How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ideal independent loss preserves normalized factorial correlation
A selected mode with a finite positive ideal mean is sent through an explicitly assumed independent, constant-efficiency counting channel with no background or dark counts. The theorem does not model detector dead time, mode dependence, correlated loss, or actual measured data.
Statement
Assume the ideal wavepacket-counting postulate for a selected mode with , and let be the incoming density operator on (a positive self-adjoint trace-class operator with trace one). By that postulate, are the mode-count projections and are the count probabilities, so and . Define the incoming mean and second factorial moment by and assume and . Define ; for this input state , the postulate denotes the same statistic by .
Let be a dimensionless fixed efficiency and assume no background or dark counts. To specify independent recording, put , , and This is countable under the explicit encoding . Give the space the point masses where the empty product for is . For each fixed , the product factors define the conditional product law on ; hence its coordinates are independent Bernoulli variables with success probability . Since , these point masses sum to one and define a probability measure on . Define and . For every nonnegative random variable on this space, use the expectation The marginal law of is , and the conditional count law of given is the binomial law induced by . If , define . Then Consequently the normalized zero-delay factorial correlation is unchanged: This is a model deduction conditional on independent constant-efficiency thinning; it is not a universal property of real detectors.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The count distribution of the ideal mode model, its finite moments and , a fixed efficiency , and conditionally independent Bernoulli recording of each incoming photon.
The conditional law on the th fiber of is , with and . For , the coordinate map is therefore Bernoulli with success probability , and the coordinate maps are mutually independent under . The joint mass is . This is the explicitly assumed thinning channel, not an empirical detector law.
For this incoming law, the ideal mode theorem uses the wavepacket postulate's input statistic when and . Thus the Statement's is exactly that postulate value for . Ideal one-mode intensity correlations separate model states
Nonnegative countable sums may be averaged and regrouped by Tonelli's theorem. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Proof
Fix and average on its finite fiber using . For each , factorization gives , and for distinct it gives . Since and for zero-one coordinates, it follows that and . For or the relevant sums are empty and the same formulas hold.
Using the Statement's encoding, identify with a subset of . For either or , extend by zero outside that subset. Counting measure on is sigma-finite, so [F2] applied to the product of the two counting-measure spaces permits the nonnegative sum to be regrouped over the finite fibers. Using step 1.1 gives and . Both are finite by hypothesis. Since , division gives by [F1].