Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-regulator Ward identity for the N=2∗ U(2) sphere model

Physical scope

Conditional finite-parameter Ward deduction for one supplied finite-dimensional regulator and fixed bundle sector of the adopted N=2* U(2) round-S4 model; no regulator construction, large-parameter saddle limit, noncompact pushforward, pole identification or continuum theorem.

Statement

Fix one bundle sector of the adopted N=2∗ U(2) model on round Sr4, with r>0, real Euclidean adjoint-hypermultiplet mass mE, and the source's gauge-fixed odd transformation including its mass-dependent flavor action. Use c=ℏ=1. Suppose a regulator realization of THIS model is supplied as an oriented finite-dimensional smooth manifold Mρ of dimension n, positive volume form μρ, graded algebra Ω∙(Mρ;C), and top-degree integral Iρ(F)=∫MρF[n]. Its smooth odd derivation Qρ must realize the selected model transformation and the total square Q2=δgauge(a0)+ω on regulated fields and ghosts, with the source-ordered RABQ=2ϵΓ~ABϵ~, the lift/gauge decomposition, the induced seven-auxiliary action, and the sectorwise Q-completed gauge fixing stated for that model; no massless SU(2) regulator or regulator existence is inferred.

Let J⊂R be a nonempty open interval of dimensionless parameters, Sρ,Oρ smooth even forms and Vρ a smooth odd form, with dimensionless action Sρ+tQρVρ. Put Et=e−Sρ−tQρVρ. Require QρSρ=QρOρ=0, (Qρ2Vρ)Et=0, and the exact anomaly-free, measure/cycle/boundary identity Iρ(Qρ(OρVρEt))=0 for all t∈J. For (OρEt)[n]=ftμρ, assume each ft is integrable and there is one measurable null set N⊂Mρ such that for every x∉N, the map t↦ft(x) is differentiable throughout J. For each t∈J, require the derivative x↦∂tft(x), set to zero on N, to be measurable. For every compact K⊂J, assume one gK∈L1(Mρ,μρ) and a measurable null set NK bound both ∣ft(x)∣ and ∣∂tft(x)∣ by gK(x) for every t∈K and every x∉NK. Then

Zρ(t)=Iρ(OρEt),Zρ′(t)=−Iρ(Oρ(QρVρ)Et)=−Iρ(Qρ(OρVρEt))=0,

and Zρ is constant on J. This is conditional on the stated finite regulator, at finite parameters and fixed sector. It proves no t→∞ saddle limit, noncompact ADHM pushforward, ADHM-to-Nekrasov pole equality, north/south regulator match, regulator removal or continuum functional measure. Those separate physical and analytic obligations remain necessary for a sphere partition-function formula.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The selected N=2∗ U(2) sphere model, one common null set for differentiability throughout the parameter interval, measurable zero-extended derivatives at each parameter, compact-parameter L1 majorants, and the other exact finite-regulator hypotheses in the Statement.

[A1]

Adopted N=2∗ U(2) Model on the Round Four-Sphere: the adopted model has global group U(2), one adjoint hypermultiplet of mass mE, and the specified curved background, contour, mass-dependent flavor transformation and formal regulator assumption; it constructs no measure.

[F1]

Finite-Dimensional Q-Exact Deformation Invariance: for differential-form integration on a finite-dimensional oriented manifold with the exact Q-closure, Q-squared, zero-boundary integral and compact-parameter L1-majorant hypotheses, the regulated integral has the derivative and constancy conclusion displayed above, at finite parameters only.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1

Assumption [A1] selects the physical theory and its mass-dependent transformation; the separately supplied regulator in the Statement must realize that transformation and its complete lifted/gauge/R/flavor square. The gauge-covariant source Lie derivative is decomposed in [A1] as the fixed geometric lift plus the gauge action of κv, and the cohomological parameter is ϕ=−κv; thus no gauge term is counted twice. Its RQ uses the source bilinear order and its auxiliary and ghost actions are those explicitly adopted in [A1]. This is not a substitution of the massless N=4 SU(2) model. Its graded form algebra, cycle and integral have exactly the mathematical type in [F1].

2.1givenF1step 1.1∎

Each remaining hypothesis of [F1] is explicitly assumed in the Statement: Q annihilates action and insertion, its square satisfies the stated deformation condition, the Q-exact integral vanishes without anomalous or boundary term, and the derivative and integrand have the compact-parameter integrable majorant. Apply [F1] to obtain the derivative formula and constancy on J. The theorem's finite-parameter limit is preserved; no missing saddle, pushforward, pole or continuum conclusion is deduced.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources