block vectors are determined by the phase of the top vector; different phases multiply all Clebsch-Gordan coefficients of a block by the same phase, so all outcome probabilities built from one block are unaffected.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources