Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Logarithmic BTT source route and local reconstruction

Statement

Felten–Petracci Theorem 1.1 reports the full logarithmic BTT interface: for any characteristic-zero field k, sharp toric monoid Q, and proper saturated log-smooth X0→Spec⁡(Q→k) with trivial relative log-canonical line, the full functor on Artk⟦Q⟧ is smooth. The source separates a Q=0 Thom–Whitney/Cartan-homotopy argument and a Q≠0 tower-lifting argument; its Theorem 3.7 defers the algebraization of the Chan–Leung–Ma method.

Under AC, the local reconstruction now supplies the missing arguments directly: Curved finite-cover calculus controlling all log-smooth deformations constructs the full curved geometric control, Proper log Hodge degeneration and pregluing total class lifting proves central E1 and all-Artin pregluing total-class lifting for proper central fibres, and All-class Artin lifting for a curved BV calculus proves lifting of every given classical class. The resulting theorem consumes this explicit chain rather than this source-report remark or a deferred source proof. This correction does not assert that a source citation alone proves its conclusion, nor change the SNC qualification KX(D)≅OX into KX≅OX.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources