Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Interior exchange conditions from entropy maximization

Physical scope

Attained global equilibrium maxima for two independent separated systems in smooth single-phase positive-temperature charts, with only the specified energy, volume, and species exchanges permitted.

Statement

Consider two independent separated subsystems A,B of fixed material constitutions, with states in domains DcA,DcB as in Equilibrium state domains, and additive total energy, volume, and aligned mole amounts as in Additive separated systems and tagged bulk scaling using SI coordinates (SI quantities and unit conventions). Let Stot=SA+SB be their adopted total entropy, and let F be the exact feasible endpoint set fixed by the totals, retained partitions, and permitted exchanges in Isolated compound and feasible equilibrium set. Suppose x∗=(xA∗,xB∗)∈F is a stable equilibrium attaining the global entropy maximum adopted by Stable equilibrium requires an attained global entropy maximum. Assume both subsystems lie in open C2 single-phase charts with finite positive temperatures, and assume every exchange direction named below is locally feasible for both signs at x∗. Then:

  • If energy exchange is permitted, TA=TB.
  • If volume exchange is permitted, then pA/TA=pB/TB; if energy exchange is also permitted, this gives pA=pB.
  • If species j can be exchanged, then μA,j/TA=μB,j/TB; if energy exchange is also permitted, this gives μA,j=μB,j.

The pressure equality concerns the derivative-defined pressures of Entropic temperature, pressure, and molar chemical potentials. It is equality of mechanical piston pressures only when the coupling of Mechanical pressure-volume work coupling applies. A retained volume or species constraint supplies no corresponding equality.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two named subsystems in independent separated states, fixed total coordinates, an explicitly declared feasible set F, an attained global entropy-maximizing equilibrium point interior to every exchange direction used, C2 entropy on the local charts, SU>0, and SI coordinates. No empirical premise is used.

[A1]

Stable equilibrium requires an attained global entropy maximum: For a stable equilibrium of the declared isolated compound, the model adopts an attained global maximum of the summed entropy on the exact feasible endpoint set. It assumes attainment; it proves no dynamics or uniqueness.

[F1]

Isolated compound and feasible equilibrium set: F is the declared subset of the product of constituent state domains satisfying the specified totals and exactly the allowed exchanges; retained barriers fix the associated coordinates.

[F2]

Concave macroscopic fundamental entropy and Additive separated systems and tagged bulk scaling: On the selected smooth single-phase charts the entropy has finite C2 derivatives and SU>0, and independent separated constituents have additive entropy and the declared additive extensive coordinates.

[F3]

Thermal contact family and constraints: A diathermal contact permits thermal energy transfer between constituents while forbidding matter transfer and mechanical or composition work across that contact. Here it supports the energy-exchange variation only; [F1] and the stated bilateral-feasibility hypothesis govern the other named exchange channels.

[F4]

Entropic temperature, pressure, and molar chemical potentials: Each Dci uses dimensionless coordinates, and its physical chart is the image under Φci; the entropy on physical tuples is the composition with Φci−1. Write (Ui∗,Vi∗,ni∗)=Φci(xi∗) for the physical SI tuple of subsystem i. The derivative identities are Si,U=1/Ti, Si,V=pi/Ti, and Si,nj=−μi,j/Ti, with other physical coordinates fixed.

[F5]

SI quantities and unit conventions: The coordinates U,V,nj use joules, cubic metres, and moles; T is in kelvins, p in pascals, and μj in joules per mole.

[A2]

Mechanical pressure-volume work coupling: Along a C1 path of equilibrium states for the specified simple-compressible chart, a constant-area piston satisfies V=V∗+Aℓ with A>0. Such a path is quasistatic in the postulate's stated equilibrium-path sense, mechanically equilibrated when its net normal force vanishes, and frictionless when its tangential contact force vanishes. The postulate adopts pmech=pc and δWon=−pc dV on such a path; this is a physical assumption, not a mathematical consequence.

[L1]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): For differentiable maps between open Euclidean sets, the derivative of a composition is the composition of the derivatives. This is the mathematical chain rule used to differentiate entropy along each feasible one-parameter exchange.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3L1construct

For energy exchange choose an arbitrary sufficiently small nonzero h joules and the feasible physical-coordinate curves zA(t)=(UA∗+th,VA∗,nA∗), zB(t)=(UB∗−th,VB∗,nB∗) for t near 0. Their state-domain coordinates are ΦcA−1(zA(t)) and ΦcB−1(zB(t)); openness of the physical charts and the bilateral-feasibility hypothesis make both signs locally feasible. By [A1], g(t):=SA(zA(t))+SB(zB(t)) has a local maximum at 0; [F1] and [F3] specify that this thermal energy exchange is allowed. For t>0, (g(t)−g(0))/t≤0; for t<0, the same quotient is ≥0. Its derivative exists by [F2], so the two one-sided limits force g′(0)=0. The chain rule [L1] gives g′(0)=h(SA,U−SB,U). Since h≠0, SA,U=SB,U.

2.1givenF4step 1.1algebra

By [F4], Si,U=1/Ti for i=A,B. The temperatures are finite and positive, so equality of their reciprocals gives TA=TB.

3.1givenA1A2F1F2F4F5L1step 1.1step 2.1construct

If volume exchange is permitted, hold the energy and species partitions fixed and vary VA(t)=VA∗+tk, VB(t)=VB∗−tk for an arbitrary sufficiently small nonzero volume increment k. The same two-sided local-maximum argument in step 1.1 gives 0=k(SA,V−SB,V), hence SA,V=SB,V. By [F4], pA/TA=pB/TB. When energy exchange is also permitted, step 2.1 gives TA=TB>0, hence pA=pB. By [A2], this is equality of the two derivative pressures with their respective mechanical piston pressures whenever that coupling applies to each subsystem.

3.2givenA1F1F2F4F5L1step 1.1step 2.1construct

If species j is permitted to cross the partition, hold other coordinates fixed and vary nA,j(t)=nA,j∗+tq, nB,j(t)=nB,j∗−tq for a sufficiently small nonzero mole increment q. Both signs are feasible by hypothesis, so the same derivative argument as in step 1.1 gives SA,nj=SB,nj. By [F4], −μA,j/TA=−μB,j/TB; when energy exchange is also permitted, step 2.1 gives equal positive temperatures and hence μA,j=μB,j.

4.1givenF1step 3.1step 3.2∎

If a volume or species coordinate is retained by the definition of F, its corresponding two-sided feasible curve does not exist. The derivative argument above therefore yields no equality for that coordinate. Boundary points are also excluded by the stated local two-sided feasibility hypothesis.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources